mirror of
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git
synced 2025-12-06 01:49:46 +00:00
nfsd: decouple the xprtsec policy check from check_nfsd_access()
commite4f574ca9cupstream. A while back I had reported that an NFSv3 client could successfully mount using '-o xprtsec=none' an export that had been exported with 'xprtsec=tls:mtls'. By "successfully" I mean that the mount command would succeed and the mount would show up in /proc/mount. Attempting to do anything futher with the mount would be met with NFS3ERR_ACCES. This was fixed (albeit accidentally) by commitbb4f07f240("nfsd: Fix NFSD_MAY_BYPASS_GSS and NFSD_MAY_BYPASS_GSS_ON_ROOT") and was subsequently re-broken by commit0813c5f012("nfsd: fix access checking for NLM under XPRTSEC policies"). Transport Layer Security isn't an RPC security flavor or pseudo-flavor, so we shouldn't be conflating them when determining whether the access checks can be bypassed. Split check_nfsd_access() into two helpers, and have __fh_verify() call the helpers directly since __fh_verify() has logic that allows one or both of the checks to be skipped. All other sites will continue to call check_nfsd_access(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/ZjO3Qwf_G87yNXb2@aion/ Fixes:9280c57743("NFSD: Handle new xprtsec= export option") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
2d68f8a737
commit
779327c2be
@@ -1075,50 +1075,62 @@ static struct svc_export *exp_find(struct cache_detail *cd,
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
* check_nfsd_access - check if access to export is allowed.
|
* check_xprtsec_policy - check if access to export is allowed by the
|
||||||
|
* xprtsec policy
|
||||||
* @exp: svc_export that is being accessed.
|
* @exp: svc_export that is being accessed.
|
||||||
* @rqstp: svc_rqst attempting to access @exp (will be NULL for LOCALIO).
|
* @rqstp: svc_rqst attempting to access @exp.
|
||||||
* @may_bypass_gss: reduce strictness of authorization check
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Helper function for check_nfsd_access(). Note that callers should be
|
||||||
|
* using check_nfsd_access() instead of calling this function directly. The
|
||||||
|
* one exception is __fh_verify() since it has logic that may result in one
|
||||||
|
* or both of the helpers being skipped.
|
||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
* Return values:
|
* Return values:
|
||||||
* %nfs_ok if access is granted, or
|
* %nfs_ok if access is granted, or
|
||||||
* %nfserr_wrongsec if access is denied
|
* %nfserr_wrongsec if access is denied
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
__be32 check_nfsd_access(struct svc_export *exp, struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
|
__be32 check_xprtsec_policy(struct svc_export *exp, struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
|
||||||
bool may_bypass_gss)
|
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct exp_flavor_info *f, *end = exp->ex_flavors + exp->ex_nflavors;
|
struct svc_xprt *xprt = rqstp->rq_xprt;
|
||||||
struct svc_xprt *xprt;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
|
||||||
* If rqstp is NULL, this is a LOCALIO request which will only
|
|
||||||
* ever use a filehandle/credential pair for which access has
|
|
||||||
* been affirmed (by ACCESS or OPEN NFS requests) over the
|
|
||||||
* wire. So there is no need for further checks here.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
if (!rqstp)
|
|
||||||
return nfs_ok;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
xprt = rqstp->rq_xprt;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (exp->ex_xprtsec_modes & NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_NONE) {
|
if (exp->ex_xprtsec_modes & NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_NONE) {
|
||||||
if (!test_bit(XPT_TLS_SESSION, &xprt->xpt_flags))
|
if (!test_bit(XPT_TLS_SESSION, &xprt->xpt_flags))
|
||||||
goto ok;
|
return nfs_ok;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (exp->ex_xprtsec_modes & NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_TLS) {
|
if (exp->ex_xprtsec_modes & NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_TLS) {
|
||||||
if (test_bit(XPT_TLS_SESSION, &xprt->xpt_flags) &&
|
if (test_bit(XPT_TLS_SESSION, &xprt->xpt_flags) &&
|
||||||
!test_bit(XPT_PEER_AUTH, &xprt->xpt_flags))
|
!test_bit(XPT_PEER_AUTH, &xprt->xpt_flags))
|
||||||
goto ok;
|
return nfs_ok;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (exp->ex_xprtsec_modes & NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_MTLS) {
|
if (exp->ex_xprtsec_modes & NFSEXP_XPRTSEC_MTLS) {
|
||||||
if (test_bit(XPT_TLS_SESSION, &xprt->xpt_flags) &&
|
if (test_bit(XPT_TLS_SESSION, &xprt->xpt_flags) &&
|
||||||
test_bit(XPT_PEER_AUTH, &xprt->xpt_flags))
|
test_bit(XPT_PEER_AUTH, &xprt->xpt_flags))
|
||||||
goto ok;
|
return nfs_ok;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (!may_bypass_gss)
|
return nfserr_wrongsec;
|
||||||
goto denied;
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/**
|
||||||
|
* check_security_flavor - check if access to export is allowed by the
|
||||||
|
* security flavor
|
||||||
|
* @exp: svc_export that is being accessed.
|
||||||
|
* @rqstp: svc_rqst attempting to access @exp.
|
||||||
|
* @may_bypass_gss: reduce strictness of authorization check
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Helper function for check_nfsd_access(). Note that callers should be
|
||||||
|
* using check_nfsd_access() instead of calling this function directly. The
|
||||||
|
* one exception is __fh_verify() since it has logic that may result in one
|
||||||
|
* or both of the helpers being skipped.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Return values:
|
||||||
|
* %nfs_ok if access is granted, or
|
||||||
|
* %nfserr_wrongsec if access is denied
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
__be32 check_security_flavor(struct svc_export *exp, struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
|
||||||
|
bool may_bypass_gss)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
struct exp_flavor_info *f, *end = exp->ex_flavors + exp->ex_nflavors;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ok:
|
|
||||||
/* legacy gss-only clients are always OK: */
|
/* legacy gss-only clients are always OK: */
|
||||||
if (exp->ex_client == rqstp->rq_gssclient)
|
if (exp->ex_client == rqstp->rq_gssclient)
|
||||||
return nfs_ok;
|
return nfs_ok;
|
||||||
@@ -1160,10 +1172,30 @@ ok:
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
denied:
|
|
||||||
return nfserr_wrongsec;
|
return nfserr_wrongsec;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/**
|
||||||
|
* check_nfsd_access - check if access to export is allowed.
|
||||||
|
* @exp: svc_export that is being accessed.
|
||||||
|
* @rqstp: svc_rqst attempting to access @exp.
|
||||||
|
* @may_bypass_gss: reduce strictness of authorization check
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Return values:
|
||||||
|
* %nfs_ok if access is granted, or
|
||||||
|
* %nfserr_wrongsec if access is denied
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
__be32 check_nfsd_access(struct svc_export *exp, struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
|
||||||
|
bool may_bypass_gss)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
__be32 status;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
status = check_xprtsec_policy(exp, rqstp);
|
||||||
|
if (status != nfs_ok)
|
||||||
|
return status;
|
||||||
|
return check_security_flavor(exp, rqstp, may_bypass_gss);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Uses rq_client and rq_gssclient to find an export; uses rq_client (an
|
* Uses rq_client and rq_gssclient to find an export; uses rq_client (an
|
||||||
* auth_unix client) if it's available and has secinfo information;
|
* auth_unix client) if it's available and has secinfo information;
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ struct svc_expkey {
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
struct svc_cred;
|
struct svc_cred;
|
||||||
int nfsexp_flags(struct svc_cred *cred, struct svc_export *exp);
|
int nfsexp_flags(struct svc_cred *cred, struct svc_export *exp);
|
||||||
|
__be32 check_xprtsec_policy(struct svc_export *exp, struct svc_rqst *rqstp);
|
||||||
|
__be32 check_security_flavor(struct svc_export *exp, struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
|
||||||
|
bool may_bypass_gss);
|
||||||
__be32 check_nfsd_access(struct svc_export *exp, struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
|
__be32 check_nfsd_access(struct svc_export *exp, struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
|
||||||
bool may_bypass_gss);
|
bool may_bypass_gss);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -363,10 +363,30 @@ __fh_verify(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
|
|||||||
if (error)
|
if (error)
|
||||||
goto out;
|
goto out;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* If rqstp is NULL, this is a LOCALIO request which will only
|
||||||
|
* ever use a filehandle/credential pair for which access has
|
||||||
|
* been affirmed (by ACCESS or OPEN NFS requests) over the
|
||||||
|
* wire. Skip both the xprtsec policy and the security flavor
|
||||||
|
* checks.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
if (!rqstp)
|
||||||
|
goto check_permissions;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ((access & NFSD_MAY_NLM) && (exp->ex_flags & NFSEXP_NOAUTHNLM))
|
if ((access & NFSD_MAY_NLM) && (exp->ex_flags & NFSEXP_NOAUTHNLM))
|
||||||
/* NLM is allowed to fully bypass authentication */
|
/* NLM is allowed to fully bypass authentication */
|
||||||
goto out;
|
goto out;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* NLM is allowed to bypass the xprtsec policy check because lockd
|
||||||
|
* doesn't support xprtsec.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
if (!(access & NFSD_MAY_NLM)) {
|
||||||
|
error = check_xprtsec_policy(exp, rqstp);
|
||||||
|
if (error)
|
||||||
|
goto out;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (access & NFSD_MAY_BYPASS_GSS)
|
if (access & NFSD_MAY_BYPASS_GSS)
|
||||||
may_bypass_gss = true;
|
may_bypass_gss = true;
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
@@ -378,13 +398,15 @@ __fh_verify(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
|
|||||||
&& exp->ex_path.dentry == dentry)
|
&& exp->ex_path.dentry == dentry)
|
||||||
may_bypass_gss = true;
|
may_bypass_gss = true;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
error = check_nfsd_access(exp, rqstp, may_bypass_gss);
|
error = check_security_flavor(exp, rqstp, may_bypass_gss);
|
||||||
if (error)
|
if (error)
|
||||||
goto out;
|
goto out;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* During LOCALIO call to fh_verify will be called with a NULL rqstp */
|
/* During LOCALIO call to fh_verify will be called with a NULL rqstp */
|
||||||
if (rqstp)
|
if (rqstp)
|
||||||
svc_xprt_set_valid(rqstp->rq_xprt);
|
svc_xprt_set_valid(rqstp->rq_xprt);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
check_permissions:
|
||||||
/* Finally, check access permissions. */
|
/* Finally, check access permissions. */
|
||||||
error = nfsd_permission(cred, exp, dentry, access);
|
error = nfsd_permission(cred, exp, dentry, access);
|
||||||
out:
|
out:
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user