There is an interesting refcounting loop:
struct intel_memory_region has a struct ttm_resource_manager,
ttm_resource_manager->move may hold a reference to i915_request,
i915_request may hold a reference to intel_context,
intel_context may hold a reference to drm_i915_gem_object,
drm_i915_gem_object may hold a reference to intel_memory_region.
Break this loop by dropping region reference counting.
In addition, Have regions with a manager moving fence make sure
that all region objects are released before freeing the region.
v6:
- Fix a code comment.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211122214554.371864-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Xe_HP is more modular than its predecessors and as a consequence it has
more types of replicated registers. As with l3bank regions on previous
platforms, we may need to explicitly re-steer accesses to these new
types of ranges at runtime if we can't find a single default steering
value that satisfies the fusing of all types.
v2:
- Add a local 'i915' variable to reduce gt->i915 usage. (Caz)
- Drop unused 'intel_gt_read_register' prototype. (Caz)
v3:
- Drop unnecessary comment text. (Lucas)
- Drop unused register bit definition. (Lucas)
Bspec: 66534
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210729170008.2836648-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Workarounds are documented in the bspec with an exclusive upper bound
(i.e., a "fixed" stepping that no longer needs the workaround). This
makes our driver's use of an inclusive upper bound for stepping ranges
confusing; the differing notation between code and bspec makes it very
easy for mistakes to creep in.
Let's switch the upper bound of our IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP macros over to use
an exclusive upper bound like the bspec does. This also has the benefit
of helping make sure workarounds are properly handled for new minor
steppings that show up (e.g., an A1 between the A0 and B0 we already
knew about) --- if the new intermediate stepping pulls in hardware fixes
early, there will be an update to the workaround definition which lets
us know we need to change our code. If the new stepping does not pull a
hardware fix earlier, then the new stepping will already be captured
properly by the "[begin, fix)" range in the code.
We'll probably need to be extra vigilant in code review of new
workarounds for the near future to make sure developers notice the new
semantics of workaround bounds. But we just migrated a bunch of our
platforms from the IS_REVID bounds over to IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP, so people
are already adjusting to the new macros and now is a good time to make
this change too.
[mattrope: Split out GT changes to apply through gt-next tree]
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
The switch from old old IS_FOO_REVID() macros to the new table-based
IS_FOO_{GT,DISP}_STEP() macros is needed on both drm-intel-next (for
display-based DMC matching) and drm-intel-gt-next (for workaround
guards). To avoid conflicts, we'll apply the patches to a topic branch
and merge it to both intel branches to ensure the transition to the
new macros is clean.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation.
Initially we support only LMEM and SYSTEM memory, but SYSTEM
(which in this case means evicted LMEM objects) is not
visible to i915 GEM yet. The plan is to move the i915 gem system region
over to the TTM system memory type in upcoming patches.
We set up GPU bindings directly both from LMEM and from the system region,
as there is no need to use the legacy TTM_TT memory type. We reserve
that for future porting of GGTT bindings to TTM.
Remove the old lmem backend.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
In preparation for Xe HP multi-tile architecture with multiple memory
regions, we need to be able differentiate multiple instances of device
local-memory.
Note that the region name is just to give it a human friendly
identifier, instead of using class/instance which also uniquely
identifies the region. So far the region name is only for our own
internal debugging in the kernel(like in the selftests), or debugfs
which prints the list of regions, including the regions name.
v2: add commentary for our current region name use
Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210203171231.551338-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
