VFs do not perform HW fini/suspend in FLR, so the dpm_enabled
is incorrectly kept enabled. Add interface to disable it in
virt_pre_reset call.
v2: Made implementation generic for all asics
v3: Re-order conditionals so PP_MP1_STATE_FLR is only evaluated on VF
Signed-off-by: Victor Skvortsov <victor.skvortsov@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Add support to set/get information about different DPM policies. The
support is only available on SOCs which use swsmu architecture.
A DPM policy type may be defined with different levels. For example, a
policy may be defined to select Pstate preference and then later a
pstate preference may be chosen.
Signed-off-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Asad Kamal <asad.kamal@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The smu needs to get the rlc power down message to sync the rlc state
with smu, the rlc state updating message need to be sent at while smu
begin suspend sequence , otherwise SMU will crash while RLC state is not
notified by driver, and rlc state probally changed after that
notification, so it needs to notify rlc state to smu at the end of the
suspend sequence in amdgpu_device_suspend() that can make sure the rlc
state is correctly set to SMU.
[ 101.000590] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: SMU: I'm not done with your previous command: SMN_C2PMSG_66:0x0000001E SMN_C2PMSG_82:0x00000000
[ 101.000598] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: Failed to disable gfxoff!
[ 110.838026] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: SMU: I'm not done with your previous command: SMN_C2PMSG_66:0x0000001E SMN_C2PMSG_82:0x00000000
[ 110.838035] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: Failed to disable smu features.
[ 110.838039] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: amdgpu: Fail to disable dpm features!
[ 110.838040] [drm:amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase2 [amdgpu]] *ERROR* suspend of IP block <smu> failed -62
[ 110.884394] PM: suspend of devices aborted after 21213.620 msecs
[ 110.884402] PM: start suspend of devices aborted after 21213.882 msecs
[ 110.884405] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event detected
Reviewed-by: Yifan Zhang <yifan1.zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Prevent further dpm casting on legacy asics without od_enabled in
amdgpu_dpm_is_overdrive_supported. This can avoid UBSAN complain
in init sequence.
v2: add a macro to check legacy dpm instead of checking asic family/type
v3: refine macro name for naming consistency
Suggested-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
added a sysfs interface for thermal throttling, then userspace
can get/update thermal limit
Signed-off-by: Kun Liu <Kun.Liu2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Add debugfs interface to log GFXOFF statistics:
- Read amdgpu_gfxoff_count to get the total GFXOFF entry count at the
time of query since system power-up
- Write 1 to amdgpu_gfxoff_residency to start logging, and 0 to stop.
Read it to get average GFXOFF residency % multiplied by 100
during the last logging interval.
Both features are designed to be keep the values persistent between
suspends.
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Linux 5.18-rc5
There was a build fix for arm I wanted in drm-next, so backmerge rather then cherry-pick.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
The adev->pm.mutx is already held at the beginning of
amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks/amdgpu_dpm_enable_uvd/amdgpu_dpm_enable_vce.
But on their calling path, amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update will be
called and thus its sub functions amdgpu_dpm_get_sclk/mclk. They
will then try to acquire the same adev->pm.mutex and deadlock will
occur.
By placing amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update outside of adev->pm.mutex
protection(considering logically they do not need such protection) and
restructuring the call flow accordingly, we can eliminate the deadlock
issue. This comes with no real logics change.
Fixes: 3712e7a494 ("drm/amd/pm: unified lock protections in amdgpu_dpm.c")
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Reported-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9e689fea-6c69-f4b0-8dee-32c4cf7d8f9c@molgen.mpg.de/
BugLink: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1957
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
It must check asic whether support smu
before call smu powerplay function, otherwise
it may cause null point on no support smu asic.
Signed-off-by: Stanley.Yang <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
(v3)
Rewrote patchset to order patches as (API, hw impl, usecase)
- added API for new power management function emit_clk_levels
This function should duplicate the functionality of print_clk_levels,
but this solution passes the buffer base and write offset down the stack.
- new powerplay function emit_clock_levels, implemented by smu_emit_ppclk_levels()
This function parallels the implementation of smu_print_ppclk_levels and
calls emit_clk_levels, and allows the returns of errors
- new helper function smu_convert_to_smuclk called by smu_print_ppclk_levels and
smu_emit_ppclk_levels
Signed-off-by: Darren Powell <darren.powell@amd.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The sub-routine(amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl) tried to obtain the lock
adev->pm.mutex which was actually hold by amdgpu_dpm_force_performance_level.
A deadlock happened then.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
check null ptr first before access its element
v2: check adev->pm.dpm_enabled early in amdgpu_debugfs_pm_init()
Signed-off-by: Flora Cui <flora.cui@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
On functionality unsupported, -EOPNOTSUPP will be returned. And we rely
on that to determine the fan attributes support.
Fixes: 79c65f3fcb ("drm/amd/pm: do not expose power implementation details to amdgpu_pm.c")
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This is part of the forced performance level. Move it from
the sysfs handler into amdgpu_dpm_force_performance_level.
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
As the only entry point, it's now safe and reasonable to
enforce the lock protections in amdgpu_dpm.c. And with
this, we can drop other internal used power locks.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This can cover the power implementation details. And as what did for
powerplay framework, we hook the smu_context to adev->powerplay.pp_handle.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Drop cross callings and multi-function APIs. Also avoid exposing
internal implementations details.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Those APIs are used only by legacy ASICs(si/kv). They cannot be
shared by other ASICs. So, we create a new holder for them.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Display is another client of our power APIs. It's not proper to spike
into power implementation details there.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
amdgpu_pm.c holds all the user sysfs/hwmon interfaces. It's another
client of our power APIs. It's not proper to spike into power
implementation details there.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Those implementation details(whether swsmu supported, some ppt_funcs supported,
accessing internal statistics ...)should be kept internally. It's not a good
practice and even error prone to expose implementation details.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of blocking varied unsupported MP1 state in upper level,
defer and skip such MP1 state handling in specific ASIC.
Signed-off-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>