Currently, we may bump into pll mismatch errors during the
state verification stage. This happens when we try to use
fastset instead of full modeset. Hence, we would need to add
a check for pipe configuration to ensure that the sw and the
hw configuration will match. In case of hw and sw mismatch,
we would need to disable fastset and use full modeset instead.
v2: Fix C10 error on PLL comparison (BAT)
Use memcmp instead of fixed loops for pll config
comparison (Jani)
Clean up and use intel_cx0pll_dump_hw_state() to dump
pll information (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240523134649.31452-3-mika.kahola@intel.com
With HDMI monitors we bumped up a case where the crtc clock rate
caused a mismatch on state verification. This was due to
assumption that the SW clock rate from PLL structure would match
the calculated counterpart from HW. This is not necessarily always
the case and therefore we would actually need to recalculate the
clock rate from SW PLL parameters. Then these SW and HW crtc clock
rates can be compared with each other.
The patch recalculates the crtc clock rate for SW state based on
SW PLL parameters and compares the crtc clock rate calculated
from the parameters found from the HW.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240502131716.504616-1-mika.kahola@intel.com
Some registers for DDI A/B moved to PICA and now follow the same format
as the ones for the PORT_TC ports. The wrapper here deals with 2 issues:
- Share the implementation between xe2lpd and previous
platforms: there are minor layout changes, it's mostly the
register location that changed
- Handle offsets after TC ports
v2:
- Explain better the trick to use just the second range (Matt Roper)
- Add missing conversions after rebase (Matt Roper)
- Use macro instead of inline function, avoiding includes in the
header (Jani)
- Prefix old macros with underscore so they don't get used by mistake,
and name the new ones using the previous names
v3: Use the same logic for the recently-introduced XELPDP_PORT_MSGBUS_TIMER
(Gustavo)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240126224638.4132016-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Add pll selection check for C20 as well as
clock state verification0. We have been relying
on sw state to select A or B pll's. This is incorrect
as the hw might see this selection differently. This
patch fixes this shortcoming by reading pll selection
for both sw and hw states and compares if these two
selections match.
Fixes: 59be90248b ("drm/i915/mtl: C20 state verification")
v2: reword commit message and include fix to a
original commit (Imre)
Compare pll selection (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240102115741.118525-2-mika.kahola@intel.com
In C20 pll_state link_bit_rate and clock fields are bit redundant. Since
many of the helpers assume the clock values, which are different from
link_bit_rate for dp2.0, convert the helpers to use the numbers that
are compatible with link_bit_rate.
Currently link_bit_rate is compatible with crtc_state->port_clock. The
function intel_c20pll_calc_port_clock returns the number which is
compatible with crtc_state->port_clock. In order to avoid extra
conversions b/ween clock and link_bit_rate, remove "clock" field from the
C20 pll_state and then rename "link_bit_rate" as "clock".
While at it rely on crtc_state->port_clock during C20 Pll programming.
Cc: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231207221025.2032207-2-radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com
For Lunar Lake, DDI-A is connected to C10 PHY, while TC1-TC3 are connected
to C20 phy, like in Meteor Lake. Update the check in intel_is_c10phy()
accordingly.
This reverts the change in commit e388ae97e2 ("drm/i915/display:
Eliminate IS_METEORLAKE checks") that turned that into a display engine
version check. The phy <-> port connection is very SoC-specific and not
related to that version.
IS_LUNARLAKE() is defined to 0 in i915 as it's expected that the
(upcoming) xe driver is the one defining the platform, with i915 only
driving the display side.
Bspec: 70818
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231026184045.1015655-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Every know and then we receive the following error when running
for example IGT test kms_flip.
[drm] *ERROR* PHY G Read 0d80 failed after 3 retries.
[drm] *ERROR* PHY G Write 0d81 failed after 3 retries.
Since the error is sporadic in nature, the patch proposes
to reset the message bus after every successful or unsuccessful
read or write operation.
v2: Add FIXME's to indicate the experimental nature of
this workaround (Rodrigo)
v3: Dropping the additional delay as moving reset to *_read_once()
and *_write_once() functions seem unnecessary delay
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231016125544.719963-1-mika.kahola@intel.com
There was a recent update in the BSpec adding an extra step to the PLL
enable sequence, which is for programming the msgbus timer. Since we
also touch PHY registers during hw readout, let's do the programming
when starting a transaction rather than only when doing the PLL enable
sequence.
This might be the missing step that was causing the timeouts
that we have recently seen during C20 SRAM register programming
sequences. With this in place, we shouldn't need the logic to bump the
timer thresholds, since now we have a documented value that should be
set peform programming the registers. As such, let's also remove
intel_cx0_bus_check_and_bump_timer(), but keep the part that checks if
hardware really detected a timeout, which might be useful debugging
information.
v2:
- Use debug level instead of warning for the message notifying that
the hardware did not detect the timeout. (Mika)
- Got a new BSpec update clarifying that we need to program the msgbus
timer of both PHY lanes. Update the changes to reflect that.
(Gustavo)
BSpec: 64568
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230912155923.39494-1-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
We have experienced timeout issues when going through the sequence to
access C20 SRAM registers. Experimentation showed that bumping the
message bus timer threshold helped on getting display Type-C connection
on the C20 PHY to work.
While the timeout is still under investigation with the HW team, having
logic to allow forward progress (with the proper warnings) seems useful.
Thus, let's bump the threshold when a timeout is detected.
The bumped value of 0x200 pclk cycles was somewhat arbitrary - 2x the
default value. That value was successfully tested on real hardware that
was displaying timeouts otherwise.
v2:
- Reword commit message to indicate that access to C20 SRAM registers
is not direct. (Radhakrishna)
- Prefer not to use REG_FIELD_PREP() in intel_cx0_phy.c.
(Radhakrishna)
- Simplify intel_cx0_bus_check_and_bump_timer() to use a fixed bumped
value instead of progressively increasing the threshold. (Mika)
BSpec: 65156
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230830121524.15101-1-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
Most of the IS_METEORLAKE checks in the display code shouldn't actually
be tied to MTL as a platform, but rather to the Xe_LPD+ display IP
(which is used in MTL, but may show up again in future platforms). In
cases where we're trying to match that specific IP, use a version check
against IP_VER(14, 0). For cases where we're just handling new behavior
introduced by this IP (but which may also be inherited by future IP as
well), use a ver >= 14 check.
The one exception here is the stolen memory workaround Wa_13010847436
(which is mislabelled as "Wa_22018444074" in the code). That's truly a
MTL-specific issue rather than being tied to any of the IP blocks, so
leaving the condition as IS_METEORLAKE is correct there.
v2:
- cdclk check should be >=, not >. (Gustavo)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230821180619.650007-19-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
From PICA message bus we wait for acknowledgment from
read/write commands. In case of an error, we reset the
bus for the next command.
Current implementation ends up resetting message bus twice
in cases where error is not the timeout. Since, we only need
to reset message bus once, let's move reset to corresponding
timeout error and drop the excess reset function calls from
read/write functions.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230609122130.69794-1-mika.kahola@intel.com
