The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Paul Handrigan <Paul.Handrigan@cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
The board ID will be changed between revisions. So, it is better
to map it by project name.
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <bardliao@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Routes without a control must use NULL for the control name. The sn95031
driver uses "NULL" instead in a few places. Previous to commit 5fe5b767dc
("ASoC: dapm: Do not pretend to support controls for non mixer/mux widgets")
the DAPM core silently ignored non-NULL controls on non-mixer and non-mux
routes. But starting with that commit it will complain and not add the
route breaking the sn95031 driver in the process.
This patch replaces the incorrect "NULL" control name with NULL to fix the
issue.
Fixes: 5fe5b767dc ("ASoC: dapm: Do not pretend to support controls for non mixer/mux widgets")
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Routes without a control must use NULL for the control name. The da732x
driver uses "NULL" instead in a few places. Previous to commit 5fe5b767dc
("ASoC: dapm: Do not pretend to support controls for non mixer/mux widgets")
the DAPM core silently ignored non-NULL controls on non-mixer and non-mux
routes. But starting with that commit it will complain and not add the
route breaking the da732x driver in the process.
This patch replaces the incorrect "NULL" control name with NULL to fix the
issue.
Fixes: 5fe5b767dc ("ASoC: dapm: Do not pretend to support controls for non mixer/mux widgets")
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Acked-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Routes without a control must use NULL for the control name. The ak4671
driver uses "NULL" instead in a few places. Previous to commit 5fe5b767dc
("ASoC: dapm: Do not pretend to support controls for non mixer/mux widgets")
the DAPM core silently ignored non-NULL controls on non-mixer and non-mux
routes. But starting with that commit it will complain and not add the
route breaking the ak4671 driver in the process.
This patch replaces the incorrect "NULL" control name with NULL to fix the
issue.
Fixes: 5fe5b767dc ("ASoC: dapm: Do not pretend to support controls for non mixer/mux widgets")
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
The patch corrects the routing paths of that after IF1/2 DACx Mux
Signed-off-by: Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The STA32X_AUTO3 is a writable register that currently does not appear
in the regmap ranges(neither read nor write). By adding this register
to the register ranges there is no gap anymore and the existing
register ranges can be joined. This fixes a regression introduced in
commit a1be4cead9 where the driver was
moved to direct regmap usage and the STA32X_AUTO3 register was missed.
That made it impossible to choose the preset EQ mode set through the
STA32X_AUTO3 register.
Fixes: a1be4cead9 (ASoC: sta32x: Convert to direct regmap API usage)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Niederprüm <niederp@physik.uni-kl.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Add missing header files to avoid implicit
declarations and indirect inclusions.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Westfield <kwestfie@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We need to set left/right control for the speaker amp to get stereo
output on speaker.
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <bardliao@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This fixes the following compilation errors:
sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c: In function ‘max98357a_daiops_trigger’:
sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c:30:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gpiod_set_value’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c: In function ‘max98357a_codec_probe’:
sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c:55:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘devm_gpiod_get’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c:61:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gpiod_direction_output’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
Cc: Kenneth Westfield <kwestfie@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The max98357a driver depends on GPIOLIB. This may cause the following
build failure.
sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c: In function 'max98357a_daiops_trigger':
sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c:30:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpiod_set_value'
sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c: In function 'max98357a_codec_probe':
sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c:55:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'devm_gpiod_get'
sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c:61:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpiod_direction_output'
Seen with mips:allmodconfig as well as various randconfig builds.
Fixes: af5adf1293 ("ASoC: max98357a: Add MAX98357A codec driver")
Cc: Kenneth Westfield <kwestfie@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ASoC: Updates for v3.20
Nothing too exciting here yet, a small optimization for DAPM from
Lars-Peter and a few small bits and pieces for drivers but nothing
that really stands out.
# gpg: Signature made Tue 30 Dec 2014 00:15:48 HKT using RSA key ID 5D5487D0
# gpg: Oops: keyid_from_fingerprint: no pubkey
# gpg: key AF88CD16: no public key for trusted key - skipped
# gpg: key AF88CD16 marked as ultimately trusted
# gpg: key 5621E907: no public key for trusted key - skipped
# gpg: key 5621E907 marked as ultimately trusted
# gpg: Good signature from "Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>"
# gpg: aka "Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org>"
# gpg: aka "Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>"
# gpg: aka "Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk>"
# gpg: aka "Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>"
# gpg: aka "Mark Brown <Mark.Brown@linaro.org>"
ASoC: AC'97 fixes
These are rather too large for this late in the release cycle but
they're clear, well understood and have been tested to fix a regression
which was introduced for v3.19. The details are all in Lars' changelog
and they've been cooking in -next for a while, to a large extent out
of conservatism about the size.
