PSR WM optimization should be disabled based on any wm level being
disabled. Also same WA should be applied for ICL as well.
Bspec: 71580
v5:
- Set in pre plane hook and clear in post plane hook
v4:
- Handle mode change in psr enable/disable
- Handle wm_level_disable changes separately in pre plane hook
v3:
- Split patch
v2:
- set/clear chicken bit in post_plane_update
- apply for ICL as well
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230329150703.432072-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Wa_16013835468 is a separate from Wa_14015648006 and needs to be
applied for display version 12. Fix this by removing all the
references to Wa_14015648006 and apply Wa_16013835468 according to
Bspec.
Also move workaround into separate function as a preparation for
Wa_14015648006 implementation.
Bspec: 55378
v3:
- apply for display version 12 only
v2:
- keep applying the wa in intel_psr_enable_source
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230329150703.432072-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
There's only one reference to the struct intel_dmc members dc_state,
target_dc_state, and allowed_dc_mask within intel_dmc.c, begging the
question why they are under struct intel_dmc to begin with.
Moreover, the only references to i915->display.dmc outside of
intel_dmc.c are to these members.
They don't belong. Move them from struct intel_dmc to struct
i915_power_domains, which seems like a more suitable place.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230301122944.1298929-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Name the CPU transcoder timing registers TRANS_FOO rather than
just FOO. This is the modern name, after the pipe/transcoder split
happened. Makes it a bit more obvious whether you pass in a pipe or
a transcoder.
PIPESRC is a bit special as it's a pipe register, even though it
lives in the transcoder registers range (0x60000 instead of 0x70000).
And BCLRPAT I suppose is a transcoder register (since it has something
to do with the timing generator), but it doesn't even exist after gen4
so I left it to use the only name it ever had in bspec.
And while at it let's pass in the correct enum in few more
places why don't we. Although in all those places the distinction
doesn't matter.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230213225258.2127-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
SEL_FETCH_CTL registers are armed immediately when plane is disabled.
SEL_FETCH_* instances of plane configuration are used when doing
selective update and normal plane register instances for full updates.
Currently all SEL_FETCH_* registers are written as a part of noarm
plane configuration. If noarm and arm plane configuration are not
happening within same vblank we may end up having plane as a part of
selective update before it's PLANE_SURF register is written.
Fix this by splitting plane selective fetch configuration into arm and
noarm versions and call them accordingly. Write SEL_FETCH_CTL in arm
version.
v3:
- add arm suffix into intel_psr2_disable_plane_sel_fetch
v2:
- drop color_plane parameter from arm part
- dev_priv -> i915 in arm part
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230130080651.3796929-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently we are observing occasionally display flickering or complete
freeze. This is narrowed down to be caused by single full frame update
(SFF).
SFF bit after it's written gets cleared by HW in subsequent vblank
i.e. when the update is sent to the panel. SFF bit is required to be
written together with partial frame update (PFU) bit. After the SFF
bit gets cleared by the HW psr2 man trk ctl register still contains
PFU bit. If there is subsequent update for any reason we will end up
having selective update/fetch configuration where start line is 0 and
end line is 0. Also selective fetch configuration for the planes is
not properly performed. This seems to be causing problems with some
panels.
Using CFF without SFF doesn't work either because it may happen that
psr2 man track ctl register is overwritten by next update before
vblank triggers sending the update. This is causing problems to
psr_invalidate/flush. Using CFF and SFF together solves the problems
as SFF is cleared only by HW in subsequent vblank and the update gets
sent.
Fix the flickering/freeze issue by keeping CFF bit as set when PSR2 is
enabled unless there is a properly configured selective update via
atomic commit.
v2:
- Improve commit message and comments
- No functional changes
This is also workaround for HSD 14014971508
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reported-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Tested-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221201072308.1905679-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Turns out many of the files that need i915_reg.h get it implicitly via
{display/intel_de.h, gt/intel_context.h} -> i915_trace.h -> i915_irq.h
-> i915_reg.h. Since i915_trace.h doesn't actually need i915_irq.h,
makes sense to drop it, but that requires adding quite a few new
includes all over the place.
Prefer including i915_reg.h where needed instead of adding another
implicit include, because eventually we'll want to split up i915_reg.h
and only include the specific registers at each place.
Also some places actually needed i915_irq.h too.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e78a2e0ac1bffaf5af3b5ccc21dff05e6518cef.1668008071.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Currently we are observing mouse cursor stuttering when using
xrandr --scaling=1.2x1.2. X scaling/transformation seems to be
doing fronbuffer rendering. When moving mouse cursor X seems to
perform several invalidates and only one DirtyFB. I.e. it seems
to be assuming updates are sent to panel while drawing is done.
Earlier we were disabling PSR in frontbuffer invalidate call back
(when drawing in X started). PSR was re-enabled in frontbuffer
flush callback (dirtyfb ioctl). This was working fine with X
scaling/transformation. Now we are just enabling continuous full
frame (cff) in PSR invalidate callback. Enabling cff doesn't
trigger any updates. It just configures PSR to send full frame
when updates are sent. I.e. there are no updates on screen before
PSR flush callback is made. X seems to be doing several updates
in frontbuffer before doing dirtyfb ioctl.
Fix this by sending single update on every invalidate callback.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Fixes: 805f04d42a ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6679
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reported-by: Brian J. Tarricone <brian@tarricone.org>
Tested-by: Brian J. Tarricone <brian@tarricone.org>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221024054649.31299-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Current PSR code is supposed to use TRANSCODER_EDP to force 0 shift for
bits in PSR_IMR/IIR registers:
/*
* gen12+ has registers relative to transcoder and one per transcoder
* using the same bit definition: handle it as TRANSCODER_EDP to force
* 0 shift in bit definition
*/
At the time of writing the code assumption "TRANSCODER_EDP == 0" was made.
This is not the case and all fields in PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR are shifted
incorrectly if DISPLAY_VER >= 12.
Fix this by adding separate register field defines for >=12 and add bit
getter functions to keep code readability.
v4:
- Remove EDP from TGL definitions (José)
- Use REG_BIT and REG_GENMASK (José)
v3:
- Add separate register field defines (José)
- Add bit getter functions (José)
v2:
- Improve commit message (José)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Fixes: 8241cfbe67 ("drm/i915/tgl: Access the right register when handling PSR interruptions")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221003072011.72408-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
drm_plane_state->src is modified when offset is calculated:
before calculation:
src.x1 = 8192, src.y1 = 8192
after calculation (pitch = 65536, cpp = 4, alignment = 262144)
src.x1 = 8192, src.y1 = 0, offset = 0x20000000
Damage clips are relative to original coodrdinates provided by
user-space. To compare these against src coordinates we need to use
original coordinates as provided by user-space. These can be obtained
by using drm_plane_state_src.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220823112920.352563-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Move the panel specific VBT parsing to happen during the
output probing stage. Needs to be done because the VBT
parsing will need to look at the EDID to determine
the correct panel_type on some machines.
We split the parsed VBT data (i915->vbt) along the same
boundary. For the moment we just hoist all the panel
specific stuff into connector->panel.vbt since that seems
like the most convenient place for eg. the backlight code.
Note that we simply drop the drrs type check from
intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() since that operates on the whole
device rather than a specific connector/encoder. But the check
was just a micro optimization so removing it doesn't actually
mattter for correctness.
TODO: Lot's of cleanup to be done in the future. Eg. most of
the DSI stuff could probably be eliminated entirely and just
parsed on demand during DSI init.
v2: Note the intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() change
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Currently we have some corner cases where area calculation fails. For
these sel fetch area calculation ends up having update area as y1 = 0,
y2 = 4. Instead of these values safer option is full update.
One of such for example is big fb with offset. We don't have usable
offset in psr2_sel_fetch_update. Currently it's open what is the
proper way to fix this corner case. Use full update for now.
v2: Commit message modified
v3: Print out debug info once when area calculation fails
v4: Use drm_info_once
v5: pipeA -> "pipe %c", pipe_name(crtc-pipe)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220513142811.779331-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
After commit 805f04d42a ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full
frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations") was merged we started to
get some drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !(tmp & PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE))
in tests that are executed in pipe B.
This is probably due psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled being left set during
PSR disable in the pipe A, so the PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL write in
intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() is skipped in pipe B and then
we get the warning when actually enabling PSR after planes programing.
We don't get such warnings when running tests in pipe A because
PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL is only cleared when enabling PSR2 with hardware
tracking.
Was not able to reproduce this issue but cleaning the PSR state
disable will not harm anything at all.
Fixes: 805f04d42a ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5634
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220414151118.21980-2-jose.souza@intel.com
If any of the PSR2 checks after intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid()
fails, enable_psr2_sel_fetch will be kept enabled causing problems
in the functions that only checks for it and not for has_psr2.
So here moving the check that do not depend on enable_psr2_sel_fetch
and for the remaning ones jumping to a section that unset
enable_psr2_sel_fetch in case of failure to support PSR2.
Fixes: 6e43e276b8 ("drm/i915: Initial implementation of PSR2 selective fetch")
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220414151118.21980-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Instead of exit PSR when a frontbuffer invalidation happens, we can
enable the PSR2 selective fetch continuous full frame, that will keep
the panel updated like PSR was disabled but without keeping PSR active.
So as soon as the frontbuffer flush happens we can disable the
continuous full frame and start to do selective fetches much quicker
than the path that would enable PSR, that will wait a few frames
to actually activate PSR.
Also this approach has proven to fix some glitches found in Alderlake-P
when there are a lot of invalidations happening together with page
flips.
Some may ask why it is writing to CURSURFLIVE(), it is because
that is the way that hardware team provided us to poke display to
handle PSR updates, and it is being used since display 9.
v2:
- handling possible race conditions between frontbuffer rendering and
page flips
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Cc: Shawn C Lee <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Frontbuffer rendering and page flips can race with each other
and this can potentialy cause issues with PSR2 selective fetch.
And because pipe/crtc updates are time sentive we can't grab the
PSR lock after intel_pipe_update_start() and before
intel_pipe_update_end().
So here adding the lock and unlock functions and calls, the
proper PSR2 selective fetch handling will come in a separated patch.
v2:
- fixed new functions documentation
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Following up what was done in commit 804f468853 ("drm/i915/psr: Set
"SF Partial Frame Enable" also on full update") and also setting
partial frame enable when psr_force_hw_tracking_exit() is called.
Also as PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL is a double buffered registers do a RMW
is not a good idea so here also setting the man_trk_ctl_enable_bit()
that is required in TGL and only doing a register write.
v2:
- not doing a rmw
v3:
- removing the inline from functions that return PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL
bits
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-1-jose.souza@intel.com
