Mixing I915_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS and I915_ALLOC_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE fared
badly. The two directives conflict, with the contiguous request setting
the min_order to the full size of the object, and the max-segment-size
setting the max_order to the limit of the DMA mapper. This results in a
situation where max_order < min_order, causing our sanity checks to
fail.
Instead of limiting the buddy block size, in the previous patch we split
the oversized buddy into multiple scatterlist elements.
Fixes: d2cf0125d4 ("drm/i915/lmem: Limit block size to 4G")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201202173444.14903-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Block sizes are only limited by the largest power-of-two that will fit
in the region size, but to construct an object we also require feeding
it into an sg list, where the upper limit of the sg entry is at most
UINT_MAX. Therefore to prevent issues with allocating blocks that are
too large, add the flag I915_ALLOC_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE which should limit
block sizes to the i915_sg_segment_size().
v2: (matt)
- query the max segment.
- prefer flag to limit block size to 4G, since it's best not to assume
the user will feed the blocks into an sg list.
- simple selftest so we don't have to guess.
Cc: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201130134721.54457-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
