Rename intel_dp_sink_dpms() to intel_dp_set_power()
so one doesn't always have to convert from the DPMS
enum values to the actual DP D-states.
Also when dealing with a branch device this has nothing to
do with any sink, so the old name was nonsense anyway.
Also adjust the debug message accordingly, and pimp it
with the standard encoder id+name thing.
Trivial bits done with cocci:
@@
expression DP;
@@
(
- intel_dp_sink_dpms(DP, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF)
+ intel_dp_set_power(DP, DP_SET_POWER_D3)
|
- intel_dp_sink_dpms(DP, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON)
+ intel_dp_set_power(DP, DP_SET_POWER_D0)
)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201016194800.25581-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
intel_dp_ycbcr420_config() is rather pointless. Just inline it
directly into intel_dp_compute_config(). This gets rid of the
ugly double assignment of output_format.
Not really sure what the best policy would be when the user
supplies a mode classified by the display as "YCbCr 4:2:0
only", but we know that we can't do YCbCr 4:2:0 output. For
now keep the current behaviour of just silently upgrade
it to RGB 4:4:4.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200924184156.24491-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Remove the lspcon special case from intel_dp_compute_config() and
just treat it like any other DFP than can do 4:4:4->4:2:0 conversion.
The only difference between the two codepaths was that the lspcon
code tried to already halve port_clock. That was just total nonsense
as we hadn't even computed the base port_clock at that time.
All that stuff happens intel_dp_compute_link_config*() and it
already takes care of the 4:2:0 clock reduction.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200924184156.24491-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
The DP Standard's recommendation is to use the LTTPR non-transparent
mode link training if LTTPRs are detected, so let's do this.
Besides power-saving, the advantages of this are that the maximum number
of LTTPRs can only be used in non-transparent mode (the limit is 5-8 in
transparent mode), and it provides a way to narrow down the reason for a
link training failure to a given link segment. Non-transparent mode is
probably also the mode that was tested the most by the industry.
The changes in this patchset:
- Pass the DP PHY that is currently link trained to all LT helpers, so
that these can access the correct LTTPR/DPRX DPCD registers.
- During LT take into account the LTTPR common lane rate/count and the
per LTTPR-PHY vswing/pre-emph limits.
- Switch to LTTPR non-transparent LT mode and train each link segment
according to the sequence in DP Standard v2.0 (complete CR/EQ for
each segment before continuing with the next segment).
v2:
- Switch to non-transparent mode during connector detection, which is
required before reading the per-PHY LTTPR capabilities.
- Move the DP_PHY_LTTPR() macro to drm_dp_helper.h (Ville)
- Use the new drm_dp_dpcd_read_phy_link_status() instead of adding the
same logic to intel_dp_get_link_status(). (Ville)
- Make intel_dp_lttpr_phy_caps() return a pointer to the whole array
instead of a pointer to its first element. (Ville)
- Add the intel_dp_phy_is_downstream_of_source() helper. (Ville)
- Add a code comment about the disable->enable quirk of
non-transparent mode.
- Add the intel_dp_training_pattern_set_reg() helper.
- Fix checkpatch/sparse warns.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007170917.1764556-7-imre.deak@intel.com
By default LTTPRs should be in transparent link training mode,
nevertheless in this patch we switch to this default mode explicitly.
The DP Standard recommends this, supposedly because an LTTPR may be left
in the non-transparent mode (by BIOS, previous kernel, or after reset
due to a firmware bug). I haven't seen this happening, but let's follow
the DP Standard.
v2:
- Add a code comment about the explicit disabling of non-transparent
mode.
v3:
- Move check to prevent initing LTTPRs on eDP to init_dp_lttpr_init().
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007170917.1764556-6-imre.deak@intel.com
Split the prepare, link training, fallback-handling steps into their own
functions for clarity and as a preparation for the upcoming LTTPR
changes.
While at it also:
- Unexport and inline intel_dp_set_idle_link_train(), which is used at a
single place.
- Add some documentation to functions that are exported or that can use
a better description about which part of the LT sequence they
implement.
v2: (Ville)
- Unexport/inline intel_dp_set_idle_link_train()
- Make the documentation of
intel_dp_prepare_link_train()/intel_dp_stop_link_train() more accurate
wrt. HW specific details.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007170917.1764556-3-imre.deak@intel.com
An LTTPR can be trained with training pattern 4 even if the DPCD
revision is < 1.4, but drm_dp_training_pattern_mask() would change
pattern 4 to pattern 3 on those DPCD revisions.
Since intel_dp_training_pattern() makes already sure that the proper
training pattern is used, all that needs to be masked out is the
scrambling disable flag, which is or'd to the mask later based on the
training pattern.
v2:
- Use a helper instead of open-coding the masking. (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007170917.1764556-2-imre.deak@intel.com
Atm, if a full modeset is performed during the initial modeset the link
training will happen with uninitialized max DP rate and lane count. Make
sure the corresponding encoder state is initialized by adding an encoder
hook called during driver init and system resume.
A better alternative would be to store all states in the CRTC state and
make this state available for the link re-training code. Also instead of
the DPCD read in the hook there should be really a proper sink HW
readout in place. Both of these require a bigger rework, so for now opting
for this minimal fix to make at least full initial modesets work.
The patch is based on
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/101473/?series=10354&rev=3
v2: (Ville)
- s/sanitize_state/sync_state/
- No point in calling the hook when CRTC is disabled, remove the call.
- No point in calling the hook for MST, remove it.
v3: Check only DPCD_REV to avoid clobbering intel_dp->dpcd. (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201005230154.1477653-1-imre.deak@intel.com
On HP 800 G4 DM, if HDMI cable isn't plugged before boot, the HDMI port
becomes useless and never responds to cable hotplugging:
[ 3.031904] [drm:lspcon_init [i915]] *ERROR* Failed to probe lspcon
[ 3.031945] [drm:intel_ddi_init [i915]] *ERROR* LSPCON init failed on port D
Seems like the lspcon chip on the system only gets powered after the
cable is plugged.
Consilidate lspcon_init() into lspcon_resume() to dynamically init
lspcon chip, and make HDMI port work.
v6:
- Rebase on latest for-linux-next.
v5:
- Consolidate lspcon_resume() with lspcon_init().
- Move more logic into lspcon code.
v4:
- Trust VBT in intel_infoframe_init().
- Init lspcon in intel_dp_detect().
v3:
- Make sure it's handled under long HPD case.
v2:
- Move lspcon_init() inside of intel_dp_hpd_pulse().
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/203
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200610075542.12882-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com
Get rid of mode crtc->config usage, and some ad-hoc intel_dp state
usage by plumbing the crtc state all the way down to the link training
code.
Unfortunately we do have to keep some cached state in intel_dp so
that we can do the "does the link need retraining?" checks from
the short hpd handler.
v2: Add intel_crtc_state forward declaration
v3: Don't kill the PHY test code totally since it's
now in the hotplug work where we can get at the states
v4: Don't resurrect the debug scrambling disable bit (Imre)
Use intel_dp_mst_is_master_trans() (Imre)
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201001111053.24451-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Doing any kind modeset stuff from the short hpd handler is
verboten. The ad-hoc PHY test modeset code violates this. And
by calling various link training related functions it's now
blocking further work to plumb the crtc state down into the
link training code.
Let's hack around that by pushing the PHY test stuff into the
hotplug work where it's less of a problem. Still not great but
at least acceptable. We take a few pages from the link retraining
handbook to handle the locking and whatnot.
v2: Fix the intel_dp_hotplug() return value
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200930100412.9313-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
When validating a "YCbCr 4:2:0 only" mode we must take into
account the fact that we're going to be outputting YCbCr
4:2:0 or 4:4:4 (when a DP->HDMI protocol converter is doing
the 4:2:0 downsampling). For YCbCr 4:4:4 the minimum output
bpc is 8, for YCbCr 4:2:0 it'll be half that. The currently
hardcoded 6bpc is only correct for RGB 4:4:4, which we will
never use with these kinds of modes. Figure out what we're
going to output and use the correct min bpp value to validate
whether the link has sufficient bandwidth.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200917214335.3569-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Since the display hardware is all there even when INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED
return false we have to be capable of shutting it down cleanly so
as to not anger the hw. To that end let's reduce the effect of
!INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLE to just treating all outputs as disconnected.
Should prevent anyone from automagically enabling any of them, while
still allowing us to cleanly shut them down.
v2: Put the check into the right place for CRT
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200910164256.25983-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Since DP 1.3, it's been possible for DP receivers to specify an
additional set of DPCD capabilities, which can take precedence over the
capabilities reported at DP_DPCD_REV.
Basically any device supporting DP is going to need to read these in an
identical manner, in particular nouveau, so let's go ahead and just move
this code out of i915 into a shared DRM DP helper that we can use in
other drivers.
v2:
* Remove redundant dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] == 0 check
* Fix drm_dp_dpcd_read() ret checks
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200826182456.322681-20-lyude@redhat.com
And of course, we'll also need to read the sink count from other drivers
as well if we're checking whether or not it's supported. So, let's
extract the code for this into another helper.
v2:
* Fix drm_dp_dpcd_readb() ret check
* Add back comment and move back sink_count assignment in intel_dp_get_dpcd()
v5:
* Change name from drm_dp_get_sink_count() to drm_dp_read_sink_count()
* Also, add "See also:" section to kdocs
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200826182456.322681-17-lyude@redhat.com
Since other drivers are also going to need to be aware of the sink count
in order to do proper dongle detection, we might as well steal i915's
DP_SINK_COUNT helpers and move them into DRM helpers so that other
dirvers can use them as well.
Note that this also starts using intel_dp_has_sink_count() in
intel_dp_detect_dpcd(), which is a functional change.
v5:
* Change name from drm_dp_has_sink_count() to
drm_dp_read_sink_count_cap()
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200826182456.322681-16-lyude@redhat.com
We're going to be doing the same probing process in nouveau for
determining downstream DP port capabilities, so let's deduplicate the
work by moving i915's code for handling this into a shared helper:
drm_dp_read_downstream_info().
Note that when we do this, we also do make some functional changes while
we're at it:
* We always clear the downstream port info before trying to read it,
just to make things easier for the caller
* We skip reading downstream port info if the DPCD indicates that we
don't support downstream port info
* We only read as many bytes as needed for the reported number of
downstream ports, no sense in reading the whole thing every time
v2:
* Fixup logic for calculating the downstream port length to account for
the fact that downstream port caps can be either 1 byte or 4 bytes
long. We can actually skip fixing the max_clock/max_bpc helpers here
since they all check for DP_DETAILED_CAP_INFO_AVAILABLE anyway.
* Fix ret code check for drm_dp_dpcd_read
v5:
* Change name from drm_dp_downstream_read_info() to
drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
* Also, add "See Also" sections for the various downstream info
functions (drm_dp_read_downstream_info(), drm_dp_downstream_max_clock(),
drm_dp_downstream_max_bpc())
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200826182456.322681-14-lyude@redhat.com
