Same story than hid_hw_raw_requests:
This allows to intercept and prevent or change the behavior of
hid_hw_output_report() from a bpf program.
The intent is to solve a couple of use case:
- firewalling a HID device: a firewall can monitor who opens the hidraw
nodes and then prevent or allow access to write operations on that
hidraw node.
- change the behavior of a device and emulate a new HID feature request
The hook is allowed to be run as sleepable so it can itself call
hid_hw_output_report(), which allows to "convert" one feature request into
another or even call the feature request on a different HID device on the
same physical device.
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240626-hid_hw_req_bpf-v2-7-cfd60fb6c79f@kernel.org
Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
This allows to intercept and prevent or change the behavior of
hid_hw_raw_request() from a bpf program.
The intent is to solve a couple of use case:
- firewalling a HID device: a firewall can monitor who opens the hidraw
nodes and then prevent or allow access to write operations on that
hidraw node.
- change the behavior of a device and emulate a new HID feature request
The hook is allowed to be run as sleepable so it can itself call
hid_bpf_hw_request(), which allows to "convert" one feature request into
another or even call the feature request on a different HID device on the
same physical device.
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240626-hid_hw_req_bpf-v2-4-cfd60fb6c79f@kernel.org
Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
We want to add sleepable callbacks for hid_hw_raw_request() and
hid_hw_output_report(), but we can not use a plain RCU for those.
Prepare for a SRCU so we can extend HID-BPF.
This changes a little bit how hid_bpf_device_init() behaves, as it may
now fail, so there is a tiny hid-core.c change to accommodate for this.
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240626-hid_hw_req_bpf-v2-3-cfd60fb6c79f@kernel.org
Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
It is useful to change the name, the phys and/or the uniq of a
struct hid_device during .rdesc_fixup().
For example, hid-uclogic.ko changes the uniq to store the firmware version
to differentiate between 2 devices sharing the same PID. In the same
way, changing the device name is useful when the device export 3 nodes,
all with the same name.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240608-hid_bpf_struct_ops-v3-16-6ac6ade58329@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
We do this implementation in several steps to not have the CI failing:
- first (this patch), we add struct_ops while keeping the existing infra
available
- then we change the selftests, the examples and the existing in-tree
HID-BPF programs
- then we remove the existing trace points making old HID-BPF obsolete
There are a few advantages of struct_ops over tracing:
- compatibility with sleepable programs (for hid_hw_raw_request() in
a later patch)
- a lot simpler in the kernel: it's a simple rcu protected list
- we can add more parameters to the function called without much trouble
- the "attach" is now generic through BPF-core: the caller just needs to
set hid_id and flags before calling __load().
- all the BPF tough part is not handled in BPF-core through generic
processing
- hid_bpf_ctx is now only writable where it needs be
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240608-hid_bpf_struct_ops-v3-3-6ac6ade58329@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
