In MLO, we have a per-link debugfs directory which contains the
per-link files. In case of non-MLO we would like to put the per-link
files in the netdev directory to keep it how it was before MLO.
- Upon interface creation the netdev will be created with the per-link
files in it.
- Upon switching to MLO: delete the entire netdev directory and then
recreate it without the per-link files. Then the per-link directories
with the per-link files in it will be created in ieee80211_link_init()
- Upon switching to non-MLO: delete the entire netdev directory
(including the per-link directories) and recreate it with the per-link
files in it.
Note that this also aligns to always call the vif link debugfs
method for the deflink as promised in the documentation, which
wasn't done before.
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928172905.082e698caca9.I5bef7b2026e0f58b4a958b3d1f459ac5baeccfc9@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Since we're now protecting everything with the wiphy mutex
(and were really using it for almost everything before),
there's no longer any real reason to have a separate wdev
mutex. It may feel better, but really has no value.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the local->mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the key_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the sta_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Again this should be per link and will get cancellation
issues, move it to a wiphy work.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This work should be made per link as well, and then
will have cancellation issues. Moving it to a wiphy
work already fixes those beforehand.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Move the DFS CAC work over to hold the wiphy lock
there without worry about work cancellation.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
There are cases where keeping sdata locked for an operation. Add a
variant that does not take sdata lock to permit these usecases.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
There are some locking changes that will later otherwise
cause conflicts, so merge wireless into wireless-next to
avoid those.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
During link switching, the active links change, so we need to
recalculate the aggregate data in the stations.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Implement an API function and debugfs file to switch
active links.
Also provide an async version of the API so drivers
can call it in arbitrary contexts, e.g. while in the
authorized callback.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
In order to let the driver select active links and properly
make multi-link connections, as a first step isolate the
driver from inactive links, and set the active links to be
only the association link for client-side interfaces. For
AP side nothing changes since APs always have to have all
their links active.
To simplify things, update the for_each_sta_active_link()
API to include the appropriate vif pointer.
This also implies not allocating a chanctx for an inactive
link, which requires a few more changes.
Since we now no longer try to program multiple links to the
driver, remove the check in the MLME code.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We probably should've done that originally, we already have
about 300 lines of code there, and will add more. Move all
the link code we wrote to a new file.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
