In the ensure_good_fd function, if the fcntl function succeeds but
the close function fails, ensure_good_fd returns a normal fd and
sets errno, which may cause users to misunderstand. The close
failure is not a serious problem, and the correct FD has been
handed over to the upper-layer application. Let's restore errno here.
Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <liuxin350@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221223133618.10323-1-liuxin350@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Show the real problem instead of just saying "No such file or directory".
Now will print below info:
libbpf: failed to find '.BTF' ELF section in /home/changbin/work/linux/vmlinux
Error: failed to load BTF from /home/changbin/work/linux/vmlinux: No such file or directory
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221217223509.88254-2-changbin.du@gmail.com
Clang warns on 32-bit ARM on this comparision:
libbpf.c:10497:18: error: result of comparison of constant 4294967296 with expression of type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned int') is always false [-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
if (ref_ctr_off >= (1ULL << PERF_UPROBE_REF_CTR_OFFSET_BITS))
~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Typecast ref_ctr_off to __u64 in the check conditional, it is false on
32bit anyways.
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221219191526.296264-1-raj.khem@gmail.com
To resolve a trivial merge conflict with c302378bc1 ("libbpf:
Hashmap interface update to allow both long and void* keys/values"),
where a function present upstream was removed in the perf tools
development tree.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Fix bug in btf_dump's logic of determining if a given struct type is
packed or not. The notion of "natural alignment" is not needed and is
even harmful in this case, so drop it altogether. The biggest difference
in btf_is_struct_packed() compared to its original implementation is
that we don't really use btf__align_of() to determine overall alignment
of a struct type (because it could be 1 for both packed and non-packed
struct, depending on specifci field definitions), and just use field's
actual alignment to calculate whether any field is requiring packing or
struct's size overall necessitates packing.
Add two simple test cases that demonstrate the difference this change
would make.
Fixes: ea2ce1ba99 ("libbpf: Fix BTF-to-C converter's padding logic")
Reported-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221215183605.4149488-1-andrii@kernel.org
Turns out that btf_dump API doesn't handle a bunch of tricky corner
cases, as reported by Per, and further discovered using his testing
Python script ([0]).
This patch revamps btf_dump's padding logic significantly, making it
more correct and also avoiding unnecessary explicit padding, where
compiler would pad naturally. This overall topic turned out to be very
tricky and subtle, there are lots of subtle corner cases. The comments
in the code tries to give some clues, but comments themselves are
supposed to be paired with good understanding of C alignment and padding
rules. Plus some experimentation to figure out subtle things like
whether `long :0;` means that struct is now forced to be long-aligned
(no, it's not, turns out).
Anyways, Per's script, while not completely correct in some known
situations, doesn't show any obvious cases where this logic breaks, so
this is a nice improvement over the previous state of this logic.
Some selftests had to be adjusted to accommodate better use of natural
alignment rules, eliminating some unnecessary padding, or changing it to
`type: 0;` alignment markers.
Note also that for when we are in between bitfields, we emit explicit
bit size, while otherwise we use `: 0`, this feels much more natural in
practice.
Next patch will add few more test cases, found through randomized Per's
script.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/85f83c333f5355c8ac026f835b18d15060725fcb.camel@ericsson.com/
Reported-by: Per Sundström XP <per.xp.sundstrom@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-6-andrii@kernel.org
btf__align_of() is supposed to be return alignment requirement of
a requested BTF type. For STRUCT/UNION it doesn't always return correct
value, because it calculates alignment only based on field types. But
for packed structs this is not enough, we need to also check field
offsets and struct size. If field offset isn't aligned according to
field type's natural alignment, then struct must be packed. Similarly,
if struct size is not a multiple of struct's natural alignment, then
struct must be packed as well.
This patch fixes this issue precisely by additionally checking these
conditions.
Fixes: 3d208f4ca1 ("libbpf: Expose btf__align_of() API")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-5-andrii@kernel.org
Turns out C allows to force enum to be 1-byte or 8-byte explicitly using
mode(byte) or mode(word), respecticely. Linux sources are using this in
some cases. This is imporant to handle correctly, as enum size
determines corresponding fields in a struct that use that enum type. And
if enum size is incorrect, this will lead to invalid struct layout. So
add mode(byte) and mode(word) attribute support to btf_dump APIs.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-3-andrii@kernel.org
btf_dump APIs emit unnecessary tabs when emitting struct/union
definition that fits on the single line. Before this patch we'd get:
struct blah {<tab>};
This patch fixes this and makes sure that we get more natural:
struct blah {};
Fixes: 44a726c3f2 ("bpftool: Print newline before '}' for struct with padding only fields")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221212211505.558851-2-andrii@kernel.org
This is a small improvement in libbpf_strerror. When libbpf_strerror
is used to obtain the system error description, if the length of the
buf is insufficient, libbpf_sterror returns ERANGE and sets errno to
ERANGE.
However, this processing is not performed when the error code
customized by libbpf is obtained. Make some minor improvements here,
return -ERANGE and set errno to ERANGE when buf is not enough for
custom description.
Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <liuxin350@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221210082045.233697-1-liuxin350@huawei.com
Parse USDT arguments like "8@(%rsp)" on x86. These are emmited by
SystemTap. The argument syntax is similar to the existing "memory
dereference case" but the offset left out as it's zero (i.e. read
the value from the address in the register). We treat it the same
as the the "memory dereference case", but set the offset to 0.
I've tested that this fixes the "unrecognized arg #N spec: 8@(%rsp).."
error I've run into when attaching to a probe with such an argument.
Attaching and reading the correct argument values works.
Something similar might be needed for the other supported
architectures.
[0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/559
Signed-off-by: Timo Hunziker <timo.hunziker@gmx.ch>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221203123746.2160-1-timo.hunziker@eclipso.ch
C++ enum forward declarations are fundamentally not compatible with pure
C enum definitions, and so libbpf's use of `enum bpf_stats_type;`
forward declaration in libbpf/bpf.h public API header is causing C++
compilation issues.
More details can be found in [0], but it comes down to C++ supporting
enum forward declaration only with explicitly specified backing type:
enum bpf_stats_type: int;
In C (and I believe it's a GCC extension also), such forward declaration
is simply:
enum bpf_stats_type;
Further, in Linux UAPI this enum is defined in pure C way:
enum bpf_stats_type { BPF_STATS_RUN_TIME = 0; }
And even though in both cases backing type is int, which can be
confirmed by looking at DWARF information, for C++ compiler actual enum
definition and forward declaration are incompatible.
To eliminate this problem, for C++ mode define input argument as int,
which makes enum unnecessary in libbpf public header. This solves the
issue and as demonstrated by next patch doesn't cause any unwanted
compiler warnings, at least with default warnings setting.
[0] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42766839/c11-enum-forward-causes-underlying-type-mismatch
[1] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/249
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221130200013.2997831-1-andrii@kernel.org
Currently LLVM fails to recognize .data.* as data section and defaults to .text
section. Later BPF backend tries to emit 4-byte NOP instruction which doesn't
exist in BPF ISA and aborts.
The fix for LLVM is pending:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138477
While waiting for the fix lets workaround the linked_list test case
by using .bss.* prefix which is properly recognized by LLVM as BSS section.
Fix libbpf to support .bss. prefix and adjust tests.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Similar with the overflow problem on ringbuf mmap, in user_ringbuf_map()
2 * max_entries may overflow u32 when mapping writeable region.
Fixing it by casting the size of writable mmap region into a __u64 and
checking whether or not there will be overflow during mmap.
Fixes: b66ccae01f ("bpf: Add libbpf logic for user-space ring buffer")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221116072351.1168938-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com
The maximum size of ringbuf is 2GB on x86-64 host, so 2 * max_entries
will overflow u32 when mapping producer page and data pages. Only
casting max_entries to size_t is not enough, because for 32-bits
application on 64-bits kernel the size of read-only mmap region
also could overflow size_t.
So fixing it by casting the size of read-only mmap region into a __u64
and checking whether or not there will be overflow during mmap.
Fixes: bf99c936f9 ("libbpf: Add BPF ring buffer support")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221116072351.1168938-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Using page size as max_entries when probing ring buffer map, else the
probe may fail on host with 64KB page size (e.g., an ARM64 host).
After the fix, the output of "bpftool feature" on above host will be
correct.
Before :
eBPF map_type ringbuf is NOT available
eBPF map_type user_ringbuf is NOT available
After :
eBPF map_type ringbuf is available
eBPF map_type user_ringbuf is available
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221116072351.1168938-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
The perf/cpumap.h header is getting the 'struct perf_cpu_map' forward
declaration by luck, add it.
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
It just hits the header guard, becoming a no-op, ditch it.
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Fixed following checkpatch issues:
WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
+ * other BPF program's BTF object */
WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'be'
+ * name. This is important to be be able to find corresponding BTF
ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent
+ switch (ext->kcfg.sz) {
+ case 1: *(__u8 *)ext_val = value; break;
+ case 2: *(__u16 *)ext_val = value; break;
+ case 4: *(__u32 *)ext_val = value; break;
+ case 8: *(__u64 *)ext_val = value; break;
+ default:
ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
+ case 1: *(__u8 *)ext_val = value; break;
ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
+ case 2: *(__u16 *)ext_val = value; break;
ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
+ case 4: *(__u32 *)ext_val = value; break;
ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
+ case 8: *(__u64 *)ext_val = value; break;
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
+ }$
WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
+ }$
WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
+ * for faster search */
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
+^I^I^I^I^I^I &ext->kcfg.is_signed);$
WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
+ if (err) {
+ return err;
+ }
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
+^I^I^I^I sizeof(*obj->btf_modules), obj->btf_module_cnt + 1);$
Signed-off-by: Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221113190648.38556-3-tegongkang@gmail.com
GCC 11.3.0 fails to compile btf_dump.c due to the following error,
which seems to originate in btf_dump_struct_data where the returned
value would be uninitialized if btf_vlen returns zero.
btf_dump.c: In function ‘btf_dump_dump_type_data’:
btf_dump.c:2363:12: error: ‘err’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
2363 | if (err < 0)
| ^
Fixes: 920d16af9b ("libbpf: BTF dumper support for typed data")
Signed-off-by: David Michael <fedora.dm0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Acked-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87zgcu60hq.fsf@gmail.com
Resolve forward declarations that don't take part in type graphs
comparisons if declaration name is unambiguous. Example:
CU #1:
struct foo; // standalone forward declaration
struct foo *some_global;
CU #2:
struct foo { int x; };
struct foo *another_global;
The `struct foo` from CU #1 is not a part of any definition that is
compared against another definition while `btf_dedup_struct_types`
processes structural types. The the BTF after `btf_dedup_struct_types`
the BTF looks as follows:
[1] STRUCT 'foo' size=4 vlen=1 ...
[2] INT 'int' size=4 ...
[3] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1
[4] FWD 'foo' fwd_kind=struct
[5] PTR '(anon)' type_id=4
This commit adds a new pass `btf_dedup_resolve_fwds`, that maps such
forward declarations to structs or unions with identical name in case
if the name is not ambiguous.
The pass is positioned before `btf_dedup_ref_types` so that types
[3] and [5] could be merged as a same type after [1] and [4] are merged.
The final result for the example above looks as follows:
[1] STRUCT 'foo' size=4 vlen=1
'x' type_id=2 bits_offset=0
[2] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
[3] PTR '(anon)' type_id=1
For defconfig kernel with BTF enabled this removes 63 forward
declarations. Examples of removed declarations: `pt_regs`, `in6_addr`.
The running time of `btf__dedup` function is increased by about 3%.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221109142611.879983-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
An update for libbpf's hashmap interface from void* -> void* to a
polymorphic one, allowing both long and void* keys and values.
This simplifies many use cases in libbpf as hashmaps there are mostly
integer to integer.
Perf copies hashmap implementation from libbpf and has to be
updated as well.
Changes to libbpf, selftests/bpf and perf are packed as a single
commit to avoid compilation issues with any future bisect.
Polymorphic interface is acheived by hiding hashmap interface
functions behind auxiliary macros that take care of necessary
type casts, for example:
#define hashmap_cast_ptr(p) \
({ \
_Static_assert((p) == NULL || sizeof(*(p)) == sizeof(long),\
#p " pointee should be a long-sized integer or a pointer"); \
(long *)(p); \
})
bool hashmap_find(const struct hashmap *map, long key, long *value);
#define hashmap__find(map, key, value) \
hashmap_find((map), (long)(key), hashmap_cast_ptr(value))
- hashmap__find macro casts key and value parameters to long
and long* respectively
- hashmap_cast_ptr ensures that value pointer points to a memory
of appropriate size.
This hack was suggested by Andrii Nakryiko in [1].
This is a follow up for [2].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZ8KFneEJxFAaNCCFPGqp20hSpS2aCj76uRk3-qZUH5xg@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/af1facf9-7bc8-8a3d-0db4-7b3f333589a2@meta.com/T/#m65b28f1d6d969fcd318b556db6a3ad499a42607d
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221109142611.879983-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
