soc_cleanup_card_resources() will call card->remove(), but it should be
called if card->probe() or card->late_probe() are called.
snd_soc_bind_card() might be error before calling
card->probe() / card->late_probe().
In that time, card->remove() will be called.
This patch adds card_probed parameter to judge it.
Fixes: bfce78a559 ("ASoC: soc-core: tidyup soc_init_dai_link()")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o8xg4ltr.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.
snd_soc_bind_card() is calling snd_soc_dapm_init() for both
card and component.
Let's call paired snd_soc_dapm_shutdown() at paired
soc_cleanup_card_resources().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r22c4lub.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
snd_soc_bind_card() is calling many initialize functions
for each card / link / dai / aux etc, etc, etc...
When error happen, the message is indicated at snd_soc_bind_card(),
not at each functions.
But, only soc_probe_aux_devices() case is indicating error at functions,
not at snd_soc_bind_card().
It is not an issue, but unbalanced.
This patch moves error message to snd_soc_bind_card().
Also avoids deep-nested code.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lfsthkw9.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We don't need to separete snd_soc_add_dai_link() and
soc_bind_dai_link() anymore. Let's merge these.
One note is that before this patch, it adds list (A)
eventhough if it had dai_link->ignore (1), or already bounded dai_link (2).
But I guess it is wrong. This patch also solve this issue.
/* BEFORE */
int soc_bind_dai_link(...)
{
...
(1) if (dai_link->ignore)
return 0;
(2) if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...))
return 0;
...
}
int snd_soc_add_dai_link(...)
{
...
=> ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...);
=> if (ret < 0)
=> return ret;
(A) list_add_tail(&dai_link->list, &card->dai_link_list);
...
}
/* AFTER */
int snd_soc_add_dai_link(...)
{
...
(1) if (dai_link->ignore)
return 0;
(2) if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...))
return 0;
...
(A) list_add_tail(&dai_link->list, &card->dai_link_list);
return 0;
}
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r22lhkx8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
snd_soc_unregister_component() is calling snd_soc_lookup_component()
under mutex_lock(). But, snd_soc_lookup_component() itself is using
mutex_lock(), thus it will be dead-lock.
This patch adds _nolocked version of it, and avoid dead-lock issue.
Fixes: ac6a4dd3e9f0("ASoC: soc-core: use snd_soc_lookup_component() at snd_soc_unregister_component()")
Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>"
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87bltph4da.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
soc-core has some API which is used from topology, but it is doing
topology specific operation at soc-core.
soc-core should care about core things, and topology should care
about topology things, otherwise, it is very confusable.
For example topology type is not related to soc-core,
it is topology side issue.
This patch removes meaningless check from soc-core.
This patch keeps extra initialization/destruction at
snd_soc_add_dai_link() / snd_soc_remove_dai_link()
which were for topology.
From this patch, non-topology card can use it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87pni6251h.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ALSA SoC has 2 functions.
snd_soc_register_dai() is used from topology
snd_soc_register_dais() is used from snd_soc_add_component()
In general, people think like _dai() is called from _dais()
with for loop. But in reality, these are very similar
but different implementation.
We shouldn't have duplicated and confusing implementation.
snd_soc_register_dai() is now used from topology.
But to reduce duplicated code, it should be used from _dais(), too.
Because of topology side specific reason,
it is calling snd_soc_dapm_new_dai_widgets(),
but it is not needed _dais() side.
This patch factorizes snd_soc_register_dai() to
topology / _dais() common part, and topology specific part.
And do topology specific part at soc-topology.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sgn2251p.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ALSA SoC has 2 functions.
snd_soc_register_dai() is used from topology
snd_soc_register_dais() is used from snd_soc_add_component()
In general, people think like _dai() is called from _dais()
with for loop. But in reality, these are very similar
but different implementation.
We shouldn't have duplicated and confusing implementation.
snd_soc_register_dai() is now used from topology.
But to reduce duplicated code, it should be used from _dais(), too.
To prepare it, this patch adds missing parameter legacy_dai_naming
to snd_soc_register_dai().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tv7i251u.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and is difficult to debug.
Now ALSA SoC has snd_soc_add_component(), but there is no paired
snd_soc_del_component(). Thus, snd_soc_unregister_component() is
calling cleanup function randomly. it is difficult to read.
This patch adds missing snd_soc_del_component_unlocked() and
balance up code.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8736f23jn4.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.
ALSA SoC has soc_bind_dai_link(), but its paired soc_unbind_dai_link()
is not implemented.
More confusable is that soc_remove_pcm_runtimes() which should be
soc_unbind_dai_link() is implemented without synchronised
to soc_bind_dai_link().
This patch cleanup this unbalance.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/877e4e3jni.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
If we focus to soc_bind_dai_link() at snd_soc_instantiate_card(),
we will notice very complex operation.
static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(...)
{
...
/*
* (1) Bind dai_link via card pre-linked dai_link
*
* Bind dai_link via card pre-linked.
* 1 dai_link will be 1 rtd, and connected to card.
* for_each_card_prelinks() is for card pre-linked dai_link.
*
* Image
*
* card
* - rtd(A)
* - rtd(A)
*/
for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link) {
ret = soc_bind_dai_link(card, dai_link);
...
}
...
/*
* (2) Connect card pre-linked dai_link to card list
*
* Connect all card pre-linked dai_link to *card list*.
* Here, (A) means from card pre-linked.
*
* Image
*
* card card list
* - rtd(A) - dai_link(A)
* - rtd(A) - dai_link(A)
* - ... - ...
*/
for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link) {
ret = snd_soc_add_dai_link(card, dai_link);
...
}
...
/*
* (3) Probe binded component
*
* Each rtd has many components.
* Here probes each rtd connected components.
* rtd(A) in Image is the probe target.
*
* During this component probe, topology may add new dai_link to
* *card list* by using snd_soc_add_dai_link() which is
* used at (2).
* Here, (B) means from topology
*
* Image
*
* card card list
* - rtd(A) - dai_link(A)
* - rtd(A) - dai_link(A)
* - ... - ...
* - dai_link(B)
* - dai_link(B)
*/
ret = soc_probe_link_components(card);
...
/*
* (4) Bind dai_link again
*
* Bind dai_link again for topology.
* Note, (1) used for_each_card_prelinks(),
* here is using for_each_card_links()
*
* This means from card list.
* As Image indicating, it has dai_link(A) (from card pre-link)
* and dai_link(B) (from topology).
* main target here is dai_link(B).
* soc_bind_dai_link() ignores already used
* dai_link (= dai_link(A))
*
* Image
*
* card card list
* - rtd(A) - dai_link(A)
* - rtd(A) - dai_link(A)
* - ... - ...
* - rtd(B) - dai_link(B)
* - rtd(B) - dai_link(B)
*/
for_each_card_links(card, dai_link) {
ret = soc_bind_dai_link(card, dai_link);
...
}
...
}
As you see above, it is doing very complex method.
The problem is binding dai_link via "card pre-linked" (= (1)) and
"topology added dai_link" (= (3)) are separated.
The code can be simple if we can bind dai_link when dai_link
is connected to *card list*.
This patch do it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878sou3jnn.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
soc_is_dai_link_bound() check will be called both
*before* soc_bind_dai_link() (A), and
*under* soc_bind_dai_link() (B).
These are very verbose code. Let's remove one of them.
* static int soc_bind_dai_link(...)
{
...
(B) if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...)) {
...
return 0;
}
...
}
static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(...)
{
...
for_each_card_links(...) {
(A) if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...))
continue;
* ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...);
if (ret)
goto probe_end;
}
...
}
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a79a3jns.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
soc_init_dai_link() is needed to be called before soc_bind_dai_link().
int snd_soc_instantiate_card()
{
for_each_card_prelinks(...) {
(1) ret = soc_init_dai_link(...);
...
}
...
for_each_card_prelinks(...) {
(2) ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...);
...
}
...
for_each_card_links(...) {
...
(A) ret = soc_init_dai_link(...);
...
(B) ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...);
}
...
(1) is for (2), and (A) is for (B)
(1) and (2) are for card prelink dai_link.
(A) and (B) are for topology added dai_link.
soc_init_dai_link() is sanity check for dai_link, not initializing today.
Therefore, it is confusable naming. We can rename it as sanity_check.
And this check is for soc_bind_dai_link().
It can be more simple code if we can call it from soc_bind_dai_link().
This patch renames it to soc_dai_link_sanity_check(), and
call it from soc_bind_dai_link().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87d0e63joh.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
snd_soc_tplg_component_remove() is pair of snd_soc_tplg_component_load(),
and it is topology related cleanup function.
The driver which called _load() needs to call _remove() by its responsibility.
Today, skl-pcm and topology are the user, and these are calling both
_load() and _remove().
soc-core doesn't need to call it.
This patch remove it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8736fbdnwt.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ALSA SoC has for_each_rtdcom() which is link list for
rtd-component which is called as rtdcom. The relationship image is like below
rtdcom rtdcom rtdcom
component component component
rtd->component_list -> list -> list -> list ...
Here, the pointer get via normal link list is rtdcom,
Thus, current for_each loop is like below, and need to get
component via rtdcom->component
for_each_rtdcom(rtd, rtdcom) {
component = rtdcom->component;
...
}
but usually, user want to get pointer from for_each_xxx is component
directly, like below.
for_each_rtd_component(rtd, rtdcom, component) {
...
}
This patch expands list_for_each_entry manually, and enable to get
component directly from for_each macro.
Because of it, the macro becoming difficult to read,
but macro itself becoming useful.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878spm64m4.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
dai / component related resources are created when component is
registered, and it will be freed when component was unregistered.
These resources are not re-used after that.
This means, we can use devm_xxx for dai / component, without
thinking about kfree().
This patch uses devm_xxx for these.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8736gbbu1a.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.
soc_cleanup_card_resources() (a) which is paired function of
snd_soc_instantiate_card() (A) is calling soc_remove_dai_links() (*)
to remove card related resources, but it is breaking
add/remove balance (B)(b)(C)(c)(D)(d), in other words
these should be called from soc_cleanup_card_resources() (a)
from balance point of view.
More headacke is that it is using original removing method for
dai_link even though we already have snd_soc_remove_dai_link()
which is the function for it (d).
This patch removes snd_soc_remove_dai_links() and balance up code.
static void soc_remove_dai_links(...)
{
...
(b) soc_remove_link_dais(card);
(c) soc_remove_link_components(card);
for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link) {
...
/* it should use snd_soc_remove_dai_link() here */
(d) list_del(&link->list);
}
}
(a) static int soc_cleanup_card_resources(...)
{
...
/* remove and free each DAI */
(*) soc_remove_dai_links(card);
...
}
(A) static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(struct snd_soc_card *card)
{
...
/* add predefined DAI links to the list */
for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link)
(B) snd_soc_add_dai_link(card, dai_link);
...
/* probe all components used by DAI links on this card */
(C) ret = soc_probe_link_components(card);
...
/* probe all DAI links on this card */
(D) ret = soc_probe_link_dais(card);
...
}
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875zl7bu1r.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current rtd, rtd->dev, rtd->codec_dais are created by normal kzalloc(),
but we want to use devm_kzalloc() as much as possible.
Created rtd->dev is registered by device_register() at
soc_new_pcm_runtime(), and it will be freed at
soc_free_pcm_runtime() by device_unregister().
This means, if we can use devm_kzalloc(rtd->dev, xxx) for
rtd / rtd->codec_dais, all these are automatically freed
via soc_free_pcm_runtime().
This patch uses devm_kzalloc(rtd->dev, xxx) for rtd / rtd->codec_dais.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/877e5nbu1z.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
"rtd" is handled by soc_xxx_pcm_runtime(), and
"rtd->dev" is handled by soc_rtd_xxx().
There is no reason to separate these, and it makes code complex.
We can free these in the same time.
Here soc_rtd_free() (A) which frees rtd->dev is called from
soc_remove_link_dais() many times (1).
Then, it is using dev_registered flags to avoid multi kfree() (2).
This is no longer needed if we can merge these functions.
static void soc_remove_link_dais(...)
{
...
(1) for_each_comp_order(order) {
(1) for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd) {
(A) soc_rtd_free(rtd);
...
}
}
}
(A) static void soc_rtd_free(...)
{
(2) if (rtd->dev_registered) {
/* we don't need to call kfree() for rtd->dev */
device_unregister(rtd->dev);
(2) rtd->dev_registered = 0;
}
}
This patch merges soc_rtd_free() into soc_free_pcm_runtime().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878squf7oi.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC is calling list_del(&rtd->list) at (1)
static void soc_remove_pcm_runtimes(...)
{
...
for_each_card_rtds_safe(card, rtd, _rtd) {
(1) list_del(&rtd->list);
(2) soc_free_pcm_runtime(rtd);
}
...
}
But, we will call soc_free_pcm_runtime() after that (2).
&rtd->list is connected at soc_new_pcm_runtime(),
Thus, it should be disconnected at soc_free_pcm_runtime().
This patch calls list_del(&rtd->list) at soc_free_pcm_runtime().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87d0g6f7s5.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
