Declare the available DVO/SDVO/HDMI/DP/DDI ports in the
device info. The other outputs (LVDS/TV/DSI/VGA) are left
out since for most of them we don't consider them as "ports".
DSI we should probably perhaps include somehow in the device
info. Just not sure how. Or we just introduce a HAS_DSI() and
call it a day?
TODO: figure out what to do about the subplatform stuff. Would
it be better to declare those directly with a different
device info or not? Also not sure the icl port-f stuff
matters even. Bspec claims there are icl SKUs with far
less ports than that and we don't seem to check for those
either?
v2: Fix TC5 vs. TC6 mixup on TGL (Jani)
Drop DDI C for now on TGL, and add a FIXME (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230616140820.11726-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Moving display-specific runtime info initialization into display/ makes
the display code more self-contained and also makes it easier to call
from the Xe driver.
v2:
- Drop unnecessary display/ prefix from #includes. (Jani)
- Clear runtime info if fusing leaves no pipes remaining, the same as
we do when fusing indicates the entire display controller is
unavailable. (Jani)
- Move adjustment of DRIVER_MODESET / DRIVER_ATOMIC after call to
intel_display_device_info_runtime_init(); HAS_DISPLAY may have
changed to false during the runtime init. (Jani)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230602181450.1151368-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
For platforms with GMD_ID support (i.e., everything MTL and beyond),
identification of the display IP present should be based on the contents
of the GMD_ID register rather than a PCI devid match.
Note that since GMD_ID readout requires access to the PCI BAR, a slight
change to the driver init sequence is needed --- pci_enable_device() is
now called before i915_driver_create().
v2:
- Fix use of uninitialized i915 pointer in error path if
pci_enable_device() fails before the i915 device is created. (lkp)
- Use drm_device parameter to intel_display_device_probe. This goes
against i915 conventions, but since the primary goal here is to make
it easy to call this function from other drivers (like Xe) and since
we don't need anything from the i915 structure, this seems like an
exception where drm_device is a more natural fit.
v3:
- Go back do drm_i915_private for intel_display_device_probe. (Jani)
- Move forward decl to top of header. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230523195609.73627-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Rather than selecting the display IP and feature flags at the same time
the general PCI probing happens, move this step into the display code
itself so that it can be more easily re-used outside of i915 (i.e., by
the Xe driver).
v2:
- Make intel_display_device_probe() always return a non-NULL pointer
and simplify copying of runtime_defaults. (Andrzej)
v3:
- Redefine INTEL_VGA_DEVICE/INTEL_QUANTA_DEVICE to eliminate a cast and
an include of linux/mod_devicetable.h. (Jani)
- Keep explicit memcpy for runtime defaults. (Jani)
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230523195609.73627-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Rather than embeddeding the display's device info within the main device
info structure, just provide a pointer to the display-specific
structure. This is in preparation for moving the display device info
definitions into the display code itself and for eventually allowing the
pointer to be assigned at runtime on platforms that use GMD_ID for
device identification.
In the future, this will also eventually allow the same display device
info structures to be used outside the current i915 code (e.g., from the
Xe driver).
v2:
- Move introduction of DISPLAY_INFO() to this patch. (Andrzej)
v3:
- Also use DISPLAY_INFO() in intel_display_reg_defs.h. (Andrzej)
- Use "{}" instead of "{ 0 }" for empty struct init. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230523195609.73627-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
The goal has been to just make device info a pointer to static const
data, i.e. the static const structs in i915_pci.c. See [1]. However,
there were issues with intel_device_info_runtime_init() clearing the
display sub-struct of device info on the !HAS_DISPLAY() path, which
consequently disables a lot of display functionality, like it
should. Looks like we'd have to cover all those paths, and maybe
sprinkle HAS_DISPLAY() checks in them, which we haven't gotten around
to.
In the mean time, hide mkwrite_device_info() better within
intel_device_info.c by adding a intel_device_info_driver_create() for
the very early initialization of the device info and initial runtime
info. This also lets us declutter i915_drv.h a bit, and stops promoting
mkwrite_device_info() as something that could be used.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/a0422f0a8ac055f65b7922bcd3119b180a41e79e.1655712106.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230411105643.292416-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Move a handful of key enums to a new file intel_display_limits.h. These
are the enum types, and the MAX/NUM enumerations within them, that are
used in other headers. Otherwise, there's no common theme between them.
Replace intel_display.h include with intel_display_limit.h where
relevant, and add the intel_display.h include directly in the .c files
where needed.
Since intel_display.h is used almost everywhere in display/, include it
from intel_display_types.h to avoid massive changes across the
board. There are very few files that would need intel_display_types.h
but not intel_display.h so this is neglible, and further cleanup between
these headers can be left for the future.
Overall this change drops the direct and indirect dependencies on
intel_display.h from about 300 to about 100 compilation units, because
we can drop the include from i915_drv.h.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230116164644.1752009-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Turns out many of the files that need i915_reg.h get it implicitly via
{display/intel_de.h, gt/intel_context.h} -> i915_trace.h -> i915_irq.h
-> i915_reg.h. Since i915_trace.h doesn't actually need i915_irq.h,
makes sense to drop it, but that requires adding quite a few new
includes all over the place.
Prefer including i915_reg.h where needed instead of adding another
implicit include, because eventually we'll want to split up i915_reg.h
and only include the specific registers at each place.
Also some places actually needed i915_irq.h too.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e78a2e0ac1bffaf5af3b5ccc21dff05e6518cef.1668008071.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Currently we do the DRIVER_ATOMIC disable as almost the
first thing during pci probe. That involves the use of
DISPLAY_VER() which is perhaps a bit sketchy now that we
may need to read that out from the hardware itself.
Looks like we do populate a default value for it anyway
so the current does at least still work.
But let's make this safer anyway and move the code
into intel_device_info_runtime_init() where we also
handle the same thing for the !HAS_DISPLAY case.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221007211108.3883-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Commit 00c6cbfd4e ("drm/i915: move pipe_mask and cpu_transcoder_mask
to runtime info") moved the pipe_mask member from struct
intel_device_info to intel_runtime_info, but overlooked some of our
platforms initializing device info .display = {}. This is significant,
as pipe_mask is the single point of truth for a device having a display
or not; the platforms in question left pipe_mask to whatever was set for
the platforms they "inherit" from in the complex macro scheme we have.
Add new NO_DISPLAY macro initializing .__runtime.pipe_mask = 0, which
will cause the device info .display sub-struct to be zeroed in
intel_device_info_runtime_init(). A better solution (or simply audit of
proper use of HAS_DISPLAY() checks) is required before moving forward
with [1].
Also clear all the display related members in runtime info if there's no
display. The latter is a bit tedious, but it's for completeness at this
time, to ensure similar functionality as before.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/dfda1bf67f02ceb07c280b7a13216405fd1f7a34.1660137416.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Fixes: 00c6cbfd4e ("drm/i915: move pipe_mask and cpu_transcoder_mask to runtime info")
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhort <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220916082642.3451961-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Going forward, the hardware teams no longer consider new platforms to
have a "generation" in the way we've defined it for past platforms.
Instead, each IP block (graphics, media, display) will have their own
architecture major.minor versions and stepping ID's which should be read
directly from a register in the MMIO space.
Bspec: 63361, 64111
v2:
- Move the IP version readout to intel_device_info.c
- Convert the macro into a function
v3:
- Move subplatform init to runtime early init
- Cache runtime ver, release info to compare with hardware values.
- Use IP_VER for snaity check(MattR)
v4:
- Minor doccumentation changes.
- Normalize HAS_GMD_ID macro value.(JaniN)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220916014648.1310346-2-radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com
Sync up with v5.18-rc1, in particular to get 5e3094cfd9
("drm/i915/xehpsdv: Add has_flat_ccs to device info").
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
In the past we had a need to differentiate TGL U and TGL Y, there
was a different voltage swing table for each subplatform and some PCI
ids of this subplatforms are shared but it turned out that it was a
specification mistake and the voltage swing table was indeed the same
but we went ahead with that patch because we needed to differentiate
TGL U and Y from TGL H and by that time TGL H was embargoed so that
was the perfect way to land it upstream.
Now the embargo for TGL H is long past and now we even have
INTEL_TGL_12_GT1_IDS with all TGL H ids, so we can drop this PCI root
check and only rely in the PCI ids to differentiate TGL U and Y from
TGL H that actually has code differences.
Besides the simplification this will fix issues in virtualization
environments where the PCI root is virtualized and don't have the same
id as actual hardware.
v2:
- add and set INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_UY
Cc: Fred Gao <fred.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Tested-by: Yu He <yu.he@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220222141424.35165-1-jose.souza@intel.com
