The DSDTs of CHT devices using the Dollar Cove TI PMIC, all use
LDO1 - LDO14 names for the DSDT power opregion field names.
Add comments with these fields to make it easier to see which PMIC
registers are being set by ACPI code using these.
Note that LDO4 is missing and the mapped registers jump from 0x43
to 0x45 to match. This matches with how the fields are declared
in the DSDT where LDO4 is skipped too. Note there is no hole in
the field addresses, LDO4 is simply just not defined on either side.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The LPAT tables used in the DSDT for some PMICs require special handling,
allow the PMIC OpRegion drivers to provide an alternative implementation
by adding a lpat_raw_to_temp function pointer to struct pmic_table;
and initialize this to the default acpi_lpat_raw_to_temp function
for all PMICs.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The acpi_walk_dep_device_list() function is not as generic as its
name implies, serving only to decrement the dependency count for each
dependent device of the input.
Extend it to accept a callback which can be applied to all the
dependencies in acpi_dep_list.
Replace all existing calls to the function with calls to a wrapper,
passing a callback that applies the same dependency reduction.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> # for platform/surface parts
Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
[ rjw: Changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
On Asus T101HA, we keep receiving those error messages:
i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* mipi_exec_pmic failed, error: -95
intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: Not implemented
intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element: i2c-addr: 0x5e reg-addr 0x4b value 0x59 mask 0xff
Because the opregion is missing the I2C address.
Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
