On Braswell and Broxton (also known as Valleyview and Apollolake), we
need to serialise updates of the GGTT using the big stop_machine()
hammer. This has the side effect of appearing to lockdep as a possible
reclaim (since it uses the cpuhp mutex and that is tainted by per-cpu
allocations). However, we want to use vm->mutex (including ggtt->mutex)
from within the shrinker and so must avoid such possible taints. For this
purpose, we introduced the asynchronous vma binding and we can apply it
to the PIN_GLOBAL so long as take care to add the necessary waits for
the worker afterwards.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/211
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200130181710.2030251-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Now that we have offline error capture and can reset an engine from
inside an atomic context while also preserving the GPU state for
post-mortem analysis, it is time to handle error interrupts thrown by
the command parser.
This provides a much, much faster mechanism for us to detect known
problems than using heartbeats/hangchecks, and also provides a mechanism
for when those are disabled. However, it is limited to problems the HW
can detect in the CS and so not a complete solution for detecting lockups.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200128204318.4182039-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If we encounter a hang on a virtual engine, as we process the hang the
request may already have been moved back to the virtual engine (we are
processing the hang on the physical engine). We need to reclaim the
request from the virtual engine so that the locking is consistent and
local to the real engine on which we will hold the request for error
state capturing.
v2: Pull the reclamation into execlists_hold() and assert that cannot be
called from outside of the reset (i.e. with the tasklet disabled).
v3: Added selftest
v4: Drop the reference owned by the virtual engine
Fixes: 748317386a ("drm/i915/execlists: Offline error capture")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/hang
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Thanks to preempt-to-busy, we leave the request on the HW as we submit
the preemption request. This means that the request may complete at any
moment as we process HW events, and in particular the request may be
retired as we are planning to capture it for a preemption timeout.
Be more careful while obtaining the request to capture after a
preemption timeout, and check to see if it completed before we were able
to put it on the on-hold list. If we do see it did complete just before
we capture the request, proclaim the preemption-timeout a false positive
and pardon the reset as we should hit an arbitration point momentarily
and so be able to process the preemption.
Note that even after we move the request to be on hold it may be retired
(as the reset to stop the HW comes after), so we do require to hold our
own reference as we work on the request for capture (and all of the
peeking at state within the request needs to be carefully protected).
Fixes: 32ff621fd7 ("drm/i915/gt: Allow temporary suspension of inflight requests")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/997
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Currently, we skip error capture upon forced preemption. We apply forced
preemption when there is a higher priority request that should be
running but is being blocked, and we skip inline error capture so that
the preemption request is not further delayed by a user controlled
capture -- extending the denial of service.
However, preemption reset is also used for heartbeats and regular GPU
hangs. By skipping the error capture, we remove the ability to debug GPU
hangs.
In order to capture the error without delaying the preemption request
further, we can do an out-of-line capture by removing the guilty request
from the execution queue and scheduling a worker to dump that request.
When removing a request, we need to remove the entire context and all
descendants from the execution queue, so that they do not jump past.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/738
Fixes: 3a7a92aba8 ("drm/i915/execlists: Force preemption")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In order to support out-of-line error capture, we need to remove the
active request from HW and put it to one side while a worker compresses
and stores all the details associated with that request. (As that
compression may take an arbitrary user-controlled amount of time, we
want to let the engine continue running on other workloads while the
hanging request is dumped.) Not only do we need to remove the active
request, but we also have to remove its context and all requests that
were dependent on it (both in flight, queued and future submission).
Finally once the capture is complete, we need to be able to resubmit the
request and its dependents and allow them to execute.
v2: Replace stack recursion with a simple list.
v3: Check all the parents, not just the first, when searching for a
stuck ancestor!
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/738
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Merge Intel Gen9 graphics fix from Akeem Abodunrin:
"Insufficient control flow in certain data structures for some Intel
Processors with Intel Processor Graphics may allow an unauthenticated
user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access
This provides mitigation for Gen9 hardware. Note that Gen8 is not
impacted due to a previously implemented workaround.
The mitigation involves using an existing hardware feature to forcibly
clear down all EU state at each context switch"
* tag 'Intel-CVE-2019-14615' of emailed bundle from Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com>:
drm/i915/gen9: Clear residual context state on context switch
Intel ID: PSIRT-TA-201910-001
CVEID: CVE-2019-14615
Intel GPU Hardware prior to Gen11 does not clear EU state
during a context switch. This can result in information
leakage between contexts.
For Gen8 and Gen9, hardware provides a mechanism for
fast cleardown of the EU state, by issuing a PIPE_CONTROL
with bit 27 set. We can use this in a context batch buffer
to explicitly cleardown the state on every context switch.
As this workaround is already in place for gen8, we can borrow
the code verbatim for Gen9.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com>
Cc: Kumar Valsan Prathap <prathap.kumar.valsan@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
Cc: Balestrieri Francesco <francesco.balestrieri@intel.com>
Cc: Bloomfield Jon <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Dutt Sudeep <sudeep.dutt@intel.com>
Allocate only an internal intel_context for the kernel_context, forgoing
a global GEM context for internal use as we only require a separate
address space (for our own protection).
Now having weaned GT from requiring ce->gem_context, we can stop
referencing it entirely. This also means we no longer have to create random
and unnecessary GEM contexts for internal use.
GEM contexts are now entirely for tracking GEM clients, and intel_context
the execution environment on the GPU.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191221160324.1073045-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In order to avoid confusing the HW, we must never submit an empty ring
during lite-restore, that is we should always advance the RING_TAIL
before submitting to stay ahead of the RING_HEAD.
Normally this is prevented by keeping a couple of spare NOPs in the
request->wa_tail so that on resubmission we can advance the tail. This
relies on the request only being resubmitted once, which is the normal
condition as it is seen once for ELSP[1] and then later in ELSP[0]. On
preemption, the requests are unwound and the tail reset back to the
normal end point (as we know the request is incomplete and therefore its
RING_HEAD is even earlier).
However, if this w/a should fail we would try and resubmit the request
with the RING_TAIL already set to the location of this request's wa_tail
potentially causing a GPU hang. We can spot when we do try and
incorrectly resubmit without advancing the RING_TAIL and spare any
embarrassment by forcing the context restore.
In the case of preempt-to-busy, we leave the requests running on the HW
while we unwind. As the ring is still live, we cannot rewind our
rq->tail without forcing a reload so leave it set to rq->wa_tail and
only force a reload if we resubmit after a lite-restore. (Normally, the
forced reload will be a part of the preemption event.)
Fixes: 22b7a426bb ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/673
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.vger.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191209023215.3519970-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 82c69bf586)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
In order to avoid confusing the HW, we must never submit an empty ring
during lite-restore, that is we should always advance the RING_TAIL
before submitting to stay ahead of the RING_HEAD.
Normally this is prevented by keeping a couple of spare NOPs in the
request->wa_tail so that on resubmission we can advance the tail. This
relies on the request only being resubmitted once, which is the normal
condition as it is seen once for ELSP[1] and then later in ELSP[0]. On
preemption, the requests are unwound and the tail reset back to the
normal end point (as we know the request is incomplete and therefore its
RING_HEAD is even earlier).
However, if this w/a should fail we would try and resubmit the request
with the RING_TAIL already set to the location of this request's wa_tail
potentially causing a GPU hang. We can spot when we do try and
incorrectly resubmit without advancing the RING_TAIL and spare any
embarrassment by forcing the context restore.
In the case of preempt-to-busy, we leave the requests running on the HW
while we unwind. As the ring is still live, we cannot rewind our
rq->tail without forcing a reload so leave it set to rq->wa_tail and
only force a reload if we resubmit after a lite-restore. (Normally, the
forced reload will be a part of the preemption event.)
Fixes: 22b7a426bb ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/673
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.vger.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191209023215.3519970-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Only along the submission path can we guarantee that the locked request
is indeed from a foreign engine, and so the nesting of engine/rq is
permissible. On the submission tasklet (process_csb()), we may find
ourselves competing with the normal nesting of rq/engine, invalidating
our nesting. As we only use the spinlock for debug purposes, skip the
debug if we cannot acquire the spinlock for safe validation - catching
99% of the bugs is better than causing a hard lockup.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: c95d31c3df ("drm/i915/execlists: Lock the request while validating it during promotion")
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191203152631.3107653-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
