An MLD may send TID-to-Link mapping request frame to negotiate
TID to link mapping with a peer MLD.
Support handling negotiated TID-to-Link mapping request frame
by parsing the frame, asking the driver whether it supports the
received mapping or not, and sending a TID-to-Link mapping response
to the AP MLD.
Theoretically, links that became inactive due to the received TID-to-Link
mapping request, can be selected to be activated but this would require
tearing down the negotiated TID-to-Link mapping, which is still not
supported.
Signed-off-by: Ayala Beker <ayala.beker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240102213313.0bc1a24fcc9d.Ie72e47dc6f8c77d4a2f0947b775ef6367fe0edac@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Johannes Berg says:
====================
Just a couple of more things over the holidays:
- first kunit tests for both cfg80211 and mac80211
- a few multi-link fixes
- DSCP mapping update
- RCU fix
* tag 'wireless-next-2024-01-03' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wireless/wireless-next:
wifi: mac80211: remove redundant ML element check
wifi: cfg80211: parse all ML elements in an ML probe response
wifi: cfg80211: correct comment about MLD ID
wifi: cfg80211: Update the default DSCP-to-UP mapping
wifi: cfg80211: tests: add some scanning related tests
wifi: mac80211: kunit: extend MFP tests
wifi: mac80211: kunit: generalize public action test
wifi: mac80211: add kunit tests for public action handling
kunit: add a convenience allocation wrapper for SKBs
kunit: add parameter generation macro using description from array
wifi: mac80211: fix spelling typo in comment
wifi: cfg80211: fix RCU dereference in __cfg80211_bss_update
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240103144423.52269-3-johannes@sipsolutions.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Kalle Valo says:
====================
wireless-next patches for v6.8
The third "new features" pull request for v6.8. This is a smaller one
to clear up our tree before the break and nothing really noteworthy
this time.
Major changes:
stack
* cfg80211: introduce cfg80211_ssid_eq() for SSID matching
* cfg80211: support P2P operation on DFS channels
* mac80211: allow 64-bit radiotap timestamps
iwlwifi
* AX210: allow concurrent P2P operation on DFS channels
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
It is possible for the TX status report for the (Re)Association Request
frame to be delayed long enough for the AP's (Re)Association Response
frame to be received and processed before it. If that were to happen for
a case where the AP rejects the association with indication to come back
later, the association timeout and retry state should not be modified
anymore with the TX status information that would be processed after
this. Updating the association timeout in such a reverse order of events
could result in shortening the timeouts for the association comeback
mechanism and that could result in the association failing.
Track whether we have already processed association rejection with
comeback time and if so, skip the timeout and retry update on any
following TX status report.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <quic_jouni@quicinc.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20231219174814.2581575-1-j@w1.fi
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
make htmldocs warns:
Documentation/driver-api/80211/cfg80211:48: ./include/net/cfg80211.h:7290: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at cfg80211:7251.
Declaration is '.. c:function:: void cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp (struct net_device *dev, struct cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp *data)'.
This is because there's a function named cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp() and a struct
named cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp, see previous patch for more info.
To workaround this rename the struct to cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp_data. The
parameter for the function is named 'data' anyway so the naming here is
consistent.
Compile tested only.
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <quic_kvalo@quicinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231012114229.2931808-3-kvalo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Resolve several conflicts, mostly between changes/fixes in
wireless and the locking rework in wireless-next. One of
the conflicts actually shows a bug in wireless that we'll
want to fix separately.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Looks like I lost that by accident, add it back.
Fixes: 076fc8775d ("wifi: cfg80211: remove wdev mutex")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We really cannot even get into this as we can't have
a BSS with a 5/10 MHz (scan) width, and therefore all
the code handling shifted rates cannot happen. Remove
it all, since it's broken anyway, at least with MLO.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
The code that sets up the assoc link will currently take the BSS
element data from the beacon only. This is correct for some of
the data, notably the timing and the "have_beacon", but all the
data about MBSSID and EHT really doesn't need to be taken from
there, and if the EHT puncturing is misconfigured on the AP but
we didn't receive a beacon yet, this causes us to connect but
immediately disconnect upon receiving the first beacon, rather
than connecting without EHT in the first place.
Change the code to take MBSSID and EHT data also from the probe
response, for a better picture of what the BSS capabilities are
and to avoid that EHT puncturing problem.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827135854.3c7e52d49482.Iba6b672f6dc74b45bba26bc497e953e27da43ef9@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
When connect to MLO AP with more than one link, and the assoc response of
AP is not success, then cfg80211_unhold_bss() is not called for all the
links' cfg80211_bss except the primary link which means the link used by
the latest successful association request. Thus the hold value of the
cfg80211_bss is not reset to 0 after the assoc fail, and then the
__cfg80211_unlink_bss() will not be called for the cfg80211_bss by
__cfg80211_bss_expire().
Then the AP always looks exist even the AP is shutdown or reconfigured
to another type, then it will lead error while connecting it again.
The detail info are as below.
When connect with muti-links AP, cfg80211_hold_bss() is called by
cfg80211_mlme_assoc() for each cfg80211_bss of all the links. When
assoc response from AP is not success(such as status_code==1), the
ieee80211_link_data of non-primary link(sdata->link[link_id]) is NULL
because ieee80211_assoc_success()->ieee80211_vif_update_links() is
not called for the links.
Then struct cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp resp in cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp() and
struct cfg80211_connect_resp_params cr in __cfg80211_connect_result()
will only have the data of the primary link, and finally function
cfg80211_connect_result_release_bsses() only call cfg80211_unhold_bss()
for the primary link. Then cfg80211_bss of the other links will never free
because its hold is always > 0 now.
Hence assign value for the bss and status from assoc_data since it is
valid for this case. Also assign value of addr from assoc_data when the
link is NULL because the addrs of assoc_data and link both represent the
local link addr and they are same value for success connection.
Fixes: 81151ce462 ("wifi: mac80211: support MLO authentication/association with one link")
Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <quic_wgong@quicinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230825070055.28164-1-quic_wgong@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Since we're now protecting everything with the wiphy mutex
(and were really using it for almost everything before),
there's no longer any real reason to have a separate wdev
mutex. It may feel better, but really has no value.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the iflist_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more in mac80211. However, drivers may also iterate,
and in some cases (e.g. mt76) do so from high-priority
contexts. Thus, keep the mutex around but remove its
usage in mac80211 apart from those driver-visible parts
that are still needed.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch,
with the parts that are still needed as described above
reverted manually.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the local->mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the chanctx_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We now hold the wiphy mutex everywhere that we use or
needed the sta_mtx, so we don't need this mutex any
more. Remove it.
Most of this change was done automatically with spatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Along with everything else, move the dynamic PS work
to be a wiphy work, to simplify locking later.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Again this serves to simplify the locking in mac80211
in the future, since this is a relatively complex work.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Move the DFS CAC work over to hold the wiphy lock
there without worry about work cancellation.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
The current SMPS status handling isn't per link, so we only
ever change the deflink, which is obviously wrong, it's not
even used for multi-link connections, but the request API
actually includes the link ID.
Use the new status_data changes to move the handling to the
right link, this also saves parsing the frame again on the
status report, instead we can now check only if it was an
SMPS frame.
Of course, move the worker to be a wiphy work so that we're
able to cancel it safely for the link.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
