[ Upstream commit baf8d6899b ]
The PWM pins on North Bridge on Armada 37xx can be configured into PWM
or GPIO functions. When in PWM function, each pin can also be configured
to drive low on 0 and tri-state on 1 (LED mode).
The current definitions handle this by declaring two pin groups for each
pin:
- group "pwmN" with functions "pwm" and "gpio"
- group "ledN_od" ("od" for open drain) with functions "led" and "gpio"
This is semantically incorrect. The correct definition for each pin
should be one group with three functions: "pwm", "led" and "gpio".
Change the "pwmN" groups to support "led" function.
Remove "ledN_od" groups. This cannot break backwards compatibility with
older device trees: no device tree uses it since there is no PWM driver
for this SOC yet. Also "ledN_od" groups are not even documented.
Fixes: b835d69530 ("pinctrl: armada-37xx: swap polarity on LED group")
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210719112938.27594-1-kabel@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 798a315fc3 ]
Some pin doesn't support PUPD register, if it fails and fallbacks with
bias_set_combo case, it will call mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pupd_r1_r0() to
modify the PUPD pin again.
Since the general bias set are either PU/PD or PULLSEL/PULLEN, try
bias_set or bias_set_rev1 for the other fallback case. If the pin
doesn't support neither PU/PD nor PULLSEL/PULLEN, it will return
-ENOTSUPP.
Fixes: 81bd1579b4 ("pinctrl: mediatek: Fix fallback call path")
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210701080955.2660294-1-hsinyi@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 897120d41e ]
Checking value of MCP_INTF in mcp23s08_irq suggests that the handler may be
called even when there is no interrupt pending.
But the actual interrupt could happened between reading MCP_INTF and MCP_GPIO.
In this situation we got nothing from MCP_INTF, but the event gets acknowledged
on the expander by reading MCP_GPIO. This leads to losing events.
Fix the problem by not reading any register until we see something in MCP_INTF.
The error was reproduced and fix tested on MCP23017.
Signed-off-by: Radim Pavlik <radim.pavlik@tbs-biometrics.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/AM7PR06MB6769E1183F68DEBB252F665ABA3E9@AM7PR06MB6769.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 67e2996f72 ]
Each GPIO bank supports a variable number of lines which is usually 16, but
is less in some cases : this is specified by the last argument of the
"gpio-ranges" bank node property.
Report to the framework, the actual number of lines, so the libgpiod
gpioinfo command lists the actually existing GPIO lines.
Fixes: 1dc9d28915 ("pinctrl: stm32: add possibility to use gpio-ranges to declare bank range")
Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@foss.st.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210617144629.2557693-1-fabien.dessenne@foss.st.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fa0c10a5f3 ]
The Special Function Registers on all Exynos SoC, including ARM64, are
32-bit wide, so entire driver uses matching functions like readl() or
writel(). On 64-bit ARM using unsigned long for register masks:
1. makes little sense as immediately after bitwise operation it will be
cast to 32-bit value when calling writel(),
2. is actually error-prone because it might promote other operands to
64-bit.
Addresses-Coverity: Unintentional integer overflow
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210408195029.69974-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit bd85125ea8 ]
A System Error (SError, followed by kernel panic) was detected when
trying to print the supported pins in a pinctrl device which supports
multiple pins per register. This change fixes the pcs_pin_dbg_show() in
pinctrl-single driver when bits_per_mux is not zero. In addition move
offset calculation and pin offset in register to common function.
Fixes: 4e7e8017a8 ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins of different modules")
Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Reviewed-by: Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319152133.28705-4-hhhawa@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 196d941753 ]
When updating pin names for Intel Lewisburg, the numbers of pins were
left behind. Update them accordingly.
Fixes: e66ff71fd0 ("pinctrl: lewisburg: Update pin list according to v1.1v6")
Signed-off-by: Yuanyuan Zhong <yzhong@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit cf9d052aa6 upstream.
In Linux, if a driver does disable_irq() and later does enable_irq()
on its interrupt, I believe it's expecting these properties:
* If an interrupt was pending when the driver disabled then it will
still be pending after the driver re-enables.
* If an edge-triggered interrupt comes in while an interrupt is
disabled it should assert when the interrupt is re-enabled.
If you think that the above sounds a lot like the disable_irq() and
enable_irq() are supposed to be masking/unmasking the interrupt
instead of disabling/enabling it then you've made an astute
observation. Specifically when talking about interrupts, "mask"
usually means to stop posting interrupts but keep tracking them and
"disable" means to fully shut off interrupt detection. It's
unfortunate that this is so confusing, but presumably this is all the
way it is for historical reasons.
Perhaps more confusing than the above is that, even though clients of
IRQs themselves don't have a way to request mask/unmask
vs. disable/enable calls, IRQ chips themselves can implement both.
...and yet more confusing is that if an IRQ chip implements
disable/enable then they will be called when a client driver calls
disable_irq() / enable_irq().
It does feel like some of the above could be cleared up. However,
without any other core interrupt changes it should be clear that when
an IRQ chip gets a request to "disable" an IRQ that it has to treat it
like a mask of that IRQ.
In any case, after that long interlude you can see that the "unmask
and clear" can break things. Maulik tried to fix it so that we no
longer did "unmask and clear" in commit 71266d9d39 ("pinctrl: qcom:
Move clearing pending IRQ to .irq_request_resources callback"), but it
only handled the PDC case and it had problems (it caused
sc7180-trogdor devices to fail to suspend). Let's fix.
>From my understanding the source of the phantom interrupt in the
were these two things:
1. One that could have been introduced in msm_gpio_irq_set_type()
(only for the non-PDC case).
2. Edges could have been detected when a GPIO was muxed away.
Fixing case #1 is easy. We can just add a clear in
msm_gpio_irq_set_type().
Fixing case #2 is harder. Let's use a concrete example. In
sc7180-trogdor.dtsi we configure the uart3 to have two pinctrl states,
sleep and default, and mux between the two during runtime PM and
system suspend (see geni_se_resources_{on,off}() for more
details). The difference between the sleep and default state is that
the RX pin is muxed to a GPIO during sleep and muxed to the UART
otherwise.
As per Qualcomm, when we mux the pin over to the UART function the PDC
(or the non-PDC interrupt detection logic) is still watching it /
latching edges. These edges don't cause interrupts because the
current code masks the interrupt unless we're entering suspend.
However, as soon as we enter suspend we unmask the interrupt and it's
counted as a wakeup.
Let's deal with the problem like this:
* When we mux away, we'll mask our interrupt. This isn't necessary in
the above case since the client already masked us, but it's a good
idea in general.
* When we mux back will clear any interrupts and unmask.
Fixes: 4b7618fdc7 ("pinctrl: qcom: Add irq_enable callback for msm gpio")
Fixes: 71266d9d39 ("pinctrl: qcom: Move clearing pending IRQ to .irq_request_resources callback")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210114191601.v7.4.I7cf3019783720feb57b958c95c2b684940264cd1@changeid
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 4079d35fa4 upstream.
When the Qualcomm pinctrl driver wants to Ack an interrupt, it does a
read-modify-write on the interrupt status register. On some SoCs it
makes sure that the status bit is 1 to "Ack" and on others it makes
sure that the bit is 0 to "Ack". Presumably the first type of
interrupt controller is a "write 1 to clear" type register and the
second just let you directly set the interrupt status register.
As far as I can tell from scanning structure definitions, the
interrupt status bit is always in a register by itself. Thus with
both types of interrupt controllers it is safe to "Ack" interrupts
without doing a read-modify-write. We can do a simple write.
It should be noted that if the interrupt status bit _was_ ever in a
register with other things (like maybe status bits for other GPIOs):
a) For "write 1 clear" type controllers then read-modify-write would
be totally wrong because we'd accidentally end up clearing
interrupts we weren't looking at.
b) For "direct set" type controllers then read-modify-write would also
be wrong because someone setting one of the other bits in the
register might accidentally clear (or set) our interrupt.
I say this simply to show that the current read-modify-write doesn't
provide any sort of "future proofing" of the code. In fact (for
"write 1 clear" controllers) the new code is slightly more "future
proof" since it would allow more than one interrupt status bits to
share a register.
NOTE: this code fixes no bugs--it simply avoids an extra register
read.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210114191601.v7.2.I3635de080604e1feda770591c5563bd6e63dd39d@changeid
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 9a85c09a3f upstream.
- JZ4760 and JZ4760B have a similar register layout as the JZ4740, and
don't use the new register layout, which was introduced with the
JZ4770 SoC and not the JZ4760 or JZ4760B SoCs.
- The JZ4740 code path only expected two function modes to be
configurable for each pin, and wouldn't work with more than two. Fix
it for the JZ4760, which has four configurable function modes.
Fixes: 0257595a5c ("pinctrl: Ingenic: Add pinctrl driver for JZ4760 and JZ4760B.")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.3
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201211232810.261565-1-paul@crapouillou.net
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit 6726fbff19 ("pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPI only function problem.")
fixes access to GPIO banks T and U on the AST2600. Both banks contain
input-only pins and the GPIO pin function is named GPITx and GPIUx
respectively. Unfortunately the fix had a negative impact on GPIO banks
D and E for the AST2400 and AST2500 where the GPIO pass-through
functions take similar "GPI"-style names. The net effect on the older
SoCs was that when the GPIO subsystem requested a pin in banks D or E be
muxed for GPIO, they were instead muxed for pass-through mode.
Mistakenly muxing pass-through mode e.g. breaks booting the host on
IBM's Witherspoon (AC922) platform where GPIOE0 is used for FSI.
Further exploit the names in the provided expression structure to
differentiate pass-through from pin-specific GPIO modes.
This follow-up fix gives the expected behaviour for the following tests:
Witherspoon BMC (AST2500):
1. Power-on the Witherspoon host
2. Request GPIOD1 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
3. Request GPIOE1 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
4. Request the balls for GPIOs E2 and E3 be muxed as GPIO pass-through
("GPIE2" mode) via a pinctrl hog in the devicetree
Rainier BMC (AST2600):
5. Request GPIT0 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
6. Request GPIU0 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
Together the tests demonstrate that all three pieces of functionality
(general GPIOs via 1, 2 and 3, input-only GPIOs via 5 and 6, pass-through
mode via 4) operate as desired across old and new SoCs.
Fixes: 9b92f5c51e ("pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPI only function problem.")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Tested-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Cc: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com>
Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126063337.489927-1-andrew@aj.id.au
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
intel-pinctrl for v5.10-3
* Fix HOSTSW_OWN offset and unhide SPI group of pins on Jasper Lake
* Fix debounce configuration on Baytrail when it's turned off
* Fix default bias setting on Merrifield
The following is an automated git shortlog grouped by driver:
baytrail:
- Avoid clearing debounce value when turning it off
jasperlake:
- Fix HOSTSW_OWN offset
- Unhide SPI group of pins
merrifield:
- Set default bias in case no particular value given
Baytrail pin control has a common register to set up debounce timeout.
When a pin configuration requested debounce to be disabled, the rest
of the pins may still want to have debounce enabled and thus rely on
the common timeout value. Avoid clearing debounce value when turning
it off for one pin while others may still use it.
Fixes: 658b476c74 ("pinctrl: baytrail: Add debounce configuration")
Depends-on: 04ff5a095d ("pinctrl: baytrail: Rectify debounce support")
Depends-on: 827e1579e1 ("pinctrl: baytrail: Rectify debounce support (part 2)")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
When GPIO library asks pin control to set the bias, it doesn't pass
any value of it and argument is considered boolean (and this is true
for ACPI GpioIo() / GpioInt() resources, by the way). Thus, individual
drivers must behave well, when they got the resistance value of 1 Ohm,
i.e. transforming it to sane default.
In case of Intel Merrifield pin control hardware the 20 kOhm sounds plausible
because it gives a good trade off between weakness and minimization of leakage
current (will be only 50 uA with the above choice).
Fixes: 4e80c8f505 ("pinctrl: intel: Add Intel Merrifield pin controller support")
Depends-on: 2956b5d94a ("pinctrl / gpio: Introduce .set_config() callback for GPIO chips")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
GPIOs that attempt to use interrupts get thwarted with a message like:
"pin 161 cannot be used as IRQ" (for instance with SD_CD). This is because
the HOSTSW_OWN offset is incorrect, so every GPIO looks like it's
owned by ACPI.
Fixes: e278dcb704 ("pinctrl: intel: Add Intel Jasper Lake pin controller support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
If the group of pins is hidden in the pin list it affects
the register offset calculation despite fixed GPIO base.
Hence, the offsets of all pins after the hidden group
are broken. Instead we have to unhide the group and use a flag
to exclude it from GPIO number space.
Fixes: e278dcb704 ("pinctrl: intel: Add Intel Jasper Lake pin controller support")
Reported-by: Divagar Mohandass <divagar.mohandass@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
intel-pinctrl for v5.10-2
* Respect bias setting when comes from ACPI
The following is an automated git shortlog grouped by driver:
intel:
- Set default bias in case no particular value given
- Fix 2 kOhm bias which is 833 Ohm
When GPIOs that are routed to PDC are used as output they can still latch
the IRQ pending at GIC. As a result the spurious IRQ was handled when the
client driver change the direction to input to starts using it as IRQ.
Currently such erroneous latched IRQ are cleared with .irq_enable callback
however if the driver continue to use GPIO as interrupt and invokes
disable_irq() followed by enable_irq() then everytime during enable_irq()
previously latched interrupt gets cleared.
This can make edge IRQs not seen after enable_irq() if they had arrived
after the driver has invoked disable_irq() and were pending at GIC.
Move clearing erroneous IRQ to .irq_request_resources callback as this is
the place where GPIO direction is changed as input and its locked as IRQ.
While at this add a missing check to invoke msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask()
from .irq_enable callback only when GPIO is not routed to PDC.
Fixes: e35a6ae0eb ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1604561884-10166-1-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
