no_llseek had been defined to NULL two years ago, in commit 868941b144
("fs: remove no_llseek")
To quote that commit,
At -rc1 we'll need do a mechanical removal of no_llseek -
git grep -l -w no_llseek | grep -v porting.rst | while read i; do
sed -i '/\<no_llseek\>/d' $i
done
would do it.
Unfortunately, that hadn't been done. Linus, could you do that now, so
that we could finally put that thing to rest? All instances are of the
form
.llseek = no_llseek,
so it's obviously safe.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When trying to watch a component array extension, and the array isn't the
first extended element, it fails as the type comparison is always done on
the 1st element. Fix it by indexing the 'ext' array.
Example on a dummy struct counter_comp:
static struct counter_comp dummy[] = {
COUNTER_COMP_DIRECTION(..),
...,
COUNTER_COMP_ARRAY_CAPTURE(...),
};
static struct counter_count dummy_cnt = {
...
.ext = dummy,
.num_ext = ARRAY_SIZE(dummy),
}
Currently, counter_get_ext() returns -EINVAL when trying to add a watch
event on one of the capture array element in such example.
Fixes: d2011be1e2 ("counter: Introduce the COUNTER_COMP_ARRAY component type")
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230829134029.2402868-2-fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com
Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>
The COUNTER_COMP_ARRAY Counter component type is introduced to enable
support for Counter array components. With Counter array components,
exposure for buffers on counter devices can be defined via new Counter
array component macros. This should simplify code for driver authors who
would otherwise need to define individual Counter components for each
array element.
Eight Counter array component macros are introduced::
DEFINE_COUNTER_ARRAY_U64(_name, _length)
DEFINE_COUNTER_ARRAY_CAPTURE(_name, _length)
DEFINE_COUNTER_ARRAY_POLARITY(_name, _enums, _length)
COUNTER_COMP_DEVICE_ARRAY_U64(_name, _read, _write, _array)
COUNTER_COMP_COUNT_ARRAY_U64(_name, _read, _write, _array)
COUNTER_COMP_SIGNAL_ARRAY_U64(_name, _read, _write, _array)
COUNTER_COMP_ARRAY_CAPTURE(_read, _write, _array)
COUNTER_COMP_ARRAY_POLARITY(_read, _write, _array)
Eight Counter array callbacks are introduced as well::
int (*signal_array_u32_read)(struct counter_device *counter,
struct counter_signal *signal,
size_t idx, u32 *val);
int (*signal_array_u32_write)(struct counter_device *counter,
struct counter_signal *signal,
size_t idx, u32 val);
int (*device_array_u64_read)(struct counter_device *counter,
size_t idx, u64 *val);
int (*count_array_u64_read)(struct counter_device *counter,
struct counter_count *count,
size_t idx, u64 *val);
int (*signal_array_u64_read)(struct counter_device *counter,
struct counter_signal *signal,
size_t idx, u64 *val);
int (*device_array_u64_write)(struct counter_device *counter,
size_t idx, u64 val);
int (*count_array_u64_write)(struct counter_device *counter,
struct counter_count *count,
size_t idx, u64 val);
int (*signal_array_u64_write)(struct counter_device *counter,
struct counter_signal *signal,
size_t idx, u64 val);
Driver authors can handle reads/writes for an array component by
receiving an element index via the `idx` parameter and processing the
respective value via the `val` parameter.
For example, suppose a driver wants to expose a Count's read-only
capture buffer of four elements using a callback
`foobar_capture_read()`::
DEFINE_COUNTER_ARRAY_CAPTURE(foobar_capture_array, 4);
COUNTER_COMP_ARRAY_CAPTURE(foobar_capture_read, NULL,
foobar_capture_array)
Respective sysfs attributes for each array element would appear for the
respective Count:
* /sys/bus/counter/devices/counterX/countY/capture0
* /sys/bus/counter/devices/counterX/countY/capture1
* /sys/bus/counter/devices/counterX/countY/capture2
* /sys/bus/counter/devices/counterX/countY/capture3
If a user tries to read _capture2_ for example, `idx` will be `2` when
passed to the `foobar_capture_read()` callback, and thus the driver
knows which array element to handle.
Counter arrays for polarity elements can be defined in a similar
manner as u64 elements::
const enum counter_signal_polarity foobar_polarity_states[] = {
COUNTER_SIGNAL_POLARITY_POSITIVE,
COUNTER_SIGNAL_POLARITY_NEGATIVE,
};
DEFINE_COUNTER_ARRAY_POLARITY(foobar_polarity_array,
foobar_polarity_states, 4);
COUNTER_COMP_ARRAY_POLARITY(foobar_polarity_read,
foobar_polarity_write,
foobar_polarity_array)
Tested-by: Julien Panis <jpanis@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5310c22520aeae65b1b74952419f49ac4c8e1ec1.1664204990.git.william.gray@linaro.org/
Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a51fd608704bdfc5a0efa503fc5481df34241e0a.1664318353.git.william.gray@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
A race condition is possible when writing to events_queue_size where the
events kfifo is freed during the execution of a kfifo_in(), resulting in
a use-after-free. This patch prevents such a scenario by protecting the
events queue in operation with a spinlock and locking before performing
the events queue size adjustment.
The existing events_lock mutex is renamed to events_out_lock to reflect
that it only protects events queue out operations. Because the events
queue in operations can occur in an interrupt context, a new
events_in_lock spinlock is introduced and utilized.
Fixes: feff17a550 ("counter: Implement events_queue_size sysfs attribute")
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211021103540.955639-1-vilhelm.gray@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>