Now that INTEL_PCH_TYPE() and HAS_PCH_*() macros are under display, and
accept a struct intel_display pointer, use that instead of struct
drm_i915_private pointer in display code.
This is done naively by running:
$ sed -i 's/\(INTEL_PCH_TYPE\|HAS_PCH_[A-Z0-9_-]*\)([^)]*)/\1(display)/g' \
$(find drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display -name "*.c")
and fixing the fallout, i.e. removing unused local i915 variables and
adding display variables where needed.
v2: Rebase
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/999f4d7b8ed11739b1c5ec8d6408fc39d5e3776b.1744880985.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
No one really cares how we store the shared_dplls. Currently
it happens to be an array, but we could change that to a more
flexible scheme at some point. Hide the implementation details
behind an iterator macro.
The slight downside is the pll variable moving out of the
loop scope, but maybe someday soon we'll start to convert
everything over to having declarations within for-statements...
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231003200620.11633-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
There's no good reason to keep around this PLL index == PLL ID
footgun. Get rid of it.
Both i915->shared_dplls[] and state->shared_dpll[] are indexed
by the same thing now, which is just the index we get at
initialization from dpll_mgr->dpll_info[]. The rest is all about
PLL IDs now.
v2: Add pll->index to mimic drm_crtc & co.
Remove the comment saying ID should match the index
v3: s/i/pll->index/ in debugfs loop (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231003200620.11633-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Turns out many of the files that need i915_reg.h get it implicitly via
{display/intel_de.h, gt/intel_context.h} -> i915_trace.h -> i915_irq.h
-> i915_reg.h. Since i915_trace.h doesn't actually need i915_irq.h,
makes sense to drop it, but that requires adding quite a few new
includes all over the place.
Prefer including i915_reg.h where needed instead of adding another
implicit include, because eventually we'll want to split up i915_reg.h
and only include the specific registers at each place.
Also some places actually needed i915_irq.h too.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e78a2e0ac1bffaf5af3b5ccc21dff05e6518cef.1668008071.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
