SPI-NAND changes:
A load of fixes to Winbond manufacturer driver have been done, plus a
structure constification.
Raw NAND changes:
The GPMI driver has been improved on the power management side.
The Davinci driver has been cleaned up.
A leak in the Atmel driver plus some typos in the core have been fixed.
After commit 0edb555a65 ("platform: Make platform_driver::remove()
return void") .remove() is (again) the right callback to implement for
platform drivers.
Convert all platform drivers below drivers/mtd to use .remove(), with
the eventual goal to drop struct platform_driver::remove_new(). As
.remove() and .remove_new() have the same prototypes, conversion is done
by just changing the structure member name in the driver initializer.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20241007205803.444994-10-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com
The NAND core complies with the ONFI specification, which itself
mentions that after any program or erase operation, a status check
should be performed to see whether the operation was finished *and*
successful.
The NAND core offers helpers to finish a page write (sending the
"PAGE PROG" command, waiting for the NAND chip to be ready again, and
checking the operation status). But in some cases, advanced controller
drivers might want to optimize this and craft their own page write
helper to leverage additional hardware capabilities, thus not always
using the core facilities.
Some drivers, like this one, do not use the core helper to finish a page
write because the final cycles are automatically managed by the
hardware. In this case, the additional care must be taken to manually
perform the final status check.
Let's read the NAND chip status at the end of the page write helper and
return -EIO upon error.
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 08d8c62164 ("mtd: rawnand: pl353: Add support for the ARM PL353 SMC NAND controller")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20230717194221.229778-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it was merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20230714174751.4060439-1-robh@kernel.org
