Some device names were wrong because our internal data suggested
that discrete Ga devices have B-step RF, when they actually have
C-step. However, matching the step for them is bad anyway.
Change the code to be able to find the devinfo depending on the
device being integrated or discrete. This is only for the names,
since the RF config cannot be different for the same RF because
it's discrete or integrated, so add a kunit test that ensures
both (a) the RF config is the same and (b) the name is different
(the latter really only because that's the whole point of having
a match on the discrete/integrated bit.)
Remove the RF step matching since it's no longer needed now.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250709081300.e048a94659f1.Ie5919c70e9d8e3a28152aaf3cdffd19ed3d4f5c7@changeid
We don't need the CORES() match nor jacket (which really doesn't
even make sense to match to the RF anyway), and since the subdevice
masks we care about are contiguous, we can encode them as highest
and lowest bit set (automatically.) By encoding whether to match or
not as separate flags and taking advantage of the limited range of
the RF type, step and ID we can reduce the amount of memory needed
for the table, while also making the logic (apart perhaps from the
subdevice mask) easier to understand.
This reduces the size of the module by about 1.5KiB on x86-64.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250511195137.38a805a7c96f.Ieece00476cea6054b0827cd075eb8ba5943373df@changeid
For now, the WH and PE radios require the same config as
FM, so just add a #define for those instead of copying
the data. Since this is true, Sc/Dr/Br all used the same
configs for all RF types, but that's confusing, so now
use the defined WH/PE names for the correct combinations.
We can also now enable the unit test that ensures we have
no duplicate RF configs.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250509104454.2582160-8-miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
For different MACs we maintain the configs in different
files, and while it's a small waste of space, this is a
worthwhile trade-off for maintenance and simplicity. So
allow different MAC types to have the same config. This
could allow the same config for two MACs in the same MAC
family, but that's not hugely important. Also simplify
the test to not build a config list, there's no good
reason to do that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250504132447.27f5d570eb32.I1649309a0e54a1d446a38c5b2124a582de9f6d61@changeid
The BW limit, cores and RF ID are matched in the subdevice ID,
so it doesn't really make sense to have both SUBDEV() match and
a match on any of those three. In particular, for Killer devices
the subdevice ID doesn't even follow the layout, so no matching
should be on those three values at all, only with SUBDEV().
Change the logic around the BW limit to have it more like all
the other things: only a bw_limit match in the dev_info, and
put the actual bandwidth into struct iwl_cfg. This duplicates a
number of those values, but that way the logic is clearer.
Add a test that checks that the three matches mentioned above
are not used in conjunction with SUBDEV(), and check that if
the bw_limit is matched, a BW limit is provided in the config.
Also check that the "Killer" devices have a SUBDEV() match.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250502155404.a185eac2736c.I87ee87300c92518a1d3296d3eda9fd4163e9085e@changeid
We'll have devices that are EHT capable but don't support 320 MHz and
those devices look like the 320 MHz capable devices, but have distinct
subsystem ID.
We already had the same type of differentiation for HE devices that
support 160 MHz or not.
Enhance that mechanism and now the _IWL_DEV_INFO macro gets an
indication whether the bandwidth should be limited for that specific
device.
The subsystem ID gives a binary answer about the bandwidth limitation
and iwl_pci_find_dev_info() compares this to the list of _IWL_DEV_INFO
entries.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250205145347.1ba406c538a5.I6e24123f60a764aedfeaaac8768c26e136c320cf@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
