This reverts commit b35f7a773c.
A new version of the series was submitted, so it's easier to revert the
old one and add the new one due to the changes invovled.
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
tty/vt currently uses memdup_user() and vmemdup_array_user() to copy
userspace arrays.
Whereas there is no danger of overflowing, the call to vmemdup_user()
currently utilizes array_size() to calculate the array size
nevertheless. This is not useful because array_size() would return
SIZE_MAX and pass it to vmemdup_user() in case of (the impossible)
overflow.
string.h from the core-API now provides the wrappers memdup_array_user()
and vmemdup_array_user() to copy userspace arrays in a standardized
manner. Additionally, they also perform generic overflow-checks.
Use these wrappers to make it more obvious and readable that arrays are
being copied.
As we are at it, remove two unnecessary empty lines.
Suggested-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103111207.74621-2-pstanner@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090537.15557-4-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
con_do_clear_unimap() currently decreases and increases refcount of old
dictionary in a back and forth fashion. This makes the code really hard
to follow. Decrease the refcount only if everything went well and we
really allocated a new one and decoupled from the old dictionary.
I sincerelly hope I did not make a mistake in this (ill) logic.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-33-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-30-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-29-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-28-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-27-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-26-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-25-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-24-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-23-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-22-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-21-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-20-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The code currently does shift, OR, and AND logic directly in the code.
It is not much obvious what happens there. Therefore define four macros
for that purpose and use them in the code. We use GENMASK() so that it
is clear which bits serve what purpose:
- UNI_GLYPH: bits 0.. 5
- UNI_ROW: bits 6..10
- UNI_DIR: bits 11..31
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-10-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The constant 20 makes the font sum computation signed which can lead to
sign extensions and signed wraps. It's not much of a problem as we build
with -fno-strict-overflow. But if we ever decide not to, be ready, so
switch the constant to unsigned.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210105120239.28031-7-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
