Implement dot11ExtendedRegInfoSupport to advertise non-AP station
regulatory power capability as part of regulatory connectivity
element in (Re)Association request frames so that AP can achieve
maximum client connectivity. Control field which was interpreted
using value of 3-bits B5 to B3, now uses value of 4-bits B6 to B3 to
interpret the type of AP. Hence update IEEE80211_HE_6GHZ_OPER_CTRL_REG_INFO
to parse 4-bits control field. If older AP still updates only 3-bits
value of control field, station can still interpret the value as per
section E.2.7 of IEEE 802.11 REVme D7.0 and support the appropriate
AP type.
Also update IEEE80211_6GHZ_CTRL_REG_INDOOR_SP_AP as the value of
standard power AP is changed to 8 instead of 4 so that AP can support both
LPI AP and SP AP to maximize the connectivity with stations. For backward
compatibility, keeping value 4 as old AP by limiting it to SP AP only.
Signed-off-by: Somashekhar Puttagangaiah <somashekhar.puttagangaiah@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250609213232.90cdef116aad.I85da390fbee59355e3855691933e6a5e55c47ac4@changeid
[fix kernel-doc]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
S1G beacons are not traditional beacons but a type of extension frame.
Extension frames contain the frame control and duration fields, followed
by zero or more optional fields before the frame body. These optional
fields are distinct from the variable length elements.
The presence of optional fields is indicated in the frame control field.
To correctly locate the elements offset, the frame control must be parsed
to identify which optional fields are present. Currently, mac80211 parses
S1G beacons based on fixed assumptions about the frame layout, without
inspecting the frame control field. This can result in incorrect offsets
to the "variable" portion of the frame.
Properly parse S1G beacon frames by using the field lengths defined in
IEEE 802.11-2024, section 9.3.4.3, ensuring that the elements offset is
calculated accurately.
Fixes: 9eaffe5078 ("cfg80211: convert S1G beacon to scan results")
Fixes: cd418ba63f ("mac80211: convert S1G beacon to scan results")
Signed-off-by: Lachlan Hodges <lachlan.hodges@morsemicro.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250603053538.468562-1-lachlan.hodges@morsemicro.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Currently during the multi-link element defragmentation process, the
multi-link element length added to the total IEs length when calculating
the length of remaining IEs after the multi-link element in
cfg80211_defrag_mle(). This could lead to out-of-bounds access if the
multi-link element or its corresponding fragment elements are the last
elements in the IEs buffer.
To address this issue, correctly calculate the remaining IEs length by
deducting the multi-link element end offset from total IEs end offset.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 2481b5da9c ("wifi: cfg80211: handle BSS data contained in ML probe responses")
Signed-off-by: Veerendranath Jakkam <quic_vjakkam@quicinc.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250424-fix_mle_defragmentation_oob_access-v1-1-84412a1743fa@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Commit b35108a51c ("jiffies: Define secs_to_jiffies()") introduced
secs_to_jiffies(). As the value here is a multiple of 1000, use
secs_to_jiffies() instead of msecs_to_jiffies to avoid the multiplication.
This is converted using scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci with
the following Coccinelle rules:
@depends on patch@
expression E;
@@
-msecs_to_jiffies(E * 1000)
+secs_to_jiffies(E)
-msecs_to_jiffies(E * MSEC_PER_SEC)
+secs_to_jiffies(E)
Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250219203240.141272-1-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
In 'cfg80211_scan_6ghz()', an instances of 'struct cfg80211_colocated_ap'
are allocated as if they would have 'ssid' as trailing VLA member. Since
this is not so, extra IEEE80211_MAX_SSID_LEN bytes are not needed.
Briefly tested with KUnit.
Fixes: c8cb5b854b ("nl80211/cfg80211: support 6 GHz scanning")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250113155417.552587-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
According to Draft P802.11be_D7.0 clause 35.3.4.2, if a multi-link
request requests an MLD with which an AP corresponding to the
nontransmitted BSSID, the corresponding multi-link probe response
shall carry a basic multi-mink element of that MLD in the frame body
of the multi-link probe response, whose location is outside of the
Multiple BSSID element carried in the frame.
Therefore additional handing is needed for parsing multi-link probe
response and generating the merged elements so that the MLD in the frame
body can be correctly copied to the generated elements. Otherwise, the
nontransmitted BSS looks like non-MLD.
Signed-off-by: Money Wang <money.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael-CY Lee <michael-cy.lee@mediatek.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241225073725.847062-1-michael-cy.lee@mediatek.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This allows users to prevent a vif from affecting radios other than the
configured ones. This can be useful in cases where e.g. an AP is running
on one radio, and triggering a scan on another radio should not disturb it.
Changing the allowed radios list for a vif is supported, but only while
it is down.
While it is possible to achieve the same by always explicitly specifying
a frequency list for scan requests and ensuring that the wrong channel/band
is never accidentally set on an unrelated interface, this change makes
multi-radio wiphy setups a lot easier to deal with for CLI users.
By itself, this patch only enforces the radio mask for scanning requests
and remain-on-channel. Follow-up changes build on this to limit configured
frequencies.
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/eefcb218780f71a1549875d149f1196486762756.1728462320.git-series.nbd@nbd.name
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Currently, in cfg80211_parse_ml_elem_sta_data(), when RNR element
indicates a BSS that operates in a channel that current regulatory
domain doesn't support, a NULL value is returned by
ieee80211_get_channel_khz() and assigned to this BSS entry's channel
field. Later in cfg80211_inform_single_bss_data(), the reported
BSS entry's channel will be wrongly overridden by transmitted BSS's.
This could result in connection failure that when wpa_supplicant
tries to select this reported BSS entry while it actually resides in
an unsupported channel.
Since this channel is not supported, it is reasonable to skip such
entries instead of reporting wrong information.
Signed-off-by: Chenming Huang <quic_chenhuan@quicinc.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240923021644.12885-1-quic_chenhuan@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Looking at https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1a3986bbd3169c307819
and running reproducer with CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS, I've noticed the
following:
[ T4985] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in net/wireless/scan.c:3479:25
[ T4985] index 164 is out of range for type 'struct ieee80211_channel *[]'
<...skipped...>
[ T4985] Call Trace:
[ T4985] <TASK>
[ T4985] dump_stack_lvl+0x1c2/0x2a0
[ T4985] ? __pfx_dump_stack_lvl+0x10/0x10
[ T4985] ? __pfx__printk+0x10/0x10
[ T4985] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x127/0x150
[ T4985] cfg80211_wext_siwscan+0x11a4/0x1260
<...the rest is not too useful...>
Even if we do 'creq->n_channels = n_channels' before 'creq->ssids =
(void *)&creq->channels[n_channels]', UBSAN treats the latter as
off-by-one error. Fix this by using pointer arithmetic rather than
an expression with explicit array indexing and use convenient
'struct_size()' to simplify the math here and in 'kzalloc()' above.
Fixes: 5ba63533bb ("cfg80211: fix alignment problem in scan request")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240905150400.126386-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru
[fix coding style for multi-line calculation]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Jiazi Li reported that they occasionally see hash table duplicates
as evidenced by the WARN_ON() in rb_insert_bss() in this code. It
isn't clear how that happens, nor have I been able to reproduce it,
but if it does happen, the kernel crashes later, when it tries to
unhash the entry that's now not hashed.
Try to make this situation more survivable by removing the BSS from
the list(s) as well, that way it's fully leaked here (as had been
the intent in the hash insert error path), and no longer reachable
through the list(s) so it shouldn't be unhashed again later.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026013528.GA24122@Jiazi.Li
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240607181726.36835-2-johannes@sipsolutions.net
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
In nl80211, we always set the ssids of a scan request to
NULL when n_ssids==0 (passive scan). Drivers have relied
on this behaviour in the past, so we fixed it in 6 GHz
scan requests as well, and added a warning so we'd have
assurance the API would always be called that way.
syzbot found that wext doesn't ensure that, so we reach
the check and trigger the warning. Fix the wext code to
set the ssids pointer to NULL when there are none.
Reported-by: syzbot+cd6135193ba6bb9ad158@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: f7a8b10bfd ("wifi: cfg80211: fix 6 GHz scan request building")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
The 6 GHz scan request struct allocated by cfg80211_scan_6ghz() is
meant to be formed this way:
[base struct][channels][ssids][6ghz_params]
It is allocated with [channels] as the maximum number of channels
supported by the driver in the 6 GHz band, since allocation is
before knowing how many there will be.
However, the inner pointers are set incorrectly: initially, the
6 GHz scan parameters pointer is set:
[base struct][channels]
^ scan_6ghz_params
and later the SSID pointer is set to the end of the actually
_used_ channels.
[base struct][channels]
^ ssids
If many APs were to be discovered, and many channels used, and
there were many SSIDs, then the SSIDs could overlap the 6 GHz
parameters.
Additionally, the request->ssids for most of the function points
to the original request still (given the struct copy) but is used
normally, which is confusing.
Clear this up, by actually using the allocated space for 6 GHz
parameters _after_ the SSIDs, and set up the SSIDs initially so
they are used more clearly. Just like in nl80211.c, set them
only if there actually are SSIDs though.
Finally, also copy the elements (ie/ie_len) so they're part of
the same request, not pointing to the old request.
Co-developed-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240510113738.4190692ef4ee.I0cb19188be17a8abd029805e3373c0a7777c214c@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
If a non-TX BSS is included in a per-STA profile, then we cannot set
transmitted_bss for it. Even worse, if we do things properly we should
be configuring both bssid_index and max_bssid_indicator correctly. We do
not actually have both pieces of information (and, some APs currently
do not include either).
So, ignore any per-STA profile where the RNR says that the BSS is not
transmitted. Also fix transmitted_bss to never be set for per-STA
profiles.
This fixes issues where mac80211 was setting the reference BSSID to an
incorrect value.
Fixes: 2481b5da9c ("wifi: cfg80211: handle BSS data contained in ML probe responses")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240318184907.6a0babed655a.Iad447fea417c63f683da793556b97c31d07a4aab@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
If we just want to determine the length of the fragmented
data, we basically need the same logic, and really we want
it to be _literally_ the same logic, so it cannot be out
of sync in any way.
Allow calling cfg80211_defragment_element() without an output
buffer, where it then just returns the required output size.
Also add this to the tests, just to exercise it, using the
pre-calculated length to really do the defragmentation, which
checks that this is sufficient.
Reviewed-by: Miriam Rachel Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240228095718.6d6565b9e3f2.Ib441903f4b8644ba04b1c766f90580ee6f54fc66@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This function pretty much does what cfg80211_inform_single_bss_data()
already does, except on a frame data. But we can call the other one,
after populating the inform_data more completely, so we don't need to
do everything twice.
This also uncovered a few bugs:
* the 6 GHz power type checks were only done in this function, move
(and rename from 'uhb') those;
* the chains/chain_signal information wasn't used in the latter,
add that
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240216135047.f3f864f94c78.I2192adb32ab10713e71f395a9d203386264f6ed5@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
There are some changes coming to wireless-next that will
otherwise cause conflicts, pull wireless in first to be
able to resolve that when applying the individual changes
rather than having to do merge resolution later.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We recently added some validation that we don't try to
connect to an AP that is currently in a channel switch
process, since that might want the channel to be quiet
or we might not be able to connect in time to hear the
switching in a beacon. This was in commit c09c4f3199
("wifi: mac80211: don't connect to an AP while it's in
a CSA process").
However, we promptly got a report that this caused new
connection failures, and it turns out that the AP that
we now cannot connect to is permanently advertising an
extended channel switch announcement, even with quiet.
The AP in question was an Asus RT-AC53, with firmware
3.0.0.4.380_10760-g21a5898.
As a first step, attempt to detect that we're dealing
with such a situation, so mac80211 can use this later.
Reported-by: coldolt <andypalmadi@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/CAJvGw+DQhBk_mHXeu6RTOds5iramMW2FbMB01VbKRA4YbHHDTA@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: c09c4f3199 ("wifi: mac80211: don't connect to an AP while it's in a CSA process")
Reviewed-by: Miriam Rachel Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240129131413.246972c8775e.Ibf834d7f52f9951a353b6872383da710a7358338@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
If the reporting AP is part of the same MLD, then an entry in the RNR is
required in order to discover it again from the BSS generated from the
per-STA profile in the Multi-Link Probe Response.
We need this because we do not have a direct concept of an MLD AP and
just do the lookup from one to the other on the fly if needed. As such,
we need to ensure that this lookup will work both ways.
Fixes: 2481b5da9c ("wifi: cfg80211: handle BSS data contained in ML probe responses")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240102213313.4cb3dbb1d84f.I7c74edec83c5d7598cdd578929fd0876d67aef7f@changeid
[roll in off-by-one fix and test updates from Benjamin]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
