The core part of the selftest, i.e., the je <-> jmp cycle, mimics the
original sched-ext bpf program. The test will fail without the
previous patch.
I tried to create some cases for other potential cycles
(je <-> je, jmp <-> je and jmp <-> jmp) with similar pattern
to the test in this patch, but failed. So this patch
only contains one test for je <-> jmp cycle.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904221256.37389-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
A program calling sub-program which does a tail call.
The idea is to verify instructions generated by jit for tail calls:
- in program and sub-program prologues;
- for subprogram call instruction;
- for tail call itself.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240820102357.3372779-9-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a bunch of positive selftests which extensively cover the various
contexts and parameters in which the new VFS based BPF kfuncs may be
used from.
Again, the following VFS based BPF kfuncs are thoroughly tested within
this new selftest:
* struct file *bpf_get_task_exe_file(struct task_struct *);
* void bpf_put_file(struct file *);
* int bpf_path_d_path(struct path *, char *, size_t);
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240731110833.1834742-4-mattbobrowski@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a bunch of negative selftests responsible for asserting that the
BPF verifier successfully rejects a BPF program load when the
underlying BPF program misuses one of the newly introduced VFS based
BPF kfuncs.
The following VFS based BPF kfuncs are extensively tested within this
new selftest:
* struct file *bpf_get_task_exe_file(struct task_struct *);
* void bpf_put_file(struct file *);
* int bpf_path_d_path(struct path *, char *, size_t);
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240731110833.1834742-3-mattbobrowski@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Tests for no_caller_saved_registers processing logic
(see verifier.c:match_and_mark_nocsr_pattern()):
- a canary positive test case;
- a canary test case for arm64 and riscv64;
- various tests with broken patterns;
- tests with read/write fixed/varying stack access that violate nocsr
stack access contract;
- tests with multiple subprograms;
- tests using nocsr in combination with may_goto/bpf_loop,
as all of these features affect stack depth;
- tests for nocsr stack spills below max stack depth.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240722233844.1406874-11-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR.
Conflicts:
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
1e7962114c ("bnxt_en: Restore PTP tx_avail count in case of skb_pad() error")
165f87691a ("bnxt_en: add timestamping statistics support")
No adjacent changes.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2024-06-06
We've added 54 non-merge commits during the last 10 day(s) which contain
a total of 50 files changed, 1887 insertions(+), 527 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add a user space notification mechanism via epoll when a struct_ops
object is getting detached/unregistered, from Kui-Feng Lee.
2) Big batch of BPF selftest refactoring for sockmap and BPF congctl
tests, from Geliang Tang.
3) Add BTF field (type and string fields, right now) iterator support
to libbpf instead of using existing callback-based approaches,
from Andrii Nakryiko.
4) Extend BPF selftests for the latter with a new btf_field_iter
selftest, from Alan Maguire.
5) Add new kfuncs for a generic, open-coded bits iterator,
from Yafang Shao.
6) Fix BPF selftests' kallsyms_find() helper under kernels configured
with CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN, from Yonghong Song.
7) Remove a bunch of unused structs in BPF selftests,
from David Alan Gilbert.
8) Convert test_sockmap section names into names understood by libbpf
so it can deduce program type and attach type, from Jakub Sitnicki.
9) Extend libbpf with the ability to configure log verbosity
via LIBBPF_LOG_LEVEL environment variable, from Mykyta Yatsenko.
10) Fix BPF selftests with regards to bpf_cookie and find_vma flakiness
in nested VMs, from Song Liu.
11) Extend riscv32/64 JITs to introduce shift/add helpers to generate Zba
optimization, from Xiao Wang.
12) Enable BPF programs to declare arrays and struct fields with kptr,
bpf_rb_root, and bpf_list_head, from Kui-Feng Lee.
* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (54 commits)
selftests/bpf: Drop useless arguments of do_test in bpf_tcp_ca
selftests/bpf: Use start_test in test_dctcp in bpf_tcp_ca
selftests/bpf: Use start_test in test_dctcp_fallback in bpf_tcp_ca
selftests/bpf: Add start_test helper in bpf_tcp_ca
selftests/bpf: Use connect_to_fd_opts in do_test in bpf_tcp_ca
libbpf: Auto-attach struct_ops BPF maps in BPF skeleton
selftests/bpf: Add btf_field_iter selftests
selftests/bpf: Fix send_signal test with nested CONFIG_PARAVIRT
libbpf: Remove callback-based type/string BTF field visitor helpers
bpftool: Use BTF field iterator in btfgen
libbpf: Make use of BTF field iterator in BTF handling code
libbpf: Make use of BTF field iterator in BPF linker code
libbpf: Add BTF field iterator
selftests/bpf: Ignore .llvm.<hash> suffix in kallsyms_find()
selftests/bpf: Fix bpf_cookie and find_vma in nested VM
selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_list_head arrays.
selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_rb_root arrays and fields in nested struct types.
selftests/bpf: Test kptr arrays and kptrs in nested struct fields.
bpf: limit the number of levels of a nested struct type.
bpf: look into the types of the fields of a struct type recursively.
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240606223146.23020-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Add test cases for the bits iter:
- Positive cases
- Bit mask representing a single word (8-byte unit)
- Bit mask representing data spanning more than one word
- The index of the set bit
- Nagative cases
- bpf_iter_bits_destroy() is required after calling
bpf_iter_bits_new()
- bpf_iter_bits_destroy() can only destroy an initialized iter
- bpf_iter_bits_next() must use an initialized iter
- Bit mask representing zero words
- Bit mask representing fewer words than expected
- Case for ENOMEM
- Case for NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240517023034.48138-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com
This set of tests check that the BPF verifier rejects programs with
invalid return codes (recvmsg4 and recvmsg6 hooks can only return 1).
This patch replaces the tests in test_sock_addr.c with
verifier_sock_addr.c, a new verifier prog_tests for sockaddr hooks, in a
step towards fully retiring test_sock_addr.c.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240510190246.3247730-2-jrife@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add unit tests for bpf_arena_alloc/free_pages() functionality
and bpf_arena_common.h with a set of common helpers and macros that
is used in this test and the following patches.
Also modify test_loader that didn't support running bpf_prog_type_syscall
programs.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240308010812.89848-13-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Add a test validating that freplace'ing another main (entry) BPF program
fails if the target BPF program doesn't have valid/expected func proto BTF.
We extend fexit_bpf2bpf test to allow to specify expected log message
for negative test cases (where freplace program is expected to fail to
load).
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-11-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a few test that validate BPF verifier's lazy approach to validating
global subprogs.
We check that global subprogs that are called transitively through
another global subprog is validated.
We also check that invalid global subprog is not validated, if it's not
called from the main program.
And we also check that main program is always validated first, before
any of the subprogs.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231124035937.403208-4-andrii@kernel.org
A set of test cases to check behavior of callback handling logic,
check if verifier catches the following situations:
- program not safe on second callback iteration;
- program not safe on zero callback iterations;
- infinite loop inside a callback.
Verify that callback logic works for bpf_loop, bpf_for_each_map_elem,
bpf_user_ringbuf_drain, bpf_find_vma.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-8-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
As seen from previous commit that fix backtracking for BPF_ALU | BPF_TO_BE
| BPF_END, both BPF_NEG and BPF_END require special handling. Add tests
written with inline assembly to check that the verifier does not incorrecly
use the src_reg field of BPF_NEG and BPF_END (including bswap added in v4).
Suggested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102053913.12004-4-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add unit tests for new ldsx insns. The test includes sign-extension
with a single value or with a value range.
If cpuv4 is not supported due to
(1) older compiler, e.g., less than clang version 18, or
(2) test runner test_progs and test_progs-no_alu32 which tests
cpu v2 and v3, or
(3) non-x86_64 arch not supporting new insns in jit yet,
a dummy program is added with below output:
#318/1 verifier_ldsx/cpuv4 is not supported by compiler or jit, use a dummy test:OK
#318 verifier_ldsx:OK
to indicate the test passed with a dummy test instead of actually
testing cpuv4. I am using a dummy prog to avoid changing the
verifier testing infrastructure. Once clang 18 is widely available
and other architectures support cpuv4, at least for CI run,
the dummy program can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728011304.3719139-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Check __mark_chain_precision() log to verify that scalars with same
IDs are marked as precise. Use several scenarios to test that
precision marks are propagated through:
- registers of scalar type with the same ID within one state;
- registers of scalar type with the same ID cross several states;
- registers of scalar type with the same ID cross several stack frames;
- stack slot of scalar type with the same ID;
- multiple scalar IDs are tracked independently.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230613153824.3324830-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Add a bunch of tests validating verifier's precision backpropagation
logic in the presence of subprog calls and/or callback-calling
helpers/kfuncs.
We validate the following conditions:
- subprog_result_precise: static subprog r0 result precision handling;
- global_subprog_result_precise: global subprog r0 precision
shortcutting, similar to BPF helper handling;
- callback_result_precise: similarly r0 marking precise for
callback-calling helpers;
- parent_callee_saved_reg_precise, parent_callee_saved_reg_precise_global:
propagation of precision for callee-saved registers bypassing
static/global subprogs;
- parent_callee_saved_reg_precise_with_callback: same as above, but in
the presence of callback-calling helper;
- parent_stack_slot_precise, parent_stack_slot_precise_global:
similar to above, but instead propagating precision of stack slot
(spilled SCALAR reg);
- parent_stack_slot_precise_with_callback: same as above, but in the
presence of callback-calling helper;
- subprog_arg_precise: propagation of precision of static subprog's
input argument back to caller;
- subprog_spill_into_parent_stack_slot_precise: negative test
validating that verifier currently can't support backtracking of stack
access with non-r10 register, we validate that we fallback to
forcing precision for all SCALARs.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230505043317.3629845-10-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Test verifier/value_ptr_arith automatically converted to use inline assembly.
Test cases "sanitation: alu with different scalars 2" and
"sanitation: alu with different scalars 3" are updated to
avoid -ENOENT as return value, as __retval() annotation
only supports numeric literals.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230421174234.2391278-25-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Test verifier/unpriv semi-automatically converted to use inline assembly.
The verifier/unpriv.c had to be split in two parts:
- the bulk of the tests is in the progs/verifier_unpriv.c;
- the single test that needs `struct bpf_perf_event_data`
definition is in the progs/verifier_unpriv_perf.c.
The tests above can't be in a single file because:
- first requires inclusion of the filter.h header
(to get access to BPF_ST_MEM macro, inline assembler does
not support this isntruction);
- the second requires vmlinux.h, which contains definitions
conflicting with filter.h.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230421174234.2391278-23-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Test verifier/loops1 automatically converted to use inline assembly.
There are a few modifications for the converted tests.
"tracepoint" programs do not support test execution, change program
type to "xdp" (which supports test execution) for the following tests
that have __retval tags:
- bounded loop, count to 4
- bonded loop containing forward jump
Also, remove the __retval tag for test:
- bounded loop, count from positive unknown to 4
As it's return value is a random number.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230421174234.2391278-10-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
