This list started as a "when to prefer `expect`" list, but at some point
during writing I changed it to a "prefer `expect` unless..." one. However,
the first bullet remained, which does not make sense anymore.
Thus remove it. In addition, fix nearby typo.
Fixes: 04866494e9 ("Documentation: rust: discuss `#[expect(...)]` in the guidelines")
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241117133127.473937-1-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Discuss `#[expect(...)]` in the Lints sections of the coding guidelines
document, which is an upcoming feature in Rust 1.81.0, and explain that
it is generally to be preferred over `allow` unless there is a reason
not to use it (e.g. conditional compilation being involved).
Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-19-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
In the C side, disabling diagnostics locally, i.e. within the source code,
is rare (at least in the kernel). Sometimes warnings are manipulated
via the flags at the translation unit level, but that is about it.
In Rust, it is easier to change locally the "level" of lints
(e.g. allowing them locally). In turn, this means it is easier to
globally enable more lints that may trigger a few false positives here
and there that need to be allowed locally, but that generally can spot
issues or bugs.
Thus document this.
Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Tested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904204347.168520-17-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
