This patch reverses the DPM clocks levels output of pp_dpm_mclk
and pp_dpm_fclk for renoir.
On dGPUs and older APUs we expose the levels from lowest clocks
to highest clocks. But for some APUs, the clocks levels are
given the reversed orders by PMFW. Like the memory DPM clocks
that are exposed by pp_dpm_mclk.
It's not intuitive that they are reversed on these APUs. All tools
and software that talks to the driver then has to know different ways
to interpret the data depending on the asic.
So we need to reverse them to expose the clocks levels from the
driver consistently.
Signed-off-by: Tim Huang <Tim.Huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This patch reverses the DPM clocks levels output of pp_dpm_mclk
and pp_dpm_fclk.
On dGPUs and older APUs we expose the levels from lowest clocks
to highest clocks. But for some APUs, the clocks levels that from
the DFPstateTable are given the reversed orders by PMFW. Like the
memory DPM clocks that are exposed by pp_dpm_mclk.
It's not intuitive that they are reversed on these APUs. All tools
and software that talks to the driver then has to know different ways
to interpret the data depending on the asic.
So we need to reverse them to expose the clocks levels from the
driver consistently.
Signed-off-by: Tim Huang <Tim.Huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This patch reverses the DPM clocks levels output of pp_dpm_mclk
and pp_dpm_fclk.
On dGPUs and older APUs we expose the levels from lowest clocks
to highest clocks. But for some APUs, the clocks levels that from
the DFPstateTable are given the reversed orders by PMFW. Like the
memory DPM clocks that are exposed by pp_dpm_mclk.
It's not intuitive that they are reversed on these APUs. All tools
and software that talks to the driver then has to know different ways
to interpret the data depending on the asic.
So we need to reverse them to expose the clocks levels from the
driver consistently.
Signed-off-by: Tim Huang <Tim.Huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This patch reverses the DPM clocks levels output of pp_dpm_mclk.
On dGPUs and older APUs we expose the levels from lowest clocks
to highest clocks. But for some APUs, the clocks levels that from
the DFPstateTable are given the reversed orders by PMFW. Like the
memory DPM clocks that are exposed by pp_dpm_mclk.
It's not intuitive that they are reversed on these APUs. All tools
and software that talks to the driver then has to know different ways
to interpret the data depending on the asic.
So we need to reverse them to expose the clocks levels from the
driver consistently.
Signed-off-by: Tim Huang <Tim.Huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This patch reverses the DPM clocks levels output of pp_dpm_mclk
and pp_dpm_fclk.
On dGPUs and older APUs we expose the levels from lowest clocks
to highest clocks. But for some APUs, the clocks levels that from
the DFPstateTable are given the reversed orders by PMFW. Like the
memory DPM clocks that are exposed by pp_dpm_mclk.
It's not intuitive that they are reversed on these APUs. All tools
and software that talks to the driver then has to know different ways
to interpret the data depending on the asic.
So we need to reverse them to expose the clocks levels from the
driver consistently.
Signed-off-by: Tim Huang <Tim.Huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Printing the other clock types should not be conditioned on being able
to print OD_SCLK. Some GPUs currently have limited capability of only
printing a subset of these.
Since this condition was introduced in v5.18-rc1, reading from
`pp_od_clk_voltage` has been returning empty on the Asus ROG Strix G15
(2021).
Fixes: 79c65f3fcb ("drm/amd/pm: do not expose power implementation details to amdgpu_pm.c")
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonatas Esteves <jntesteves@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
PMFW may boots the ASIC with a different power mode from the system's
real one. Notify PMFW explicitly the power mode the system in. This
is needed only when ACDC switch via gpio is not supported.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Prevent further dpm casting on legacy asics without od_enabled in
amdgpu_dpm_is_overdrive_supported. This can avoid UBSAN complain
in init sequence.
v2: add a macro to check legacy dpm instead of checking asic family/type
v3: refine macro name for naming consistency
Suggested-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
v1: To support multple XCD case (Le)
v2: unify naming style (Le)
v3: apply the changes to gc v11_0 (Hawking)
v4: apply the changes to gc SOC21 (Morris)
Signed-off-by: Le Ma <le.ma@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Morris Zhang <Shiwu.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
gcc with W=1 reports
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0.c:36:
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v13_0.h:66:18: error:
‘pmfw_decoded_link_width’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
66 | static const int pmfw_decoded_link_width[7] = {0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16};
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v13_0.h:65:18: error:
‘pmfw_decoded_link_speed’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
65 | static const int pmfw_decoded_link_speed[5] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
These variables are defined and used in smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c and smu_v13_0_0_ppt.c.
There should be only one definition. So define the variables as globals
in smu_v13_0.c
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
clang with W=1 reports
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c:1700:6: error: variable
'num_of_active_display' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int num_of_active_display = 0;
^
This variable is not used so remove it.
Fixes: 75145aab7a ("drm/amdgpu/swsmu: clean up a bunch of stale interfaces")
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The comment mentions that power1 cap attributes are not supported on
Vangogh, but the opposite is indeed valid: for APUs, only Vangogh is
supported. While at it, also fixed the Renoir comment below (thanks
Melissa for noticing that!).
Cc: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Cc: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is used to fix following compilation issue with legacy gcc
error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
Signed-off-by: bobzhou <bob.zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Always setup overdrive tables after resume. Preserve only some
user-defined settings in user_overdrive_table if they're set.
Copy restored user_overdrive_table into od_table to get correct
values.
On cold boot, BTC was triggered and GfxVfCurve was calibrated. We
got VfCurve settings (a). On resuming back, BTC will be triggered
again and GfxVfCurve will be recalibrated. VfCurve settings (b)
got may be different from those of cold boot. So if we reuse
those VfCurve settings (a) got on cold boot on suspend, we can
run into discrepencies.
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1897
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2276
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Błażej Szczygieł <mumei6102@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Initial version of PMFW interface and message
headers for SMU 13.0.6 support.
v2: squash in location fixes (Alex)
v3: squash in updates (Alex)
Signed-off-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
If some invalid workload types exposed by the power profile sysfs node,
it will be failed to set the unsuported profiles.
So we can skip to show the invalid workload type in the profiles list to
avoid that failure happen.
Acked-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Capped and Uncapped workload types are supported, each workload type
has different performance thresholds and pstate conditions.
* capped mode is used by power centric workload
* uncapped mode is used by perf centric workload
Acked-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Capped and uncapped workload types switching are supported on Vangogh,
User can switch the power profile and check current type with below commands.
1) switch to capped mode:
`# echo 8 > /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_power_profile_mode`
2) switch to uncapped mode:
`# echo 9 > /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_power_profile_mode`
3) check current mode:
$ cat /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pp_power_profile_mode
1 3D_FULL_SCREEN
3 VIDEO
4 VR
5 COMPUTE
6 CUSTOM
8 CAPPED
9 UNCAPPED*
Acked-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The less than zero comparison of unsigned variable "value" is never
true. Remove dead code.
Fixes: c3ed0e72c8 ("drm/amdgpu: added a sysfs interface for thermal throttling")
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
added a sysfs interface for thermal throttling, then userspace
can get/update thermal limit
Signed-off-by: Kun Liu <Kun.Liu2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
SMU IF version mismatch as a warning message exists widely
after asic production, however, due to this log level setting,
such mismatch warning will be caught by automation test like
IGT and reported as a fake error after checking. As such mismatch
does not break anything, to reduce confusion, downgrade it from
dev_warn to dev_info.
Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
It is assumed the pptable used before runpm is same as
the one used afterwards. Thus, we can reuse the stored
copy and do not need to resetup the pptable again.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Feifei Xu <feifei.xu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
When building on OpenBSD/arm64 with clang 15, unaligned access
warnings are seen when a union is embedded inside a packed struct.
drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/vega20_pptable.h:136:17: error: field
smcPPTable within 'struct _ATOM_VEGA20_POWERPLAYTABLE' is less aligned
than 'PPTable_t' and is usually due to
'struct _ATOM_VEGA20_POWERPLAYTABLE' being packed, which can lead to
unaligned accesses [-Werror,-Wunaligned-access]
PPTable_t smcPPTable;
^
Make PPTable_t packed to avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
