Now that INTEL_PCH_TYPE() and HAS_PCH_*() macros are under display, and
accept a struct intel_display pointer, use that instead of struct
drm_i915_private pointer in display code.
This is done naively by running:
$ sed -i 's/\(INTEL_PCH_TYPE\|HAS_PCH_[A-Z0-9_-]*\)([^)]*)/\1(display)/g' \
$(find drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display -name "*.c")
and fixing the fallout, i.e. removing unused local i915 variables and
adding display variables where needed.
v2: Rebase
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/999f4d7b8ed11739b1c5ec8d6408fc39d5e3776b.1744880985.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Pull the whole BDW IPS min CDCLK stuff into the IPS code
so that all the details around IPS are contained in once
place.
Note that while
- min_cdclk = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_cdclk * 100, 95);
vs.
+ min_cdclk = max(DIV_ROUND_UP(crtc_state->pixel_rate * 100, 95), min_cdclk)
may look different, they are in fact the same because
min_cdclk==crtc_state->pixel_rate at this point in
intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk() on BDW.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029215217.3697-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Use x100, or ver * 100 + rel, versions for full IP version checks,
similar to what xe driver does:
- Replace IP_VER(14, 1) inline with 1401, etc.
- Convert DISPLAY_VER_FULL() to DISPLAY_VERx100()
- Convert IS_DISPLAY_VER_FULL() to IS_DISPLAY_VERx100()
- Convert IS_DISPLAY_VER_STEP() to IS_DISPLAY_VERx100_STEP()
This makes ver.rel versions easier to use, follows the xe driver
pattern, and drops the dependency on the IP_VER() macro.
v2: Rebase, drop IP_VER() from xe compat headers
v3: Rebase
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029155536.753413-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Use a forward declaration for struct cec_notifier instead of including
media/cec-notifier.h in intel_display_types.h, and only include it where
needed.
Also realize that a lot of places depend on including linux/debugfs.h
via intel_display_types.h -> media/cec-notifier.h -> media/cec.h, and
include that too where needed.
v2: hsw_ips.c also needs debugfs.h (kernel test robot)
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240827104521.4151471-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
The current cdclk/mbus programming sequence is as follows:
1. intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update()
2. update_mbus_pre_enable()
3. intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update()
when the actual mdclk/cdclk programming is postponed to
intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update() we must keep using
the old mdclk/cdclk ratio during update_mbus_pre_enable().
This guarantees the programmed ratio matches the rest of
the hardware state (mdlk/cdclk/mbus joining).
v2: Extracted from the vblank synchronized mbus programming patch
Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> #v1
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240402155016.13733-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Currently we only consider the relationship of the
old and new CDCLK frequencies when determining whether
to do the repgramming from intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update()
or intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update().
It is technically possible to have a situation where the
CDCLK frequency is decreasing, but the voltage_level is
increasing due a DDI port. In this case we should bump
the voltage level already in intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update()
(so that the voltage_level will have been increased by the
time the port gets enabled), while leaving the CDCLK frequency
unchanged (as active planes/etc. may still depend on it).
We can then reduce the CDCLK frequency to its final value
from intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update().
In order to handle that correctly we shall construct a
suitable amalgam of the old and new cdclk states in
intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update().
And we can simply call intel_set_cdclk() unconditionally
in both places as it will not do anything if nothing actually
changes vs. the current hw state.
v2: Handle cdclk_state->disable_pipes
v3: Only synchronize the cd2x update against the pipe's vblank
when the cdclk frequency is changing during the current
commit phase (Gustavo)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240402155016.13733-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Currently we always reprogram CDCLK from the
intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update() when using squash/crawl.
The code only works correctly for the cd2x update or full
modeset cases, and it was simply never updated to deal with
squash/crawl.
If the CDCLK frequency is increasing we must reprogram it
before we do anything else that might depend on the new
higher frequency, and conversely we must not decrease
the frequency until everything that might still depend
on the old higher frequency has been dealt with.
Since cdclk_state->pipe is only relevant when doing a cd2x
update we can't use it to determine the correct sequence
during squash/crawl. To that end introduce cdclk_state->disable_pipes
which simply indicates that we must perform the update
while the pipes are disable (ie. during
intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update()). Otherwise we use the
same old vs. new CDCLK frequency comparsiong as for cd2x
updates.
The only remaining problem case is when the voltage_level
needs to increase due to a DDI port, but the CDCLK frequency
is decreasing (and not all pipes are being disabled). The
current approach will not bump the voltage level up until
after the port has already been enabled, which is too late.
But we'll take care of that case separately.
v2: Don't break the "must disable pipes case"
v3: Keep the on stack 'pipe' for future use
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: d62686ba3b ("drm/i915/adl_p: CDCLK crawl support for ADL")
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240402155016.13733-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Commit 394b4b7df9 ("drm/i915/lnl: Add CDCLK table") and commit
3d3696c0fe ("drm/i915/lnl: Start using CDCLK through PLL") started
adding support for CDCLK programming support for Xe2LPD. One final piece
is missing, which is the programming necessary for changed in the ratio
between MDCLK and CDCLK. Let's do that now.
BSpec instructs us to update MBUS_CTL and DBUF_CTL_S* registers when the
ratio between MDCLK and CDCLK changes. The updates must be done before
changing the CDCLK when decreasing the frequency; or after it when
increasing the frequency.
Ratio-related updates to MBUS_CTL also depend on the state of MBus
joining, so they are performed by either CDCLK change sequence or by
changes in MBus joining. Since one might happen independently of the
other, we need to make sure that both logics see the necessary state
values when programming that register. MBus joining logic needs to know
the MDCLK:CDCLK ratio and that's already provided via mdclk_cdclk_ratio
field of struct intel_dbuf_state.
For the CDCLK logic, we need to have something similar: we need to
propagate the status of MBus joining to struct intel_cdclk_state. Do
that by adding the field joined_mbus to struct intel_cdclk_config.
(Preferably, that field would be added to intel_cdclk_state, however
currently only intel_cdclk_config is passed down to the functions that
do the register programming. We might revisit this decision if we find
that refactoring the code to pass the whole intel_cdclk_state is worth
it.)
Bspec: 68864, 68868, 69090, 69482
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240312163639.172321-7-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Xe2LPD always selects the CDCLK PLL as source for the MDCLK. Because of
that, the ratio between MDCLK and CDCLK is not be constant anymore. As
such, make sure to have the current ratio available in intel_dbuf_state
so that it can be used during dbuf programming.
Note that we write-lock the global state instead of serializing to a
hardware commit because a change in the ratio should be rather handled
in the CDCLK change sequence, which will need to take care of updating
the necessary registers in that case. We will implement that in upcoming
changes.
That said, changes in the MBus joining state should be handled by the
DBUF/MBUS logic, just like it is already done, but the logic will need
to know the ratio to properly update the registers.
v2:
- Make first sentence of commit message more intelligible. (Matt)
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240312163639.172321-6-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Currently, only Xe2LPD uses CDCLK PLL as the source of MDCLK and
previous display IPs use the CD2XCLK. There will be changes in code
paths common to those platforms that will rely on which source is being
used. As such, let's make that information explicit with the addition of
the predicate function mdclk_source_is_cdclk_pll().
Arguably, an enum could be created, but using a boolean should suffice
here, since we there are only two possible sources and the logic that
will rely on it will be very localized.
In order to get the code into a more consistent state, let's also take
this opportunity to hook the selection of CDCLK_CTL's "MDCLK Source
Select" to that new function. Even though currently only
MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL will be returned, having this extra logic is
arguably better than keeping stuff untied and prone to bugs.
v2:
- Extract mdclk_source_is_cdclk_pll() out of xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel()
to make latter only about the register's field.
Bspec: 69090, 68861
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240312163639.172321-3-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
