With -Wmissing-prototypes the compiler will warn about non-static
functions which don't have a prototype defined.
This warning doesn't make much sense for nolibc itself but for user code
it is still useful.
To pacify the compiler add prototypes next to the function definitions,
similar to how it is handled elsewhere in the kernel.
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250123-nolibc-prototype-v1-1-e1afc5c1999a@weissschuh.net
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
After the nolibc includes were split to facilitate portability from
standard libcs, programs that include only what they need may miss
some symbols which are needed by libgcc. This is the case for raise()
which is needed by the divide by zero code in some architectures for
example.
Regardless, being able to include only the apparently needed files is
convenient.
Instead of trying to move all exported definitions to a single file,
since this can change over time, this patch takes another approach
consisting in including the nolibc header at the end of all standard
include files. This way their types and functions are already known
at the moment of inclusion, and including any single one of them is
sufficient to bring all the required ones.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This function is normally found in signal.h, and providing the file
eases porting of existing programs. Let's move it there.
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
