Add more test cases for LPM trie in test_maps:
1) test_lpm_trie_update_flags
It constructs various use cases for BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST and check
whether the return value of update operation is expected.
2) test_lpm_trie_update_full_maps
It tests the update operations on a full LPM trie map. Adding new node
will fail and overwriting the value of existed node will succeed.
3) test_lpm_trie_iterate_strs and test_lpm_trie_iterate_ints
There two test cases test whether the iteration through get_next_key is
sorted and expected. These two test cases delete the minimal key after
each iteration and check whether next iteration returns the second
minimal key. The only difference between these two test cases is the
former one saves strings in the LPM trie and the latter saves integers.
Without the fix of get_next_key, these two cases will fail as shown
below:
test_lpm_trie_iterate_strs(1091):FAIL:iterate #2 got abc exp abS
test_lpm_trie_iterate_ints(1142):FAIL:iterate #1 got 0x2 exp 0x1
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241206110622.1161752-10-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
CONFIG_PREEMPT is a preemtion model the so called "Low-Latency Desktop".
A different preemption model is PREEMPT_RT the so called "Real-Time".
Both implement preemption in kernel and set CONFIG_PREEMPTION.
There is also the so called "LAZY PREEMPT" which the "Scheduler
controlled preemption model". Here we have also preemption in the kernel
the rules are slightly different.
Therefore the testsuite should not check for CONFIG_PREEMPT (as one
model) but for CONFIG_PREEMPTION to figure out if preemption in the
kernel is possible.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119161819.qvEcs-n_@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cross-merge bpf fixes after downstream PR.
In particular to bring the fix in
commit aa30eb3260 ("bpf: Force checkpoint when jmp history is too long").
The follow up verifier work depends on it.
And the fix in
commit 6801cf7890 ("selftests/bpf: Use -4095 as the bad address for bits iterator").
It's fixing instability of BPF CI on s390 arch.
No conflicts.
Adjacent changes in:
Auto-merging arch/Kconfig
Auto-merging kernel/bpf/helpers.c
Auto-merging kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
Auto-merging kernel/bpf/verifier.c
Auto-merging mm/slab_common.c
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cast 'rlim_t' argument to match expected type of printf() format and avoid
compile errors seen building for mips64el/musl-libc:
In file included from map_tests/sk_storage_map.c:20:
map_tests/sk_storage_map.c: In function 'test_sk_storage_map_stress_free':
map_tests/sk_storage_map.c:414:56: error: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'rlim_t' {aka 'long long unsigned int'} [-Werror=format=]
414 | CHECK(err, "setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE)", "rlim_new:%lu errno:%d",
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
415 | rlim_new.rlim_cur, errno);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| rlim_t {aka long long unsigned int}
./test_maps.h:12:24: note: in definition of macro 'CHECK'
12 | printf(format); \
| ^~~~~~
map_tests/sk_storage_map.c:414:68: note: format string is defined here
414 | CHECK(err, "setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE)", "rlim_new:%lu errno:%d",
| ~~^
| |
| long unsigned int
| %llu
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Fixes: 51a0e301a5 ("bpf: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE test to test_maps")
Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1e00a1fa7acf91b4ca135c4102dc796d518bad86.1721713597.git.tony.ambardar@gmail.com
Add a new map test, map_percpu_stats.c, which is checking the correctness of
map's percpu elements counters. For supported maps the test upserts a number
of elements, checks the correctness of the counters, then deletes all the
elements and checks again that the counters sum drops down to zero.
The following map types are tested:
* BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC
* BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC
* BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH,
* BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH,
* BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH
* BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH
* BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH, BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU
* BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH, BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU
* BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS
Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230706133932.45883-6-aspsk@isovalent.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Update sk_storage_map_test to make sure kernel does not copy user
non-zero value spin lock to kernel, and does not copy kernel spin
lock value to user.
If user spin lock value is copied to kernel, this test case will
make kernel spin on the copied lock, resulting in rcu stall and
softlockup.
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114134720.1057939-3-xukuohai@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add test result message when test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup()
succeeds or is skipped. The test case can be skipped due to the choose
of preemption model in kernel config, so export skips in test_maps.c and
increase it when needed.
The following is the output of test_maps when the test case succeeds or
is skipped:
test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup:PASS
test_maps: OK, 0 SKIPPED
test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup SKIP (no CONFIG_PREEMPT)
test_maps: OK, 1 SKIPPED
Fixes: 73b97bc78b ("selftests/bpf: Test concurrent updates on bpf_task_storage_busy")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220919035714.2195144-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Under full preemptible kernel, task local storage lookup operations on
the same CPU may update per-cpu bpf_task_storage_busy concurrently. If
the update of bpf_task_storage_busy is not preemption safe, the final
value of bpf_task_storage_busy may become not-zero forever and
bpf_task_storage_trylock() will always fail. So add a test case to
ensure the update of bpf_task_storage_busy is preemption safe.
Will skip the test case when CONFIG_PREEMPT is disabled, and it can only
reproduce the problem probabilistically. By increasing
TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_LOOP and running it under ARM64 VM with 4-cpus, it
takes about four rounds to reproduce:
> test_maps is modified to only run test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup()
$ export TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_THREAD=256
$ export TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_LOOP=81920
$ export TASK_STORAGE_MAP_PIN_CPU=1
$ time ./test_maps
test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup(135):FAIL:bad bpf_task_storage_busy got -2
real 0m24.743s
user 0m6.772s
sys 0m17.966s
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901061938.3789460-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
This patch adds up test cases that handles 4 combinations:
a) outer map: BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS
inner maps: BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY and BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH
b) outer map: BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS
inner maps: BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY and BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH
Signed-off-by: Takshak Chahande <ctakshak@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220510082221.2390540-2-ctakshak@fb.com
This patch adds BPF_MAP_TYPE_SK_STORAGE test to test_maps.
The src file is rather long, so it is put into another dir map_tests/
and compile like the current prog_tests/ does. Other existing
tests in test_maps can also be re-factored into map_tests/ in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
