commit 1d3ad18394 upstream.
syzbot reported a BUG_ON in ext4_es_cache_extent() when opening a verity
file on a corrupted ext4 filesystem mounted without a journal.
The issue is that the filesystem has an inode with both the INLINE_DATA
and EXTENTS flags set:
EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_cache_extents:545: inode #15:
comm syz.0.17: corrupted extent tree: lblk 0 < prev 66
Investigation revealed that the inode has both flags set:
DEBUG: inode 15 - flag=1, i_inline_off=164, has_inline=1, extents_flag=1
This is an invalid combination since an inode should have either:
- INLINE_DATA: data stored directly in the inode
- EXTENTS: data stored in extent-mapped blocks
Having both flags causes ext4_has_inline_data() to return true, skipping
extent tree validation in __ext4_iget(). The unvalidated out-of-order
extents then trigger a BUG_ON in ext4_es_cache_extent() due to integer
underflow when calculating hole sizes.
Fix this by detecting this invalid flag combination early in ext4_iget()
and rejecting the corrupted inode.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+038b7bf43423e132b308@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=038b7bf43423e132b308
Suggested-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20250930112810.315095-1-kartikey406@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 9d80eaa1a1 upstream.
After running a stress test combined with fault injection,
we performed fsck -a followed by fsck -fn on the filesystem
image. During the second pass, fsck -fn reported:
Inode 131512, end of extent exceeds allowed value
(logical block 405, physical block 1180540, len 2)
This inode was not in the orphan list. Analysis revealed the
following call chain that leads to the inconsistency:
ext4_da_write_end()
//does not update i_disksize
ext4_punch_hole()
//truncate folio, keep size
ext4_page_mkwrite()
ext4_block_page_mkwrite()
ext4_block_write_begin()
ext4_get_block()
//insert written extent without update i_disksize
journal commit
echo 1 > /sys/block/xxx/device/delete
da-write path updates i_size but does not update i_disksize. Then
ext4_punch_hole truncates the da-folio yet still leaves i_disksize
unchanged(in the ext4_update_disksize_before_punch function, the
condition offset + len < size is met). Then ext4_page_mkwrite sees
ext4_nonda_switch return 1 and takes the nodioread_nolock path, the
folio about to be written has just been punched out, and it’s offset
sits beyond the current i_disksize. This may result in a written
extent being inserted, but again does not update i_disksize. If the
journal gets committed and then the block device is yanked, we might
run into this. It should be noted that replacing ext4_punch_hole with
ext4_zero_range in the call sequence may also trigger this issue, as
neither will update i_disksize under these circumstances.
To fix this, we can modify ext4_update_disksize_before_punch to
increase i_disksize to min(i_size, offset + len) when both i_size and
(offset + len) are greater than i_disksize.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Yongjian Sun <sunyongjian1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20250911133024.1841027-1-sunyongjian@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit acf943e976 upstream.
When orphan file feature is enabled, inode can be tracked as orphan
either in the standard orphan list or in the orphan file. The first can
be tested by checking ei->i_orphan list head, the second is recorded by
EXT4_STATE_ORPHAN_FILE inode state flag. There are several places where
we want to check whether inode is tracked as orphan and only some of
them properly check for both possibilities. Luckily the consequences are
mostly minor, the worst that can happen is that we track an inode as
orphan although we don't need to and e2fsck then complains (resulting in
occasional ext4/307 xfstest failures). Fix the problem by introducing a
helper for checking whether an inode is tracked as orphan and use it in
appropriate places.
Fixes: 4a79a98c7b ("ext4: Improve scalability of ext4 orphan file handling")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20250925123038.20264-2-jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit b4cc4a4077 upstream.
The check for a fast symlink in the presence of only an
external xattr inode is incorrect. If a fast symlink does
not have an xattr block (i_file_acl == 0), but does have
an external xattr inode that increases inode i_blocks, then
the check for a fast symlink will incorrectly fail and
__ext4_iget()->ext4_ind_check_inode() will report the inode
is corrupt when it "validates" i_data[] on the next read:
# ln -s foo /mnt/tmp/bar
# setfattr -h -n trusted.test \
-v "$(yes | head -n 4000)" /mnt/tmp/bar
# umount /mnt/tmp
# mount /mnt/tmp
# ls -l /mnt/tmp
ls: cannot access '/mnt/tmp/bar': Structure needs cleaning
total 4
? l?????????? ? ? ? ? ? bar
# dmesg | tail -1
EXT4-fs error (device dm-8): __ext4_iget:5098:
inode #24578: block 7303014: comm ls: invalid block
(note that "block 7303014" = 0x6f6f66 = "foo" in LE order).
ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink() should check the superblock
EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EA_INODE feature flag, not the inode
EXT4_EA_INODE_FL, since the latter is only set on the xattr
inode itself, and not on the inode that uses this xattr.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: fc82228a5e ("ext4: support fast symlinks from ext3 file systems")
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Dongyang <dongyangli@ddn.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Zhuravlev <bzzz@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.whamcloud.com/59879
Lustre-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-19121
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250717063709.757077-1-adilger@dilger.ca
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 91b8ca8b26 ]
Currently we clear BH_New bit in case of error and also in the standard
ext4_write_end() handler (in block_commit_write()). However
ext4_journalled_write_end() misses this clearing and thus we are leaving
stale BH_New bits behind. Generally ext4_block_write_begin() clears
these bits before any harm can be done but in case blocksize < pagesize
and we hit some error when processing a page with these stale bits,
we'll try to zero buffers with these stale BH_New bits and jbd2 will
complain (as buffers were not prepared for writing in this transaction).
Fix the problem by clearing BH_New bits in ext4_journalled_write_end()
and WARN if ext4_block_write_begin() sees stale BH_New bits.
Reported-by: Baolin Liu <liubaolin12138@163.com>
Reported-by: Zhi Long <longzhi@sangfor.com.cn>
Fixes: 3910b513fc ("ext4: persist the new uptodate buffers in ext4_journalled_zero_new_buffers")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250709084831.23876-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2890e5e0f4 ]
Currently, all zeroing ranges, punch holes, collapse ranges, and insert
ranges first wait for all existing direct I/O workers to complete, and
then they acquire the mapping's invalidate lock before performing the
actual work. These common components are nearly identical, so we can
simplify the code by factoring them out into the ext4_fallocate().
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220011637.1157197-11-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 29ec9bed23 ("ext4: fix incorrect punch max_end")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 982bf37da0 ]
The current implementation of ext4_punch_hole() contains complex
position calculations and stale error tags. To improve the code's
clarity and maintainability, it is essential to clean up the code and
improve its readability, this can be achieved by: a) simplifying and
renaming variables; b) eliminating unnecessary position calculations;
c) writing back all data in data=journal mode, and drop page cache from
the original offset to the end, rather than using aligned blocks,
d) renaming the stale error tags.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220011637.1157197-5-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 29ec9bed23 ("ext4: fix incorrect punch max_end")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit e26268ff1d upstream.
fstest generic/388 occasionally reproduces a crash that looks as
follows:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
ext4_block_zero_page_range+0x30c/0x380 [ext4]
ext4_truncate+0x436/0x440 [ext4]
ext4_process_orphan+0x5d/0x110 [ext4]
ext4_orphan_cleanup+0x124/0x4f0 [ext4]
ext4_fill_super+0x262d/0x3110 [ext4]
get_tree_bdev_flags+0x132/0x1d0
vfs_get_tree+0x26/0xd0
vfs_cmd_create+0x59/0xe0
__do_sys_fsconfig+0x4ed/0x6b0
do_syscall_64+0x82/0x170
...
This occurs when processing a symlink inode from the orphan list. The
partial block zeroing code in the truncate path calls
ext4_dirty_journalled_data() -> folio_mark_dirty(). The latter calls
mapping->a_ops->dirty_folio(), but symlink inodes are not assigned an
a_ops vector in ext4, hence the crash.
To avoid this problem, update the ext4_dirty_journalled_data() helper to
only mark the folio dirty on regular files (for which a_ops is
assigned). This also matches the journaling logic in the ext4_symlink()
creation path, where ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() is called directly.
Fixes: d84c9ebdac ("ext4: Mark pages with journalled data dirty")
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250516173800.175577-1-bfoster@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 17207d0bb2 ]
When zeroing a range of folios on the filesystem which block size is
less than the page size, the file's mapped blocks within one page will
be marked as unwritten, we should remove writable userspace mappings to
ensure that ext4_page_mkwrite() can be called during subsequent write
access to these partial folios. Otherwise, data written by subsequent
mmap writes may not be saved to disk.
$mkfs.ext4 -b 1024 /dev/vdb
$mount /dev/vdb /mnt
$xfs_io -t -f -c "pwrite -S 0x58 0 4096" -c "mmap -rw 0 4096" \
-c "mwrite -S 0x5a 2048 2048" -c "fzero 2048 2048" \
-c "mwrite -S 0x59 2048 2048" -c "close" /mnt/foo
$od -Ax -t x1z /mnt/foo
000000 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58
*
000800 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59
*
001000
$umount /mnt && mount /dev/vdb /mnt
$od -Ax -t x1z /mnt/foo
000000 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58
*
000800 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
*
001000
Fix this by introducing ext4_truncate_page_cache_block_range() to remove
writable userspace mappings when truncating a partial folio range.
Additionally, move the journal data mode-specific handlers and
truncate_pagecache_range() into this function, allowing it to serve as a
common helper that correctly manages the page cache in preparation for
block range manipulations.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220011637.1157197-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 43d0105e2c ]
There is no need to write back all data before punching a hole in
non-journaled mode since it will be dropped soon after removing space.
Therefore, the call to filemap_write_and_wait_range() can be eliminated.
Besides, similar to ext4_zero_range(), we must address the case of
partially punched folios when block size < page size. It is essential to
remove writable userspace mappings to ensure that the folio can be
faulted again during subsequent mmap write access.
In journaled mode, we need to write dirty pages out before discarding
page cache in case of crash before committing the freeing data
transaction, which could expose old, stale data, even if synchronization
has been performed.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220011637.1157197-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit ccad447a3d ]
Block validity checks need to be skipped in case they are called
for journal blocks since they are part of system's protected
zone.
Currently, this is done by checking inode->ino against
sbi->s_es->s_journal_inum, which is a direct read from the ext4 sb
buffer head. If someone modifies this underneath us then the
s_journal_inum field might get corrupted. To prevent against this,
change the check to directly compare the inode with journal->j_inode.
**Slight change in behavior**: During journal init path,
check_block_validity etc might be called for journal inode when
sbi->s_journal is not set yet. In this case we now proceed with
ext4_inode_block_valid() instead of returning early. Since systems zones
have not been set yet, it is okay to proceed so we can perform basic
checks on the blocks.
Suggested-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/0c06bc9ebfcd6ccfed84a36e79147bf45ff5adc1.1743142920.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 642335f3ea ]
A file handle that userspace provides to open_by_handle_at() can
legitimately contain an outdated inode number that has since been reused
for another purpose - that's why the file handle also contains a generation
number.
But if the inode number has been reused for an ea_inode, check_igot_inode()
will notice, __ext4_iget() will go through ext4_error_inode(), and if the
inode was newly created, it will also be marked as bad by iget_failed().
This all happens before the point where the inode generation is checked.
ext4_error_inode() is supposed to only be used on filesystem corruption; it
should not be used when userspace just got unlucky with a stale file
handle. So when this happens, let __ext4_iget() just return an error.
Fixes: b3e6bcb945 ("ext4: add EA_INODE checking to ext4_iget()")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241129-ext4-ignore-ea-fhandle-v1-1-e532c0d1cee0@google.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c7fc0366c6 ]
Using mapped writes, it's technically possible to expose stale
post-eof data on a truncate up operation. Consider the following
example:
$ xfs_io -fc "pwrite 0 2k" -c "mmap 0 4k" -c "mwrite 2k 2k" \
-c "truncate 8k" -c "pread -v 2k 16" <file>
...
00000800: 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
...
This shows that the post-eof data written via mwrite lands within
EOF after a truncate up. While this is deliberate of the test case,
behavior is somewhat unpredictable because writeback does post-eof
zeroing, and writeback can occur at any time in the background. For
example, an fsync inserted between the mwrite and truncate causes
the subsequent read to instead return zeroes. This basically means
that there is a race window in this situation between any subsequent
extending operation and writeback that dictates whether post-eof
data is exposed to the file or zeroed.
To prevent this problem, perform partial block zeroing as part of
the various inode size extending operations that are susceptible to
it. For truncate extension, zero around the original eof similar to
how truncate down does partial zeroing of the new eof. For extension
via writes and fallocate related operations, zero the newly exposed
range of the file to cover any partial zeroing that must occur at
the original and new eof blocks.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240919160741.208162-2-bfoster@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2f3d93e210 ]
When I enabled ext4 debug for fault injection testing, I encountered the
following warning:
EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_read_inode_bitmap:201: comm fsstress:
Cannot read inode bitmap - block_group = 8, inode_bitmap = 1051
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 511 at fs/buffer.c:1181 mark_buffer_dirty+0x1b3/0x1d0
The root cause of the issue lies in the improper implementation of ext4's
buffer_head read fault injection. The actual completion of buffer_head
read and the buffer_head fault injection are not atomic, which can lead
to the uptodate flag being cleared on normally used buffer_heads in race
conditions.
[CPU0] [CPU1] [CPU2]
ext4_read_inode_bitmap
ext4_read_bh()
<bh read complete>
ext4_read_inode_bitmap
if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
return bh
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
__jbd2_journal_refile_buffer
__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer
__jbd2_journal_temp_unlink_buffer
ext4_simulate_fail_bh()
clear_buffer_uptodate
mark_buffer_dirty
<report warning>
WARN_ON_ONCE(!buffer_uptodate(bh))
The best approach would be to perform fault injection in the IO completion
callback function, rather than after IO completion. However, the IO
completion callback function cannot get the fault injection code in sb.
Fix it by passing the result of fault injection into the bh read function,
we simulate faults within the bh read function itself. This requires adding
an extra parameter to the bh read functions that need fault injection.
Fixes: 46f870d690 ("ext4: simulate various I/O and checksum errors when reading metadata")
Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240906091746.510163-1-leo.lilong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o:
"Lots of cleanups and bug fixes this cycle, primarily in the block
allocation, extent management, fast commit, and journalling"
* tag 'ext4_for_linus-6.12-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (93 commits)
ext4: convert EXT4_B2C(sbi->s_stripe) users to EXT4_NUM_B2C
ext4: check stripe size compatibility on remount as well
ext4: fix i_data_sem unlock order in ext4_ind_migrate()
ext4: remove the special buffer dirty handling in do_journal_get_write_access
ext4: fix a potential assertion failure due to improperly dirtied buffer
ext4: hoist ext4_block_write_begin and replace the __block_write_begin
ext4: persist the new uptodate buffers in ext4_journalled_zero_new_buffers
ext4: dax: keep orphan list before truncate overflow allocated blocks
ext4: fix error message when rejecting the default hash
ext4: save unnecessary indentation in ext4_ext_create_new_leaf()
ext4: make some fast commit functions reuse extents path
ext4: refactor ext4_swap_extents() to reuse extents path
ext4: get rid of ppath in convert_initialized_extent()
ext4: get rid of ppath in ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents()
ext4: get rid of ppath in ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized()
ext4: get rid of ppath in ext4_convert_unwritten_extents_endio()
ext4: get rid of ppath in ext4_split_convert_extents()
ext4: get rid of ppath in ext4_split_extent()
ext4: get rid of ppath in ext4_force_split_extent_at()
ext4: get rid of ppath in ext4_split_extent_at()
...
On an old kernel version(4.19, ext3, data=journal, pagesize=64k),
an assertion failure will occasionally be triggered by the line below:
-----------
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
{
...
J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_dirty(bh));
/*
* The buffer on BJ_Forget list and not jbddirty means
...
}
-----------
The same condition may also be applied to the lattest kernel version.
When blocksize < pagesize and we truncate a file, there can be buffers in
the mapping tail page beyond i_size. These buffers will be filed to
transaction's BJ_Forget list by ext4_journalled_invalidatepage() during
truncation. When the transaction doing truncate starts committing, we can
grow the file again. This calls __block_write_begin() which allocates new
blocks under these buffers in the tail page we go through the branch:
if (buffer_new(bh)) {
clean_bdev_bh_alias(bh);
if (folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
clear_buffer_new(bh);
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
continue;
}
...
}
Hence buffers on BJ_Forget list of the committing transaction get marked
dirty and this triggers the jbd2 assertion.
Teach ext4_block_write_begin() to properly handle files with data
journalling by avoiding dirtying them directly. Instead of
folio_zero_new_buffers() we use ext4_journalled_zero_new_buffers() which
takes care of handling journalling. We also don't need to mark new uptodate
buffers as dirty in ext4_block_write_begin(). That will be either done
either by block_commit_write() in case of success or by
folio_zero_new_buffers() in case of failure.
Reported-by: Baolin Liu <liubaolin@kylinos.cn>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240830053739.3588573-4-zhangshida@kylinos.cn
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Using __block_write_begin() make it inconvenient to journal the
user data dirty process. We can't tell the block layer maintainer,
‘Hey, we want to trace the dirty user data in ext4, can we add some
special code for ext4 in __block_write_begin?’:P
So use ext4_block_write_begin() instead.
The two functions are basically doing the same thing except for the
fscrypt related code. Remove the unnecessary #ifdef since
fscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto() returns false (and it's known at
compile time) when !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION.
And hoist the ext4_block_write_begin so that it can be used in other
files.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Suggested-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240830053739.3588573-3-zhangshida@kylinos.cn
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently, we release delayed allocation reservation when removing
delayed extent from extent status tree (which also happens when
overwriting one extent with another one). When we allocated unwritten
extent under some delayed allocated extent, we don't need the
reservation anymore and hence we don't need to preserve the
EXT4_MAP_DELAYED status bit. Allocating the new extent blocks will
properly release the reservation.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240813123452.2824659-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When doing block allocation, magic EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE
means the allocating range covers a range of delayed allocated clusters,
the blocks and quotas have already been reserved in ext4_da_map_blocks(),
we should update the reserved space and don't need to claim them again.
At the moment, we only set this magic in mpage_map_one_extent() when
allocating a range of delayed allocated clusters in the write back path,
it makes things complicated since we have to notice and deal with the
case of allocating non-delayed allocated clusters separately in
ext4_ext_map_blocks(). For example, it we fallocate some blocks that
have been delayed allocated, free space would be claimed again in
ext4_mb_new_blocks() (this is wrong exactily), and we can't claim quota
space again, we have to release the quota reservations made for that
previously delayed allocated clusters.
Move the position thats set the EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE to
where we actually do block allocation, it could simplify above handling
a lot, it means that we always set this magic once the allocation range
covers delalloc blocks, no need to take care of the allocation path.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240813123452.2824659-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Almost all callers have a folio now, so change __block_write_begin()
to take a folio and remove a call to compound_head().
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Convert all callers from working on a page to working on one page
of a folio (support for working on an entire folio can come later).
Removes a lot of folio->page->folio conversions.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Most callers have a folio, and most implementations operate on a folio,
so remove the conversion from folio->page->folio to fit through this
interface.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
All callers now have a folio, so pass it in instead of converting
from a folio to a page and back to a folio again. Saves a call
to compound_head().
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
After calling the ext4_da_map_blocks(), a delalloc extent state could
be identified through the EXT4_MAP_DELAYED flag in map. So factor out
buffer_head related handles in ext4_da_map_blocks(), make this function
buffer_head unaware and becomes a common helper, and also update the
stale function commtents, preparing for the iomap da write path in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240517124005.347221-11-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Rename ext4_insert_delayed_block() to ext4_insert_delayed_blocks(),
pass length parameter to make it insert multiple delalloc blocks at a
time. For non-bigalloc case, just reserve len blocks and insert delalloc
extent. For bigalloc case, we can ensure that the clusters in the middle
of a extent must be unallocated, we only need to check whether the start
and end clusters are delayed/allocated. We should subtract the space for
the start and/or end block(s) if they are allocated.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240517124005.347221-10-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Rename ext4_es_insert_delayed_block() to ext4_es_insert_delayed_extent()
and pass length parameter to make it insert multiple delalloc blocks at
a time. For the case of bigalloc, split the allocated parameter to
lclu_allocated and end_allocated. lclu_allocated indicates the
allocation state of the cluster which is containing the lblk,
end_allocated indicates the allocation state of the extent end, clusters
in the middle of delay allocated extent must be unallocated.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240517124005.347221-7-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In ext4_da_map_blocks(), we could find four kind of extents in the
extent status tree: hole, unwritten, written and delayed extent. Now we
only trim the map len if we found an unwritten extent or a written
extent. This is okay now since map->m_len is always set to one and we
always insert one delayed block at a time. But this will become isn't
okay for other two cases if ext4_insert_delayed_block() and
ext4_da_map_blocks() support inserting multiple map->len blocks later.
1. If we found a hole in the extent status tree which es->es_len is
shorter than the length we want to write, we should trim the
map->m_len to prevent adding extra delay more blocks than we
expected. For example, assume we write data [A, C) to a file that
contains a hole extent [A, B) and a written extent [B, D) in the
cache.
A B C D
before da write: ...hhhhhh|wwwwww....
Then we will get extent [A, B), we should trim map->m_len to B-A
before inserting new delalloc blocks, if not, the range [B, C) will
be duplicated.
2. If we found a delayed extent in the extent status tree which
es->es_len is shorter than the length we want to write, we should
trim the map->m_len to es->es_len and return directly since the front
part of this map has been delayed, we can't insert the delalloc
extent that contains the latter part in this round, we should return
the delayed length and the caller should increase the position and
call ext4_da_map_blocks() again. For example, assume we write data
[A, C) to a file that contains a delayed extent [A, B) in the cache.
A B C
before da write: ...dddddd|hhh....
Then we will get delayed extent [A, B), we should also trim map->m_len
to B-A and return, if not, we will incorrectly assume that the write
is complete and won't insert [B, C).
So we need to always trim the map->m_len if the found es->es_len in the
extent status tree is shorter than the map->m_len, prearing for
inserting a extent with multiple delalloc blocks. This patch only does a
pre-fix, the handle is crude and ext4_da_map_blocks() deserve a cleanup,
we will do that later.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240517124005.347221-5-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_da_map_blocks looks up for any extent entry in the extent status
tree (w/o i_data_sem) and then the looks up for any ondisk extent
mapping (with i_data_sem in read mode).
If it finds a hole in the extent status tree or if it couldn't find any
entry at all, it then takes the i_data_sem in write mode to add a da
entry into the extent status tree. This can actually race with page
mkwrite & fallocate path.
Note that this is ok between
1. ext4 buffered-write path v/s ext4_page_mkwrite(), because of the
folio lock
2. ext4 buffered write path v/s ext4 fallocate because of the inode
lock.
But this can race between ext4_page_mkwrite() & ext4 fallocate path
ext4_page_mkwrite() ext4_fallocate()
block_page_mkwrite()
ext4_da_map_blocks()
//find hole in extent status tree
ext4_alloc_file_blocks()
ext4_map_blocks()
//allocate block and unwritten extent
ext4_insert_delayed_block()
ext4_da_reserve_space()
//reserve one more block
ext4_es_insert_delayed_block()
//drop unwritten extent and add delayed extent by mistake
Then, the delalloc extent is wrong until writeback and the extra
reserved block can't be released any more and it triggers below warning:
EXT4-fs (pmem2): Inode 13 (00000000bbbd4d23): i_reserved_data_blocks(1) not cleared!
Fix the problem by looking up extent status tree again while the
i_data_sem is held in write mode. If it still can't find any entry, then
we insert a new da entry into the extent status tree.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240517124005.347221-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
__filemap_get_folio() with FGP_WRITEBEGIN parameter has already wait
for stable folio, so remove the redundant folio_wait_stable() in
ext4_da_write_begin(), it was left over from the commit cc883236b7
("ext4: drop unnecessary journal handle in delalloc write") that
removed the retry getting page logic.
Fixes: cc883236b7 ("ext4: drop unnecessary journal handle in delalloc write")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419023005.2719050-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
