Handling such a late error in request construction is tricky, but to
accommodate future patches which may allocate here, we potentially could
err. To handle the error after already adjusting global state to track
the new request, we must finish and submit the request. But we don't
want to use the request as not everything is being tracked by it, so we
opt to cancel the commands inside the request.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180706103947.15919-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
For symmetry, simplicity and ensuring the request is always truly idle
upon its completion, always emit the closing flush prior to emitting the
request breadcrumb. Previously, we would only emit the flush if we had
started a user batch, but this just leaves all the other paths open to
speculation (do they affect the GPU caches or not?) With mm switching, a
key requirement is that the GPU is flushed and invalidated before hand,
so for absolute safety, we want that closing flush be mandatory.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180612105135.4459-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
When testing reset, we wait for 1s on the main thread for the hang to
start. Meanwhile, we continue submitting requests on all the background
threads, and we may have more threads than cores and so potentially
starve the waiter from being woken within the timeout. As the hang
timeout and the active timeouts are the same, it is hard to distinguish
which caused the timeout. Bump the active thread timeouts to 5s,
compared to the 1s timeout for the hang, so that we preferentially
report the hang timing out, while hopefully ensuring that we do at least
wake up the hang thread first before declaring the background active
timeout.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180517142442.16979-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Even though we weren't injecting guilty requests to be reset, we could
still fall over the issue of resetting the same request too fast -- where
the GPU refuses to start again. (Although it is interesting to note that
reloading the driver is sufficient, suggesting that we could recover if
we delayed the setup after reset?) Continue to paper over the problem by
adding a small delay by waiting for the engine to idle between tests,
and ensure that the engines are idle before starting the idle tests.
v2: Replace single instance of 50 with a magic macro.
References: 028666793a ("drm/i915/selftests: Avoid repeatedly harming the same innocent context")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180411120346.27618-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Today we only want to pass along the priority to engine->schedule(), but
in the future we want to have much more control over the various aspects
of the GPU during a context's execution, for example controlling the
frequency allowed. As we need an ever growing number of parameters for
scheduling, move those into a struct for convenience.
v2: Move the anonymous struct into its own function for legibility and
ye olde gcc.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Currently, we rely on inspecting the hangcheck state from within the
i915_reset() routines to determine which engines were guilty of the
hang. This is problematic for cases where we want to run
i915_handle_error() and call i915_reset() independently of hangcheck.
Instead of relying on the indirect parameter passing, turn it into an
explicit parameter providing the set of stalled engines which then are
treated as guilty until proven innocent.
While we are removing the implicit stalled parameter, also make the
reason into an explicit parameter to i915_reset(). We still need a
back-channel for i915_handle_error() to hand over the task to the locked
waiter, but let's keep that its own channel rather than incriminate
another.
This leaves stalled/seqno as being private to hangcheck, with no more
nefarious snooping by reset, be it whole-device or per-engine. \o/
The only real issue now is that this makes it crystal clear that we
don't actually do any testing of hangcheck per se in
drv_selftest/live_hangcheck, merely of resets!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180406220354.18911-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We don't handle resetting the kernel context very well, or presumably any
context executing its breadcrumb commands in the ring as opposed to the
batchbuffer and flush. If we trigger a device reset twice in quick
succession while the kernel context is executing, we may end up skipping
the breadcrumb. This is really only a problem for the selftest as
normally there is a large interlude between resets (hangcheck), or we
focus on resetting just one engine and so avoid repeatedly resetting
innocents.
Something to try would be a preempt-to-idle to quiesce the engine before
reset, so that innocent contexts would be spared the reset.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180330131801.18327-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Not all callers want the GPU error to handled in the same way, so expose
a control parameter. In the first instance, some callers do not want the
heavyweight error capture so add a bit to request the state to be
captured and saved.
v2: Pass msg down to i915_reset/i915_reset_engine so that we include the
reason for the reset in the dev_notice(), superseding the earlier option
to not print that notice.
v3: Stash the reason inside the i915->gpu_error to handover to the direct
reset from the blocking waiter.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180320100449.1360-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
When injecting rapid resets, we must be careful to at least wait for the
previous reset to have taken effect and the engine restarted. If we
perform a second reset before that has happened, we will notice that the
engine hasn't recovered and declare it lost, wedging the device and
failing. In practice, since we wait for each hanging batch to start
before injecting the reset, this too-fast-reset condition can only be
triggered when moving onto the next engine in the test, so we need only
wait for the existing reset to complete before switching engines.
v2: Wrap up the wait inside a safety net to bail out in case of angry hw.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180205152431.12163-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As the request will, in the following patch, implicitly invoke a
context-switch on construction, we should precede that with a GPU TLB
invalidation. Also, even before using GGTT, we always want to invalidate
the TLBs for any updates (as well as the ppgtt invalidates that are
unconditionally applied by execbuf). Since we almost always require the
TLB invalidate, do it unconditionally on request allocation and so we can
remove it from all other paths.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171120102002.22254-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
I915_RESET_IN_PROGRESS is being used for both signaling the requirement
to i915_mutex_lock_interruptible() to avoid taking the struct_mutex and
to instruct a waiter (already holding the struct_mutex) to perform the
reset. To allow for a little more coordination, split these two meaning
into a couple of distinct flags. I915_RESET_BACKOFF tells
i915_mutex_lock_interruptible() not to acquire the mutex and
I915_RESET_HANDOFF tells the waiter to call i915_reset().
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170316171305.12972-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
