The DP spec says:
"The transmitter shall support at least three levels of voltage
swing (Levels 0, 1, and 2).
If only three levels of voltage swing are supported (VOLTAGE
SWING SET field (bits 1:0) are programmed to 10 (Level 2)),
this bit shall be set to 1, and cleared in all other cases.
If all four levels of voltage swing are supported (VOLTAGE
SWING SET field (bits 1:0) are programmed to 11 (Level 3)),
this bit shall be set to 1,and cleared in all other cases."
Let's follow that exactly instead of the current apporach
where we can set those also for vswing/preemph levels 0 or 1
(or 2 when the platform max is 3).
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200512174145.3186-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
The DP spec says:
"When the combination of the requested pre-emphasis level and
voltage swing exceeds the capability of a DPTX, the DPTX shall
set the pre-emphasis level according to the request and use the
highest voltage swing it can output with the given pre-emphasis level."
and
"When a DPTX reads a request beyond the limits of this Standard,
the DPTX shall set the pre-emphasis level according to the request
and set the highest voltage swing level it can output with the
given pre-emphasis level. If a DPTX is requested for 9.5dB of
pre-emphasis level (may be supported for a DPTX) and cannot support
that level, it shall set the pre-emphasis level to the next
highest level, 6dB."
Ie. we should first validate the pre-emphasis, and then select
the appropriate vswing for it.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200512174145.3186-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
vswing/pre-emphasis adjustment calculation is needed in processing
of auto phy compliance request other than link training, so have
made non-static function.
No functional change.
v1: initial patch.
v2:
- used "intel_dp" prefix in function name. (Jani)
- used array notation instead pointer for link_status. (Ville)
v3: Scrapped the initial patch, modified commit description accordingly.
- made non-static function and used intel_dp prefix. (Jani, Manasi)
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200316103759.12867-4-animesh.manna@intel.com