The Cypress touchscreen controllers are often used with external pull-up
for the interrupt line and the I2C lines, so we might need to enable
a regulator to bring the lines into usable state. Otherwise, this might
cause spurious interrupts and reading from I2C will fail.
Implement support for a "vddio-supply" that is enabled by the cyttsp5
driver so that the regulator gets enabled when needed.
Signed-off-by: Lin, Meng-Bo <linmengbo0689@protonmail.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117190507.87535-3-linmengbo0689@protonmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Add a special case for gpio_count == 1 && gpio_int_idx == 0 to
goodix_add_acpi_gpio_mappings().
It seems that on newer x86/ACPI devices the reset and irq GPIOs are no
longer listed as GPIO resources instead there is only 1 GpioInt resource
and _PS0 does the whole reset sequence for us.
This means that we must call acpi_device_fix_up_power() on these devices
to ensure that the chip is reset before we try to use it.
This part was already fixed in commit 3de93e6ed2 ("Input: goodix - call
acpi_device_fix_up_power() in some cases") by adding a call to
acpi_device_fix_up_power() to the generic "Unexpected ACPI resources"
catch all.
But it turns out that this case on some hw needs some more special
handling. Specifically the firmware may bootup with the IRQ pin in
output mode. The reset sequence from ACPI _PS0 (executed by
acpi_device_fix_up_power()) should put the pin in input mode,
but the GPIO subsystem has cached the direction at bootup, causing
request_irq() to fail due to gpiochip_lock_as_irq() failure:
[ 9.119864] Goodix-TS i2c-GDIX1002:00: Unexpected ACPI resources: gpio_count 1, gpio_int_idx 0
[ 9.317443] Goodix-TS i2c-GDIX1002:00: ID 911, version: 1060
[ 9.321902] input: Goodix Capacitive TouchScreen as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:17.0/i2c_designware.4/i2c-5/i2c-GDIX1002:00/input/input8
[ 9.327840] gpio gpiochip0: (INT3453:00): gpiochip_lock_as_irq: tried to flag a GPIO set as output for IRQ
[ 9.327856] gpio gpiochip0: (INT3453:00): unable to lock HW IRQ 26 for IRQ
[ 9.327861] genirq: Failed to request resources for GDIX1002:00 (irq 131) on irqchip intel-gpio
[ 9.327912] Goodix-TS i2c-GDIX1002:00: request IRQ failed: -5
Fix this by adding a special case for gpio_count == 1 && gpio_int_idx == 0
which adds an ACPI GPIO lookup table for the int GPIO even though we cannot
use it for reset purposes (as there is no reset GPIO).
Adding the lookup will make the gpiod_int = gpiod_get(..., GPIOD_IN) call
succeed, which will explicitly set the direction to input fixing the issue.
Note this re-uses the acpi_goodix_int_first_gpios[] lookup table, since
there is only 1 GPIO in the ACPI resources the reset entry in that
lookup table will amount to a no-op.
Reported-and-tested-by: Michael Smith <1973.mjsmith@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231003215144.69527-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-53-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-52-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-51-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-50-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-49-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-48-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-47-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-46-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-45-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
MELFAS MMS114 and similar touchscreens have support for touch keys.
Enable support of them in the driver. The keycodes to emit can be
controlled by the linux,keycodes DT property.
Sidenote - the MAX_TOUCHKEYS value is set to 15, as that's the
maximum value that the ID field can contain. I don't have access
to any datasheets that could confirm or deny whether this is accurate.
Most downstream drivers I've been able to find only use up to 2 keys
(though I did find a driver that mentioned up to 4, but only 2 were
used). They don't have any checks for a maximum keycode value, it is
just extracted from the ID bits (0xf mask).
The drivers I've been able to find also don't use touch ID 0; I assume
that it is never used, so the keycodes provided in the DT start from
touch ID 1. I suppose this is in-line with the regular behavior
for touch IDs in touchscreen events, as there the provided touch ID
is always lowered by 1, which would cause an overflow if it was 0...
Just in case, we quietly return if the touch ID is set to 0 here.
The implementation of the linux,keycodes property handling code was
adapted from the msg2638 driver.
Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714100424.29798-3-aweber.kernel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714174633.4058096-1-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
