commit f4daa80d6b upstream.
Rust 1.87 (released on 2025-05-15) compiles core library with edition
2024 instead of 2021 [1]. Ensure that the edition matches libcore's
expectation to avoid potential breakage.
[ J3m3 reported in Zulip [2] that the `rust-analyzer` target was
broken after this patch -- indeed, we need to avoid `core-cfgs`
since those are passed to the `rust-analyzer` target.
So, instead, I tweaked the patch to create a new `core-edition`
variable and explicitly mention the `--edition` flag instead of
reusing `core-cfg`s.
In addition, pass a new argument using this new variable to
`generate_rust_analyzer.py` so that we set the right edition there.
By the way, for future reference: the `filter-out` change is needed
for Rust < 1.87, since otherwise we would skip the `--edition=2021`
we just added, ending up with no edition flag, and thus the compiler
would default to the 2015 one.
[2] https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/291565/topic/x/near/520206547
- Miguel ]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # Needed in 6.12.y and later (Rust is pinned in older LTSs).
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138162 [1]
Reported-by: est31 <est31@protonmail.com>
Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1163
Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250517085600.2857460-1-gary@garyguo.net
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
[ Solved conflicts for 6.12.y backport. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit d1f9280524 ]
Commit 8c4555ccc5 ("scripts: add `generate_rust_analyzer.py`")
specified OBJTREE for the bindings crate, and `source.include_dirs` for
the kernel crate, likely in an attempt to support out-of-source builds
for those crates where the generated files reside in `objtree` rather
than `srctree`. This was insufficient because both bits of configuration
are required for each crate; the result is that rust-analyzer is unable
to resolve generated files for either crate in an out-of-source build.
[ Originally we were not using `OBJTREE` in the `kernel` crate, but
we did pass the variable anyway, so conceptually it could have been
there since then.
Regarding `include_dirs`, it started in `kernel` before being in
mainline because we included the bindings directly there (i.e.
there was no `bindings` crate). However, when that crate got
created, we moved the `OBJTREE` there but not the `include_dirs`.
Nowadays, though, we happen to need the `include_dirs` also in
the `kernel` crate for `generated_arch_static_branch_asm.rs` which
was not there back then -- Tamir confirms it is indeed required
for that reason. - Miguel ]
Add the missing bits to improve the developer experience.
Fixes: 8c4555ccc5 ("scripts: add `generate_rust_analyzer.py`")
Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210-rust-analyzer-bindings-include-v2-1-23dff845edc3@gmail.com
[ Slightly reworded title. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 392e34b6bc upstream.
Now that we have our own `Allocator`, `Box` and `Vec` types we can remove
Rust's `alloc` crate and the `new_uninit` unstable feature.
Also remove `Kmalloc`'s `GlobalAlloc` implementation -- we can't remove
this in a separate patch, since the `alloc` crate requires a
`#[global_allocator]` to set, that implements `GlobalAlloc`.
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004154149.93856-29-dakr@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sets the `sysroot` field in rust-project.json which is now needed in
newer versions of rust-analyzer instead of the `sysroot_src` field.
Till [1] `rust-analyzer` used to guess the `sysroot` based on the
`sysroot_src` at [2]. Now `sysroot` is a required parameter for a
`rust-project.json` file. It is required because `rust-analyzer`
need it to find the proc-macro server [3].
In the current version of `rust-analyzer` the `sysroot_src` is only used
to include the inbuilt library crates (std, core, alloc, etc) [4]. Since
we already specify the core library to be included in the
`rust-project.json` we don't need to define the `sysroot_src`.
Code editors like VS Code try to use the latest version of rust-analyzer
(which is updated every week) instead of the version of rust-analyzer
that comes with the rustup toolchain (which is updated every six weeks
along with the rust version).
Without this change `rust-analyzer` is breaking for anyone using VS Code.
As they are getting the latest version of `rust-analyzer` with the
changes made in [1].
`rust-analyzer` will also start breaking for other developers as they
update their rust version (assuming that also updates the rust-analyzer
version on their system).
This patch should work with every setup as there is no more guess work
being done by `rust-analyzer`.
[ Lukas, who leads the rust-analyzer team, says:
`sysroot_src` is required now if you want to have the sysroot
source libraries be loaded. I think we used to infer it as
`{sysroot}/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library` before when only the
`sysroot` field was given but that was since changed to make it
possible in having a sysroot without the standard library sources
(that is only have the binaries available). So if you want the
library sources to be loaded by rust-analyzer you will have to set
that field as well now.
- Miguel ]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/17287 [1]
Link: f372a8a117/crates/project-model/src/workspace.rs (L367-L374) [2]
Link: eeb192b79a/crates/project-model/src/sysroot.rs (L180-L192) [3]
Link: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3AVeykril%2Frust-analyzer%20src_root()&type=code [4]
Tested-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>
Signed-off-by: Sarthak Singh <sarthak.singh99@gmail.com>
Link: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/291565-Help/topic/How.20to.20rust-analyzer.20correctly.20working
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240724172713.899399-1-sarthak.singh99@gmail.com
[ Formatted comment, fixed typo and removed spurious empty line. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Both `core` and `alloc` have their `cfgs` (such as `no_rc`) missing
in `rust-project.json`.
To remedy this, pass the flags to `generate_rust_analyzer.py` for
them to be added to a dictionary where each key corresponds to
a crate and each value to a list of `cfg`s. The dictionary is then
used to pass the `cfg`s to each crate in the generated file (for
`core` and `alloc` only).
Signed-off-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230804171448.54976-1-yakoyoku@gmail.com
[ Removed `Suggested-by` as discussed in mailing list. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Adds support for out-of-tree rust modules to use the `rust-analyzer`
make target to generate the rust-project.json file.
The change involves adding an optional parameter `external_src` to the
`generate_rust_analyzer.py` which expects the path to the out-of-tree
module's source directory. When this parameter is passed, I have chosen
not to add the non-core modules (samples and drivers) into the result
since these are not expected to be used in third party modules. Related
changes are also made to the Makefile and rust/Makefile allowing the
`rust-analyzer` target to be used for out-of-tree modules as well.
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/914
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/rust-out-of-tree-module/pull/2
Signed-off-by: Vinay Varma <varmavinaym@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230411091714.130525-1-varmavinaym@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
More complex drivers might want to use modules to organize their Rust
code, but those module folders do not need a Makefile.
generate_rust_analyzer.py currently crashes on those. Fix it so that a
missing Makefile is silently ignored.
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/883
Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
The `build_error` crate provides a function `build_error` which
will panic at compile-time if executed in const context and,
by default, will cause a build error if not executed at compile
time and the optimizer does not optimise away the call.
The `CONFIG_RUST_BUILD_ASSERT_ALLOW` kernel option allows to
relax the default build failure and convert it to a runtime
check. If the runtime check fails, `panic!` will be called.
Its functionality will be exposed to users as a couple macros in
the `kernel` crate in the following patch, thus some documentation
here refers to them for simplicity.
Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
[Reworded, adapted for upstream and applied latest changes]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
