This was never filled in and thus never truly used.
Checking the EDID for content_type support is not required for sending
the avi infoframe packet.
v2:
- rebase to amd-staging-drm-next
Reviewed-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ashton <joshua@froggi.es>
Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Implements the 'content type' property for HDMI connectors.
Verified by checking the avi infoframe on a connected TV.
This also simplifies a lot of the code in that area as well, there were
a lot of temp variables doing very little and unnecessary logic
that was quite confusing.
It is not necessary to check for support in the EDID before sending a
'content type' value in the avi infoframe also.
v2:
- rebase to amd-staging-drm-next
- mark CRTC state for reset if content_type differs
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Ashton <joshua@froggi.es>
Co-developed-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
When building with clang, there is a warning (or error when
CONFIG_WERROR is set):
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c:368:21: error: variable 'old_payload' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
368 | new_payload, old_payload);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c:344:61: note: initialize the variable 'old_payload' to silence this warning
344 | struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *new_payload, *old_payload;
| ^
| = NULL
1 error generated.
This variable is not required outside of this function so allocate
old_payload on the stack and pass it by reference to
dm_helpers_construct_old_payload(), resolving the warning.
Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1931
Fixes: 5aa1dfcdf0 ("drm/mst: Refactor the flow for payload allocation/removement")
Reviewed-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230913-fix-wuninitialized-dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation-v1-1-2d1b0a3ef16c@kernel.org
[Why]
In drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume() today, it will resume the
mst branch to be ready handling mst mode and also consecutively do
the mst topology probing. Which will cause the dirver have chance
to fire hotplug event before restoring the old state. Then Userspace
will react to the hotplug event based on a wrong state.
[How]
Adjust the mst resume flow as:
1. set dpcd to resume mst branch status
2. restore source old state
3. Do mst resume topology probing
For drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume(), it's better to adjust it to
pull out topology probing work into a 2nd part procedure of the mst
resume. Will have a follow up patch in drm.
Reviewed-by: Chao-kai Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Currently the driver looks DCN registers to access if BL is on or not.
This check is not valid if we are using AUX based brightness control.
This causes driver to not send out "backlight off" command during power off
sequence as it already thinks it is off.
[How]
Only check DCN registers if we aren't using AUX based brightness control.
Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Swapnil Patel <swapnil.patel@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
During 8k video plane resizing we could transition from MPC combine mode
back to ODM combine 2:1 + 8k video plane. In this transition minimal
transition state is based on new state with ODM combine enabled.
We are skipping this and it causes corruption because we have to reassign
a current DPP pipe to a different MPC blending tree which is not supported
seamlessly.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
ODM power optimization excludes subvp power optimization but subvp
optimization can override ODM power optimization even if subvp optimization
configuration is not found. This happens with 4k144hz + 1 5k desktop plane.
We could have applied ODM power optimization however this is overridden by
subvp but subvp ends up deciding not apply its optimization.
[how]
Move ODM power optimization decision after subvp so it will try ODM power
optimization after subvp optimization is not possible.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
We have a few cases where we need to perform update topology update
in dc update interface. However some of the updates are not seamless
This could cause user noticible glitches. To enforce seamless transition
we are adding a checking condition and error logging so the corruption
as result of non seamless transition can be easily spotted.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Why:
vrr_active_fixed should also be checked when
determining if DRR is in use
How:
Add check for vrr_active_fixed when allow_freesync
and vrr_active_variable are also checked
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Austin Zheng <austin.zheng@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Current dc update design has limitation to support transition from
ODM combine to minimum transition to MPC combine state seamlessly
at the capability boundary when MPO plane is resizing. This will
require dc update high level refactor in order to remove the design
limitation. The decision is to block such use case for existing products
by limiting ODM power optimization support for only those surfaces
within guaranteed viewport size. This will prevent us from transitioning
to MPC combine state when ODM power optimization is enabled.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
In some cases such as 8k desktop surface with 144Hz timing, we decide to
enable ODM power optimization but this surface doesn't have a minimum
transition state. Therefore we cannot switch off ODM power optimization seamlessly
This creates path depedency on ODM power optimization decision. i.e
whether or not we should switch off ODM power optimization is dependent
on if the transition to switch off ODM power optimization from current state
is seamless. We don't desire a path dependent power optimization policy
as it is too dynamic and difficult to maintain.
[how]
Attempt ODM power optimization only after we can validate new state without
using pipe combine.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
The result of predict_pipe_split calculation is no longer used but the
function is not removed. This will cause unnecessary calculation
of pipe split prediction in every frame update.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why&How]
For enabling automated testing, add a hook to DCHUBBUB interface so that
mall status can be queried by userspace through debugfs. This removes
dependence on requiring a userspace tool like UMR for querying status
for MALL static screen IGT test.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Some panels request main link off before specific vertical line.
If source turn off main link after specific vertical line then
panel defect will be exposed.
[How]
Add interface to support turn off main link before specific
vertical line
Reviewed-by: Robin Chen <robin.chen@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Hsieh <paul.hsieh@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
In drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume() today, it will resume the
mst branch to be ready handling mst mode and also consecutively do
the mst topology probing. Which will cause the dirver have chance
to fire hotplug event before restoring the old state. Then Userspace
will react to the hotplug event based on a wrong state.
[How]
Adjust the mst resume flow as:
1. set dpcd to resume mst branch status
2. restore source old state
3. Do mst resume topology probing
For drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume(), it's better to adjust it to
pull out topology probing work into a 2nd part procedure of the mst
resume. Will have a follow up patch in drm.
Reviewed-by: Chao-kai Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
build scaling param is overriding validation policy regarding small viewport
support. Even if ODM + windowed MPO is not supported. The decision has
to be made at the time of validation. When building scaling params, we might
be building an initial dc state as an input to DML validation. The initial state
is not supposed to be always valid and we rely on DML to modify the initial
dc state and determine the final validation result. This check is pre judging
validation result when building the initial dc state.
This causes an issue where we are transitioning from desktop only ODM
combine 2:1 to ODM bypass with 2 planes. In this case we are building
an initial state with with ODM 2:1 combine + 2 planes. This is indeed not
supported but DML is about to modify the state so it no longer uses ODM
combine. Before it reaches DML, dc resource already fails validation because
it checks that the initial state is not supported by our policy. This overrides
the ODM decision to validate this state with ODM combine disabled. Therefore
causes an unexpected validation failure when the secondary plane is added
on one side of the screen.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Currently the driver looks DCN registers to access if BL is on or not.
This check is not valid if we are using AUX based brightness control.
This causes driver to not send out "backlight off" command during power off
sequence as it already thinks it is off.
[How]
Only check DCN registers if we aren't using AUX based brightness control.
Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Swapnil Patel <swapnil.patel@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- When disabling a phantom pipe, we first enable the phantom
OTG so the double buffer update can successfully take place
- However, want to avoid locking the phantom otherwise setting
DPG_EN=1 for the phantom pipe is blocked (without this we could
hit underflow due to phantom HUBP being blanked by default)
Reviewed-by: Samson Tam <samson.tam@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Today, the allocation/deallocation steps and status is a bit unclear.
For instance, payload->vc_start_slot = -1 stands for "the failure of
updating DPCD payload ID table" and can also represent as "payload is not
allocated yet". These two cases should be handled differently and hence
better to distinguish them for better understanding.
[How]
Define enumeration - ALLOCATION_LOCAL, ALLOCATION_DFP and ALLOCATION_REMOTE
to distinguish different allocation status. Adjust the code to handle
different status accordingly for better understanding the sequence of
payload allocation and payload removement.
For payload creation, the procedure should look like this:
DRM part 1:
* step 1 - update sw mst mgr variables to add a new payload
* step 2 - add payload at immediate DFP DPCD payload table
Driver:
* Add new payload in HW and sync up with DFP by sending ACT
DRM Part 2:
* Send ALLOCATE_PAYLOAD sideband message to allocate bandwidth along the
virtual channel.
And as for payload removement, the procedure should look like this:
DRM part 1:
* step 1 - Send ALLOCATE_PAYLOAD sideband message to release bandwidth
along the virtual channel
* step 2 - Clear payload allocation at immediate DFP DPCD payload table
Driver:
* Remove the payload in HW and sync up with DFP by sending ACT
DRM part 2:
* update sw mst mgr variables to remove the payload
Note that it's fine to fail when communicate with the branch device
connected at immediate downstrean-facing port, but updating variables of
SW mst mgr and HW configuration should be conducted anyway. That's because
it's under commit_tail and we need to complete the HW programming.
Changes since v1:
* Remove the set but not use variable 'old_payload' in function
'nv50_msto_prepare'. Catched by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230807025639.1612361-3-Wayne.Lin@amd.com
For DRM legacy gamma, AMD display manager applies implicit sRGB degamma
using a pre-defined sRGB transfer function. It works fine for DCN2
family where degamma ROM and custom curves go to the same color block.
But, on DCN3+, degamma is split into two blocks: degamma ROM for
pre-defined TFs and `gamma correction` for user/custom curves and
degamma ROM settings doesn't apply to cursor plane. To get DRM legacy
gamma working as expected, enable cursor degamma ROM for implict sRGB
degamma on HW with this configuration.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2803
Fixes: 96b020e216 ("drm/amd/display: check attr flag before set cursor degamma on DCN3+")
Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Since, calling dcn20_adjust_freesync_v_startup() on DCN3.1+ ASICs
can cause the display to flicker and underflow to occur, we shouldn't
call it for them. So, ensure that the DCN version is less than
DCN_VERSION_3_1 before calling dcn20_adjust_freesync_v_startup().
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Fangzhi Zuo <jerry.zuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
