We don't get any further EVENT from an esd CAN USB device for changes
on REC or TEC while those counters converge to 0 (with ecc == 0). So
when handling the "Back to Error Active"-event force txerr = rxerr =
0, otherwise the berr-counters might stay on values like 95 forever.
Also, to make life easier during the ongoing development a
netdev_dbg() has been introduced to allow dumping error events send by
an esd CAN USB device.
Fixes: 96d8e90382 ("can: Add driver for esd CAN-USB/2 device")
Signed-off-by: Frank Jungclaus <frank.jungclaus@esd.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221130202242.3998219-2-frank.jungclaus@esd.eu
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Currently, some CAN drivers support hardware timestamping, some do
not. But userland has no method to query which features are supported
(aside maybe of getting RX messages and observe whether or not
hardware timestamps stay at zero).
The canonical way for a network driver to advertised what kind of
timestamping it supports is to implement ethtool_ops::get_ts_info().
This patch only targets the CAN drivers which *do not* support
hardware timestamping. For each of those CAN drivers, implement the
get_ts_info() using the generic ethtool_op_get_ts_info().
This way, userland can do:
| $ ethtool --show-time-stamping canX
to confirm the device timestamping capacities.
N.B. the drivers which support hardware timestamping will be migrated
in separate patches.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220727101641.198847-6-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr
[mkl: mscan: add missing mscan_ethtool_ops]
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
