BPF object files are, in a way, the final artifact produced as part of
the ahead-of-time compilation process. That makes them somewhat special
compared to "regular" object files, which are a intermediate build
artifacts that can typically be removed safely. As such, it can make
sense to name them differently to make it easier to spot this difference
at a glance.
Among others, libbpf-bootstrap [0] has established the extension .bpf.o
for BPF object files. It seems reasonable to follow this example and
establish the same denomination for selftest build artifacts. To that
end, this change adjusts the corresponding part of the build system and
the test programs loading BPF object files to work with .bpf.o files.
[0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf-bootstrap
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220901222253.1199242-1-deso@posteo.net
Before change:
selftests: bpf: test_xdp_veth.sh
Couldn't retrieve pinned program '/sys/fs/bpf/test_xdp_veth/progs/redirect_map_0': No such file or directory
selftests: xdp_veth [SKIP]
ok 20 selftests: bpf: test_xdp_veth.sh # SKIP
After change:
PING 10.1.1.33 (10.1.1.33) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.1.1.33: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.320 ms
--- 10.1.1.33 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.320/0.320/0.320/0.000 ms
selftests: xdp_veth [PASS]
For the test case, the following can be found:
ls /sys/fs/bpf/test_xdp_veth/progs/redirect_map_0
ls: cannot access '/sys/fs/bpf/test_xdp_veth/progs/redirect_map_0': No such file or directory
ls /sys/fs/bpf/test_xdp_veth/progs/
xdp_redirect_map_0 xdp_redirect_map_1 xdp_redirect_map_2
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jie2x Zhou <jie2x.zhou@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220719082430.9916-1-jie2x.zhou@intel.com
Convert almost all SEC("xdp_blah") uses to strict SEC("xdp") to comply
with strict libbpf 1.0 logic of exact section name match for XDP program
types. There is only one exception, which is only tested through
iproute2 and defines multiple XDP programs within the same BPF object.
Given iproute2 still works in non-strict libbpf mode and it doesn't have
means to specify XDP programs by its name (not section name/title),
leave that single file alone for now until iproute2 gains lookup by
function/program name.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-3-andrii@kernel.org
