The spreadsheet defines the PLL register block as having
the dwords in the following order:
block dwords offsets
PLL1 0x0-0x7 0x00-0x1f
PLL2 0x0-0x7 0x20-0x3f
PLL1ext 0x10-0x1f 0x40-0x5f
PLL2ext 0x10-0x1f 0x60-0x7f
So dword indexes 0x8-0xf don't even exist. Renumber
our register defines to match.
Note that the spreadsheet used hex numbering whereas our
defiens are in decimal. Perhaps we should change that?
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240422083457.23815-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
VLV_PLL_DW9_BCAST is actually VLV_PCS_DW17_BCAST. The address
does kinda look like it goes to the PLL block on a first glance,
but broadcast is special and doesn't even exist for the PLL
(only PCS and TX have it).
The fact that we use a broadcast write here is a bit sketchy
IMO since we're now blasting the register to all PCS splines
across the whole PHY. So the PCS registers in the other channel
(ie. other pipe/port) will also be written. But I guess the
fact that we always write the same value should make this a nop
even if the other channel is already enabled (assuming the VBIOS/GOP
didn't screw up and use some other value...).
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240422083457.23815-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
struct intel_dpll_hw_state has a spot for all possible
PLL registers across all platforms (well, apart from
cx0/snps). This makes it rather confusing when trying to
figure out which members belong to which platform(s).
Split the struct up into five different platform specific
sub-structures. For now this will actually increase the size
a little bit as we have to duplicate a few members from
skl to icl, but that will be remedied soon when we turn
the thing into a union.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240412182703.19916-17-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
vlv_dpio_read() and vlv_dpio_write() really operate on the phy, not
pipe. Passing the pipe instead of the phy as parameter is supposed to be
a convenience, but when the caller has the phy, it becomes an
inconvenience. See e.g. chv_dpio_cmn_power_well_enable() and
assert_chv_phy_powergate().
Figure out the phy in the callers, and pass phy to the dpio functions.
v2: retract one overzealous pipe->phy change (Ville)
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231114104534.4180144-3-jani.nikula@intel.com
Allow *_calc_dpll_params() to be called even if the N/P dividers
are zero without warning. We'll want to call these to make sure the
derived values are fully computed, but not all users (VLV DSI in
particular) even enable the DPLL and thus the dividers will
be left at zero.
It could also be possible that the BIOS has misprogrammed the DPLL
(IIRC happened with some SNB machines with 4k+ displays) and thus
we'll currently generate a lot of dmesg spew. Better be silent and
just let the normal state checker/etc. deal with any driver bugs.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230705202122.17915-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
XELPDP has C10 and C20 phys from Synopsys to drive displays. Each phy
has a dedicated PIPE 5.2 Message bus for configuration. This message
bus is used to configure the phy internal registers.
XELPDP has C10 phys to drive output to the EDP and the native output
from the display engine. Add structures, programming hardware state
readout logic. Port clock calculations are similar to DG2. Use the DG2
formulae to calculate the port clock but use the relevant pll signals.
Note: PHY lane 0 is always used for PLL programming.
Add sequences for C10 phy enable/disable phy lane reset,
powerdown change sequence and phy lane programming.
Bspec: 64539, 64568, 64599, 65100, 65101, 65450, 65451, 67610, 67636
v2: Squash patches related to C10 phy message bus and pll
programming support (Jani)
Move register definitions to a new file i.e. intel_cx0_reg_defs.h (Jani)
Move macro definitions (Jani)
DP rates as separate patch (Jani)
Spin out xelpdp register definitions into a separate file (Jani)
Replace macro to select registers based on phy lane with
function calls (Jani)
Fix styling issues (Jani)
Call XELPDP_PORT_P2M_MSGBUS_STATUS() with port instead of phy (Lucas)
v3: Move clear request flag into try-loop
v4: On PHY idle change drm_err_once() as drm_dbg_kms() (Jani)
use __intel_de_wait_for_register() instead of __intel_wait_for_register
and uncomment intel_uncore.h (Jani)
Add DP-alt support for PHY lane programming (Khaled)
v4: Add tx and cmn on c10mpllb_state (Imre)
Add missing waits for pending transactions between two message bus
writes (Imre)
General cleanups and simplifications (Imre)
v5: Few nit cleanups from rev4 (imre)
s/dev_priv/i915/ , s/c10mpllb/c10pll/ (RK)
Rebase
v6: Move the mtl code from intel_c10pll_calc_port_clock to mtl function
Fix typo in comment for REG_FIELD_PREP8 definition(Imre)
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> (v4)
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230413212443.1504245-4-radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com
Turns out many of the files that need i915_reg.h get it implicitly via
{display/intel_de.h, gt/intel_context.h} -> i915_trace.h -> i915_irq.h
-> i915_reg.h. Since i915_trace.h doesn't actually need i915_irq.h,
makes sense to drop it, but that requires adding quite a few new
includes all over the place.
Prefer including i915_reg.h where needed instead of adding another
implicit include, because eventually we'll want to split up i915_reg.h
and only include the specific registers at each place.
Also some places actually needed i915_irq.h too.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e78a2e0ac1bffaf5af3b5ccc21dff05e6518cef.1668008071.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
The TV encoder has its own special clocking strategy,
which means we can't just use intel_crtc_dotclock() to
figure out what the resulting dotclock will be given
the actual DPLL port_clock. Additionally the DPLL can't
always generate exactly the frequency we initially asked
for. This results in us computing a bogus dotclock/etc.,
and it won't match the readout which is handled by the
encoder itself properly. Naturally the state checker
becomes unhappy with the mismatch.
To do this sanely we'll need to move the DPLL computation
into encoder->compute_config() so that all the derived
state gets correctly computed based on the actual DPLL
output frequency. Start doing that just for the TV encoder
initally as intel_crtc_dotclock() should be able to handle
other encoder types well enough. Though eventually this
should be done for all encoder types rather than
doing it from intel_crtc_compute_config().
With this we actually do some of the DPLL state computation
twice, but we can skip the second actual .find_dpll() search
by flagging .clock_set=true after we've done it once. We also
still need to avoid clobbering the correct
adjusted_mode.crtc_clock set up by encoder->compute_config()
when called a second time from intel_crtc_compute_config().
Fixes: 665a7b0409 ("drm/i915: Feed the DPLL output freq back into crtc_state")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220909205932.32537-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Only reassign the pipe's DPLL if it's going through a full
.compute_config() cycle. If OTOH it's just getting modeset
eg. in order to change cdclk there doesn't seem much point in
picking a new DPLL for it.
This should also prevent .get_dplls() from seeing a funky port_clock
for DP even in cases where the readout produces a non-standard
clock and we (for some reason) have decided to not fully recompute
the state to remedy the situation.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Currently we calculate a lot of things (pixel rate, watermarks,
cdclk) trusting that the DPLL can generate the exact frequency
we ask it. In practice that is not true and there can be
certain amount of rounding involved.
To allow us to eventually get accurate numbers for all our
DPLL clock derived state we need to move the DPLL calculation
to hapen much earlier. To that end we hoist it up to the just
after the fastset checks. For now we just do the easy code
motion, and the actual back feeding of the final DPLL clock
into the state will come later.
A slight change here is that now .crtc_compute_clock()
can get called while the shared_dpll is still assigned.
But since .crtc_compute_clock() no longer assignes new
shared_dplls this is perfectly fine.
TODO: I'd actually like to do this before the fastset check
so that if the DPLL state should change we actually do the
modeset. Which I think is what the video aficionados want,
but it might not be what the fans of fastboot want. Not yet
sure how to reconcile those conflicting requirements...
v2: s/return/goto/ in error handling
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
