The hardware description for BARs is scattered in many different variables
in pci_epc_features. Some of these things are mutually exclusive, so it
can create confusion over which variable that has precedence over another.
Improve the situation by creating a struct pci_epc_bar_desc, and a new
enum pci_epc_bar_type, and convert the endpoint controller drivers to use
this more well defined format.
Additionally, some endpoint controller drivers mark the BAR succeeding a
"64-bit only BAR" as reserved, while some do not. By definition, a 64-bit
BAR uses the succeeding BAR for the upper 32-bits, so an EPF driver cannot
use a BAR succeeding a 64-bit BAR. Ensure that all endpoint controller
drivers are uniform, and actually describe a reserved BAR as reserved.
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240216134524.1142149-2-cassel@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Currently, the EPF probe function doesn't get the device ID argument needed
to correctly identify the device table ID of the EPF device.
When multiple entries are added to the "struct pci_epf_device_id" table,
the probe function needs to identify the correct one. This is achieved by
modifying the pci_epf_match_id() function to return the match ID pointer
and passing it to the driver's probe function.
pci_epf_device_match() function can return bool based on the return value
of pci_epf_match_id().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230602114756.36586-3-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Fix a number of misspelled words, and while at it, correct two phrases used
to indicate a status of an operation where words used have been cleverly
truncated and thus always trigger a spellchecking error while performing a
static code analysis over the PCI tree.
[bhelgaas: reverse sense of quirk ternary]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220107225942.121484-1-kw@linux.com
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
- Use sysfs_emit() in "show" functions instead of sprintf() to avoid buffer
overruns (Kunihiko Hayashi)
* remotes/lorenzo/pci/endpoint:
PCI: endpoint: Use sysfs_emit() in "show" functions
Most of the "store" functions that handle userspace input via sysfs return
-EINVAL should the value fail validation and/or type conversion. This
error code is a clear message to userspace that the value is not a valid
input.
However, some of the "show" functions return input parsing error codes
as-is, which may be either -EINVAL or -ERANGE. The former would often be
from kstrtobool(), and the latter typically from other kstr*() functions
such as kstrtou8(), kstrtou32(), kstrtoint(), etc.
-EINVAL is commonly returned as the error code to indicate that the value
provided is invalid, but -ERANGE is not very useful in userspace.
Therefore, normalize the return error code to be -EINVAL for when the
validation and/or type conversion fails.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210915230127.2495723-2-kw@linux.com
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
