This codepath won't just be for extents in the future, it'll also be for
BTREE_ITER_FILTER_SNAPSHOTS mode.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This drops bch2_btree_iter_peek_with_updates() and replaces it with a
new flag, BTREE_ITER_WITH_UPDATES, and also reworks
bch2_btree_iter_peek_slot() to respect it too.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This adds the ability for btree iterators to own child iterators - to be
used by an upcoming rework of bch2_btree_iter_peek_slot(), so we can
scan forwards while maintaining our current position.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
As a rule we don't want to be holding btree locks while submitting IO -
this will improve overall filesystem latency.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
When we switched to using bch2_btree_bset_insert_key() for extents it
turned out it started leaving invalid keys around - of type deleted but
nonzero size - but this is fine (if ugly) because they're never written
out.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Add a field to struct btree_iter for tracking whether it should be
locked - this fixes spurious transaction restarts in
bch2_trans_relock().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
This patch adds some new tracepoints to the btree iterator code, and
adds new fields to the existing tracepoints - primarily for the iterator
position.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
fs/bcachefs/bset.c edited prefetch macro to add clang support
fs/bcachefs/btree_iter.c bugfix: initialize iter->real_pos in bch2_btree_iter_init for later use
fs/bcachefs/io.c bugfix: eliminated undefined behavior (negative bitshift)
fs/bcachefs/buckets.c bugfix: invert sign to handle 64bit abs()
Signed-off-by: Brett Holman <bpholman5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Trying to debug an issue where after traverse_all() we shouldn't have to
traverse any iterators... yet we are
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This fixes a regression from
52d86202fd bcachefs: Improve bch2_btree_iter_traverse_all()
We want to avoid mucking with other iterators in the btree transaction
in operations that are only supposed to be touching individual iterators
- that patch was a cleanup to move lock ordering handling to
bch2_btree_iter_traverse_all(). But it broke upgrading of cloned
iterators.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
By changing it to upgrade iterators to intent locks to avoid lock
restarts we can simplify __bch2_btree_node_lock() quite a bit - this
fixes a probable bug where it could potentially drop a lock on an
unrelated error but still succeed instead of causing a transaction
restart.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The patch that changed bch2_trans_relock() to not look at iter->uptodate
also tried to add an optimization by only having it relock
btree_iter_key() iterators (iterators that are live or have been marked
as keep). But, this wasn't thought through - this pops internal iterator
assertions because on transaction restart, when we're traversing
iterators we traverse all iterators marked as linked, and having
bch2_trans_relock() skip some of those mean that it can skil the
iterator that bch2_btree_iter_traverse_one() is currently traversing.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
bch2_btree_iter_peek() wasn't properly checking for
BTREE_ITER_IS_EXTENTS when updating iter->pos.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We need to flush the btree key cache when it's too dirty, because
otherwise the shrinker won't be able to reclaim memory - this is done by
journal reclaim. But journal reclaim also kicks btree node writes: this
meant that btree node writes were getting kicked much too often just
because we needed to flush btree key cache keys.
This patch splits journal pins into two different lists, and teaches
journal reclaim to not flush btree node writes when it only needs to
flush key cache keys.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is an important cleanup, eliminating an unnecessary copy in the
transaction commit path.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Eventually BTREE_ITER_NODES should be going away. This patch is to fix a
transaction iterator overflow in the btree node merge path because
BTREE_ITER_NODES iterators couldn't be reused.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Since we're no longer doing btree node merging post commit, we can now
delete a bunch of code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We're getting away from relying on iter->uptodate - this changes
bch2_trans_relock() to more directly specify which iterators should be
relocked.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This patch starts treating the bpos.snapshot field like part of the key
in the btree code:
* bpos_successor() and bpos_predecessor() now include the snapshot field
* Keys in btrees that will be using snapshots (extents, inodes, dirents
and xattrs) now always have their snapshot field set to U32_MAX
The btree iterator code gets a new flag, BTREE_ITER_ALL_SNAPSHOTS, that
determines whether we're iterating over keys in all snapshots or not -
internally, this controlls whether bkey_(successor|predecessor)
increment/decrement the snapshot field, or only the higher bits of the
key.
We add a new member to struct btree_iter, iter->snapshot: when
BTREE_ITER_ALL_SNAPSHOTS is not set, iter->pos.snapshot should always
equal iter->snapshot, which will be 0 for btrees that don't use
snapshots, and alsways U32_MAX for btrees that will use snapshots
(until we enable snapshot creation).
This patch also introduces a new metadata version number, and compat
code for reading from/writing to older versions - this isn't a forced
upgrade (yet).
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
With snapshots, we're going to need to differentiate between comparisons
that should and shouldn't include the snapshot field. bpos_cmp is now
the comparison function that does include the snapshot field, used by
core btree code.
Upper level filesystem code generally does _not_ want to compare against
the snapshot field - that code wants keys to compare as equal even when
one of them is in an ancestor snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
When we pass BTREE_INSERT_NOUNLOCK bch2_trans_commit isn't supposed to
unlock after a successful commit, but it was calling
bch2_trans_cond_resched() - oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
External (to the btree iterator code) users of bch2_btree_iter_traverse
expect that on success the iterator will be pointed at iter->pos and
have that position locked - but since we split iter->pos and
iter->real_pos, that means it has to update iter->real_pos if necessary.
Internal users don't expect it to modify iter->real_pos, so we need two
separate functions.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
peek() has to update iter->real_pos - there's no need for
bch2_btree_iter_set_pos() to update it as well.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Ideally we'll be getting rid of peek_with_updates(), but the callers
will need to be checked.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Since we're no longer doing next() immediately followed by peek(), this
optimization isn't doing anything anymore.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
btree node iterators need to obey the regular btree node invarionts
w.r.t. iter->real_pos; once they do, bch2_btree_iter_traverse will have
less that it needs to check.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The way btree iterators work internally has been changing, particularly
with the iter->real_pos changes, and bch2_btree_iter_next() is no longer
hyper optimized - it's just advance followed by peek, so it's more
efficient to just call advance where we're not using the return value of
bch2_btree_iter_next().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We keep running into occasional bugs with btree transaction iterators
overflowing - this will make those bugs more visible.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Change fsck code to always put btree iterators - also, make some flow
control improvements to deal with lock restarts better, and refactor
check_extents() to not walk extents twice for counting/checking
i_sectors.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
