Martin reported that on his local dev machine the test_tc_chain_mixed() fails as
"test_tc_chain_mixed:FAIL:seen_tc5 unexpected seen_tc5: actual 1 != expected 0"
and others occasionally, too.
However, when running in a more isolated setup (qemu in particular), it works fine
for him. The reason is that there is a small race-window where seen_tc* could turn
into true for various test cases when there is background traffic, e.g. after the
asserts they often get reset. In such case when subsequent detach takes place,
unrelated background traffic could have already flipped the bool to true beforehand.
Add a small helper tc_skel_reset_all_seen() to reset all bools before we do the ping
test. At this point, everything is set up as expected and therefore no race can occur.
All tc_{opts,links} tests continue to pass after this change.
Reported-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006220655.1653-7-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Simplify __assert_mprog_count() to remove the -ENOENT corner case as the
bpf_prog_query() now returns 0 when no bpf_mprog is attached. This also
allows to convert a few test cases from using raw __assert_mprog_count()
over to plain assert_mprog_count() helper.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006220655.1653-5-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Add a new test case which performs double query of the bpf_mprog through
libbpf API, but also via raw bpf(2) syscall. This is testing to gather
first the count and then in a subsequent probe the full information with
the program array without clearing passed structs in between.
# ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
[...]
./test_progs -t tc_opts
[ 1.398818] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.999 MHz
[ 1.400263] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fd336761, max_idle_ns: 440795243819 ns
[ 1.402734] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
[ 1.426639] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
[ 1.428112] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
#252 tc_opts_after:OK
#253 tc_opts_append:OK
#254 tc_opts_basic:OK
#255 tc_opts_before:OK
#256 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
#257 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
#258 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
#259 tc_opts_demixed:OK
#260 tc_opts_detach:OK
#261 tc_opts_detach_after:OK
#262 tc_opts_detach_before:OK
#263 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
#264 tc_opts_invalid:OK
#265 tc_opts_max:OK
#266 tc_opts_mixed:OK
#267 tc_opts_prepend:OK
#268 tc_opts_query:OK <--- (new test)
#269 tc_opts_replace:OK
#270 tc_opts_revision:OK
Summary: 19/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006220655.1653-4-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Adding selftest that puts kprobe on bpf_fentry_test1 that calls bpf_printk
and invokes bpf_trace_printk tracepoint. The bpf_trace_printk tracepoint
has test[234] programs attached to it.
Because kprobe execution goes through bpf_prog_active check, programs
attached to the tracepoint will fail the recursion check and increment the
recursion_misses stats.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230920213145.1941596-10-jolsa@kernel.org
Adding selftest that puts kprobe.multi on bpf_fentry_test1 that
calls bpf_kfunc_common_test kfunc which has 3 perf event kprobes
and 1 kprobe.multi attached.
Because fprobe (kprobe.multi attach layear) does not have strict
recursion check the kprobe's bpf_prog_active check is hit for test2-5.
Disabling this test for arm64, because there's no fprobe support yet.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230920213145.1941596-9-jolsa@kernel.org
This exercises the newly added dynsym symbol versioning logics.
Now we accept symbols in form of func, func@LIB_VERSION or
func@@LIB_VERSION.
The test rely on liburandom_read.so. For liburandom_read.so, we have:
$ nm -D liburandom_read.so
w __cxa_finalize@GLIBC_2.17
w __gmon_start__
w _ITM_deregisterTMCloneTable
w _ITM_registerTMCloneTable
0000000000000000 A LIBURANDOM_READ_1.0.0
0000000000000000 A LIBURANDOM_READ_2.0.0
000000000000081c T urandlib_api@@LIBURANDOM_READ_2.0.0
0000000000000814 T urandlib_api@LIBURANDOM_READ_1.0.0
0000000000000824 T urandlib_api_sameoffset@LIBURANDOM_READ_1.0.0
0000000000000824 T urandlib_api_sameoffset@@LIBURANDOM_READ_2.0.0
000000000000082c T urandlib_read_without_sema@@LIBURANDOM_READ_1.0.0
00000000000007c4 T urandlib_read_with_sema@@LIBURANDOM_READ_1.0.0
0000000000011018 D urandlib_read_with_sema_semaphore@@LIBURANDOM_READ_1.0.0
For `urandlib_api`, specifying `urandlib_api` will cause a conflict because
there are two symbols named urandlib_api and both are global bind.
For `urandlib_api_sameoffset`, there are also two symbols in the .so, but
both are at the same offset and essentially they refer to the same function
so no conflict.
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230918024813.237475-4-hengqi.chen@gmail.com
Alexei reported seeing log messages for some test cases even though we
just wanted to match the error string from the verifier. Move the
printing of the log buffer to a guarded condition so that we only print
it when we fail to match on the expected string in the log buffer,
preventing unneeded output when running the test.
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Fixes: d2a93715bf ("selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF exceptions")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918155233.297024-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add 4 test cases to confirm the tailcall infinite loop bug has been fixed.
Like tailcall_bpf2bpf cases, do fentry/fexit on the bpf2bpf, and then
check the final count result.
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs -t tailcalls
226/13 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_fentry:OK
226/14 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit:OK
226/15 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_fentry_fexit:OK
226/16 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_fentry_entry:OK
226 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/16 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-4-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a test to test all possible and valid allocation size for bpf
memory allocator. For each possible allocation size, the test uses
the following two steps to test the alloc and free path:
1) allocate N (N > high_watermark) objects to trigger the refill
executed in irq_work.
2) free N objects to trigger the freeing executed in irq_work.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908133923.2675053-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Static ksyms often have problems because the number of symbols exceeds the
MAX_SYMS limit. Like changing the MAX_SYMS from 300000 to 400000 in
commit e76a014334a6("selftests/bpf: Bump and validate MAX_SYMS") solves
the problem somewhat, but it's not the perfect way.
This commit uses dynamic memory allocation, which completely solves the
problem caused by the limitation of the number of kallsyms. At the same
time, add APIs:
load_kallsyms_local()
ksym_search_local()
ksym_get_addr_local()
free_kallsyms_local()
There are used to solve the problem of selftests/bpf updating kallsyms
after attach new symbols during testmod testing.
Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/tencent_C9BDA68F9221F21BE4081566A55D66A9700A@qq.com
The test case creates 4 threads and then pins these 4 threads in CPU 0.
These 4 threads will run different bpf program through
bpf_prog_test_run_opts() and these bpf program will use bpf_obj_new()
and bpf_obj_drop() to allocate and free local kptrs concurrently.
Under preemptible kernel, bpf_obj_new() and bpf_obj_drop() may preempt
each other, bpf_obj_new() may return NULL and the test will fail before
applying these fixes as shown below:
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:open_and_load 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:attach 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:no test prog 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:no test prog 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:no test prog 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:no test prog 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:run prog err 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:run prog err 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:run prog err 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:run prog err 0 nsec
test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:FAIL:ENOMEM unexpected ENOMEM: got TRUE
#168 preempted_bpf_ma_op:FAIL
Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901111954.1804721-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Now 'BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGRP_STORAGE + local percpu ptr'
can cover all BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE functionality
and more. So mark BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE deprecated.
Also make changes in selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py
and selftest libbpf_str to fix otherwise test errors.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827152837.2003563-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a few negative tests for common mistakes with using percpu kptr
including:
- store to percpu kptr.
- type mistach in bpf_kptr_xchg arguments.
- sleepable prog with untrusted arg for bpf_this_cpu_ptr().
- bpf_percpu_obj_new && bpf_obj_drop, and bpf_obj_new && bpf_percpu_obj_drop
- struct with ptr for bpf_percpu_obj_new
- struct with special field (e.g., bpf_spin_lock) for bpf_percpu_obj_new
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827152832.2002421-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add non-sleepable and sleepable tests with percpu kptr. For
non-sleepable test, four programs are executed in the order of:
1. allocate percpu data.
2. assign values to percpu data.
3. retrieve percpu data.
4. de-allocate percpu data.
The sleepable prog tried to exercise all above 4 steps in a
single prog. Also for sleepable prog, rcu_read_lock is needed
to protect direct percpu ptr access (from map value) and
following bpf_this_cpu_ptr() and bpf_per_cpu_ptr() helpers.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827152811.2000125-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
While commit 90f0074cd9 ("selftests/bpf: fix a CI failure caused by vsock sockmap test")
fixes a receive failure of vsock sockmap test, there is still a write failure:
Error: #211/79 sockmap_listen/sockmap VSOCK test_vsock_redir
Error: #211/79 sockmap_listen/sockmap VSOCK test_vsock_redir
./test_progs:vsock_unix_redir_connectible:1501: egress: write: Transport endpoint is not connected
vsock_unix_redir_connectible:FAIL:1501
./test_progs:vsock_unix_redir_connectible:1501: ingress: write: Transport endpoint is not connected
vsock_unix_redir_connectible:FAIL:1501
./test_progs:vsock_unix_redir_connectible:1501: egress: write: Transport endpoint is not connected
vsock_unix_redir_connectible:FAIL:1501
The reason is that the vsock connection in the test is set to ESTABLISHED state
by function virtio_transport_recv_pkt, which is executed in a workqueue thread,
so when the user space test thread runs before the workqueue thread, this
problem occurs.
To fix it, before writing the connection, wait for it to be connected.
Fixes: d61bd8c1fd ("selftests/bpf: add a test case for vsock sockmap")
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230901031037.3314007-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
Recent commit [1] broke d_path test, because now filp_close is not called
directly from sys_close, but eventually later when the file is finally
released.
As suggested by Hou Tao we don't need to re-hook the bpf program, but just
instead we can use sys_close_range to trigger filp_close synchronously.
[1] 021a160abf ("fs: use __fput_sync in close(2)")
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230831141103.359810-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Occasionally, with './test_progs -j' on my vm, I will hit the
following failure:
test_cgrp_local_storage:PASS:join_cgroup /cgrp_local_storage 0 nsec
test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:attach_iter 0 nsec
test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:PASS:iter_create 0 nsec
test_cgroup_iter_sleepable:FAIL:cgroup_id unexpected cgroup_id: actual 1 != expected 2812
#48/5 cgrp_local_storage/cgroup_iter_sleepable:FAIL
#48 cgrp_local_storage:FAIL
Finally, I decided to do some investigation since the test is introduced
by myself. It turns out the reason is due to cgroup_fd with value 0.
In cgroup_iter, a cgroup_fd of value 0 means the root cgroup.
/* from cgroup_iter.c */
if (fd)
cgrp = cgroup_v1v2_get_from_fd(fd);
else if (id)
cgrp = cgroup_get_from_id(id);
else /* walk the entire hierarchy by default. */
cgrp = cgroup_get_from_path("/");
That is why we got cgroup_id 1 instead of expected 2812.
Why we got a cgroup_fd 0? Nobody should really touch 'stdin' (fd 0) in
test_progs. I traced 'close' syscall with stack trace and found the root
cause, which is a bug in bpf_obj_pinning.c. Basically, the code closed
fd 0 although it should not. Fixing the bug in bpf_obj_pinning.c also
resolved the above cgroup_iter_sleepable subtest failure.
Fixes: 3b22f98e5a ("selftests/bpf: Add path_fd-based BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET tests")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230827150551.1743497-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Now that all reported issues are fixed, bpf_refcount_acquire can be
turned back on. Also reenable all bpf_refcount-related tests which were
disabled.
This a revert of:
* commit f3514a5d67 ("selftests/bpf: Disable newly-added 'owner' field test until refcount re-enabled")
* commit 7deca5eae8 ("bpf: Disable bpf_refcount_acquire kfunc calls until race conditions are fixed")
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230821193311.3290257-5-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
For a bpf_kptr_xchg() with local kptr, if the map value kptr type and
allocated local obj type does not match, with the previous patch,
the below verifier error message will be logged:
R2 is of type <allocated local obj type> but <map value kptr type> is expected
Without the previous patch, the test will have unexpected success.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230822050058.2887354-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Attaching extra program to same functions system wide for api
and link tests.
This way we can test the pid filter works properly when there's
extra system wide consumer on the same uprobe that will trigger
the original uprobe handler.
We expect to have the same counts as before.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809083440.3209381-29-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
