mirror of
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git
synced 2025-12-06 01:49:46 +00:00
perf: Fix ring_buffer_attach() RCU sync, again
commit2f993cf093upstream. While looking for other users of get_state/cond_sync. I Found ring_buffer_attach() and it looks obviously buggy? Don't we need to ensure that we have "synchronize" _between_ list_del() and list_add() ? IOW. Suppose that ring_buffer_attach() preempts right_after get_state_synchronize_rcu() and gp completes before spin_lock(). In this case cond_synchronize_rcu() does nothing and we reuse ->rb_entry without waiting for gp in between? It also moves the ->rcu_pending check under "if (rb)", to make it more readable imo. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: tj@kernel.org Fixes:b69cf53640("perf: Fix a race between ring_buffer_detach() and ring_buffer_attach()") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150530200425.GA15748@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
51fbd77c17
commit
12709f95fd
@@ -4331,20 +4331,20 @@ static void ring_buffer_attach(struct perf_event *event,
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(event->rcu_pending);
|
||||
|
||||
old_rb = event->rb;
|
||||
event->rcu_batches = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
|
||||
event->rcu_pending = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&old_rb->event_lock, flags);
|
||||
list_del_rcu(&event->rb_entry);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&old_rb->event_lock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (event->rcu_pending && rb) {
|
||||
cond_synchronize_rcu(event->rcu_batches);
|
||||
event->rcu_pending = 0;
|
||||
event->rcu_batches = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
|
||||
event->rcu_pending = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (rb) {
|
||||
if (event->rcu_pending) {
|
||||
cond_synchronize_rcu(event->rcu_batches);
|
||||
event->rcu_pending = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&rb->event_lock, flags);
|
||||
list_add_rcu(&event->rb_entry, &rb->event_list);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rb->event_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user