raspi/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git synced 2025-12-06 01:49:46 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

cpufreq: Avoid false-positive WARN_ON()s in cpufreq_update_policy()

Browse Source 
commit 742c87bf27 upstream.

CPU notifications from the firmware coming in when cpufreq is
suspended cause cpufreq_update_current_freq() to return 0 which
triggers the WARN_ON() in cpufreq_update_policy() for no reason.

Avoid that by checking cpufreq_suspended before calling
cpufreq_update_current_freq().

Fixes: c9d9c929e6 (cpufreq: Abort cpufreq_update_current_freq() for cpufreq_suspended set)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-28 03:29:29 +02:00
committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 8b592e2ac9
commit 4be5c33b5e
1 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
View File

@@ -2169,6 +2169,10 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
* -> ask driver for current freq and notify governors about a change
*/
if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
if (cpufreq_suspended) {
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto unlock;
}
new_policy.cur = cpufreq_update_current_freq(policy);
if (WARN_ON(!new_policy.cur)) {
ret = -EIO;