When dc_state_destruct() was refactored the new phantom_stream_count
and phantom_plane_count members weren't cleared.
Fixes: 012a04b1d6 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor phantom resource allocation")
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Previously we would call apply_ctx_to_hw to enable and disable
phantom pipes. However, apply_ctx_to_hw can potentially update
non-phantom pipes as well which is undesired. Instead of calling
apply_ctx_to_hw as a whole, call the relevant helpers for each
phantom pipe when enabling / disabling which will avoid us modifying
hardware state for non-phantom pipes unknowingly.
The use case is for an FRL display where FRL_Update is requested
by the display. In this case link_state_valid flag is cleared in
a passive callback thread and should be handled in the next stream /
link update. However, due to the call to apply_ctx_to_hw for the
phantom pipes during a flip, the main pipes were modified outside
of the desired sequence (driver does not handle link_state_valid = 0
on flips).
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Samson Tam <samson.tam@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
When populating dml pipes, odm combine policy should be assigned based
on the pipe topology of the context passed in. DML pipes could be
repopulated multiple times during single validate bandwidth attempt. We
need to make sure that whenever we repopulate the dml pipes it is always
aligned with the updated context. There is a case where DML pipes get
repopulated during FPO optimization after ODM combine policy is changed.
Since in the current code we reinitlaize ODM combine policy, even though
the current context has ODM combine enabled, we overwrite it despite the
pipes are already split. This causes DML to think that MPC combine is
used so we mistakenly enable MPC combine because we apply pipe split
with ODM combine policy reset. This issue doesn't impact non windowed
MPO with ODM case because the legacy policy has restricted use cases. We
don't encounter the case where both ODM and FPO optimizations are
enabled together. So we decide to leave it as is because it is about to
be replaced anyway.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
'panel_cntl' structure used to control the display panel could be null,
dereferencing it could lead to a null pointer access.
Fixes the below:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn21/dcn21_hwseq.c:269 dcn21_set_backlight_level() error: we previously assumed 'panel_cntl' could be null (see line 250)
Fixes: 474ac4a875 ("drm/amd/display: Implement some asic specific abm call backs.")
Cc: Yongqiang Sun <yongqiang.sun@amd.com>
Cc: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
'stream_enc_regs' array is an array of dcn10_stream_enc_registers
structures. The array is initialized with four elements, corresponding
to the four calls to stream_enc_regs() in the array initializer. This
means that valid indices for this array are 0, 1, 2, and 3.
The error message 'stream_enc_regs' 4 <= 5 below, is indicating that
there is an attempt to access this array with an index of 5, which is
out of bounds. This could lead to undefined behavior
Here, eng_id is used as an index to access the stream_enc_regs array. If
eng_id is 5, this would result in an out-of-bounds access on the
stream_enc_regs array.
Thus fixing Buffer overflow error in dcn301_stream_encoder_create
reported by Smatch:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/resource/dcn301/dcn301_resource.c:1011 dcn301_stream_encoder_create() error: buffer overflow 'stream_enc_regs' 4 <= 5
Fixes: 3a83e4e64b ("drm/amd/display: Add dcn3.01 support to DC (v2)")
Cc: Roman Li <Roman.Li@amd.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
After a recent change in LLVM, allmodconfig (which has CONFIG_KCSAN=y
and CONFIG_WERROR=y enabled) has a few new instances of
-Wframe-larger-than for the mode support and system configuration
functions:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20v2.c:3393:6: error: stack frame size (2144) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dml20v2_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
3393 | void dml20v2_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull(struct display_mode_lib *mode_lib)
| ^
1 error generated.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn21/display_mode_vba_21.c:3520:6: error: stack frame size (2192) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dml21_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
3520 | void dml21_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull(struct display_mode_lib *mode_lib)
| ^
1 error generated.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20.c:3286:6: error: stack frame size (2128) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dml20_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
3286 | void dml20_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull(struct display_mode_lib *mode_lib)
| ^
1 error generated.
Without the sanitizers enabled, there are no warnings.
This was the catalyst for commit 6740ec97bc ("drm/amd/display:
Increase frame warning limit with KASAN or KCSAN in dml2") and that same
change was made to dml in commit 5b750b2253 ("drm/amd/display:
Increase frame warning limit with KASAN or KCSAN in dml") but the
frame_warn_flag variable was not applied to all files. Do so now to
clear up the warnings and make all these files consistent.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issue/1990
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
When dc_state_destruct() was refactored the new phantom_stream_count
and phantom_plane_count members weren't cleared.
Fixes: 012a04b1d6 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor phantom resource allocation")
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Some of the CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_FP was added in some non-related FPU code,
which may cause confusion. This commit dropped some of the unnecessary
guards.
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Display code keeps getting improvements, and because of that, some
legacy code is left behind. This commit drops some of those unused
codes.
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Previously we would call apply_ctx_to_hw to enable and disable
phantom pipes. However, apply_ctx_to_hw can potentially update
non-phantom pipes as well which is undesired. Instead of calling
apply_ctx_to_hw as a whole, call the relevant helpers for each
phantom pipe when enabling / disabling which will avoid us modifying
hardware state for non-phantom pipes unknowingly.
The use case is for an FRL display where FRL_Update is requested
by the display. In this case link_state_valid flag is cleared in
a passive callback thread and should be handled in the next stream /
link update. However, due to the call to apply_ctx_to_hw for the
phantom pipes during a flip, the main pipes were modified outside
of the desired sequence (driver does not handle link_state_valid = 0
on flips).
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Samson Tam <samson.tam@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Currently 3-tap chroma subsampling is used for YCbCr422/420. When ODM
pipesplit is used, pixels on the left edge of ODM slices need one extra
pixel from the right edge of the previous slice to calculate the correct
chroma value.
Without this change, the chroma value is slightly different than
expected. This is usually imperceptible visually, but it impacts test
pattern CRCs for compliance test automation.
[How]
Update logic to use the register for adding extra left edge pixel for
YCbCr422/420 ODM cases.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: George Shen <george.shen@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Default driver behaviour is 3-tap subsampling, so we should keep
it the same for test patterns as well. However, it is also useful
to force 1-tap subsampling for testing purposes.
Reviewed-by: Michael Strauss <michael.strauss@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: George Shen <george.shen@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Workaroud for a race condition where DMCUB is in the process of
committing to IPS1 during the handshake causing us to miss the
transition into IPS2 and touch the INBOX1 RPTR causing a HW hang.
[How]
Disable the reallow to ensure that we have enough of a gap between entry
and exit and we're not seeing back-to-back wake_and_executes.
Reviewed-by: Ovidiu Bunea <ovidiu.bunea@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
We're still missing a few and we'd like to avoid continuining when
a hang occurs for debug purposes.
[How]
Add the loop anywhere we try to wait on rptr == wptr in dc_dmub_srv.
Reviewed-by: Ovidiu Bunea <ovidiu.bunea@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Any interface that touches registers needs to wake up the system.
[How]
Add a new interface dc_exit_ips_for_hw_access that wraps the check
for IPS support and insert it into the public DC interfaces that
touch registers.
We don't re-enter, since we expect that the enter/exit to have been done
on the DM side.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Ovidiu Bunea <ovidiu.bunea@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
When populating dml pipes, odm combine policy should be assigned based
on the pipe topology of the context passed in. DML pipes could be
repopulated multiple times during single validate bandwidth attempt. We
need to make sure that whenever we repopulate the dml pipes it is always
aligned with the updated context. There is a case where DML pipes get
repopulated during FPO optimization after ODM combine policy is changed.
Since in the current code we reinitlaize ODM combine policy, even though
the current context has ODM combine enabled, we overwrite it despite the
pipes are already split. This causes DML to think that MPC combine is
used so we mistakenly enable MPC combine because we apply pipe split
with ODM combine policy reset. This issue doesn't impact non windowed
MPO with ODM case because the legacy policy has restricted use cases. We
don't encounter the case where both ODM and FPO optimizations are
enabled together. So we decide to leave it as is because it is about to
be replaced anyway.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
Only required if FIXED_VS retimer does not support DP2-capable.
[HOW]
Gate link rate toggle with DP 128b/132b LTTPR channel coding cap check.
Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Strauss <michael.strauss@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The New sequence has been in use in DCN314 with no regressions
introduced. Therefore, it is safe to enable this sequence for all
devices using FIXED_VS retimers. So, remove the legacy codepath and its
associated config flag.
Reviewed-by: Ovidiu Bunea <ovidiu.bunea@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Strauss <michael.strauss@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
We want programs besides the compositor to be able to enable or disable
panel power saving features. However, since they are currently only
configurable through DRM properties, that isn't possible. So, to remedy
that issue introduce a new "panel_power_savings" sysfs attribute.
v2: squash in fix from Hamza (Alex)
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Tested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
'panel_cntl' structure used to control the display panel could be null,
dereferencing it could lead to a null pointer access.
Fixes the below:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn21/dcn21_hwseq.c:269 dcn21_set_backlight_level() error: we previously assumed 'panel_cntl' could be null (see line 250)
Fixes: 474ac4a875 ("drm/amd/display: Implement some asic specific abm call backs.")
Cc: Yongqiang Sun <yongqiang.sun@amd.com>
Cc: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The error message buffer overflow 'dc->links' 12 <= 12 suggests that the
code is trying to access an element of the dc->links array that is
beyond its bounds. In C, arrays are zero-indexed, so an array with 12
elements has valid indices from 0 to 11. Trying to access dc->links[12]
would be an attempt to access the 13th element of a 12-element array,
which is a buffer overflow.
To fix this, ensure that the loop does not go beyond the last valid
index when accessing dc->links[i + 1] by subtracting 1 from the loop
condition.
This would ensure that i + 1 is always a valid index in the array.
Fixes the below:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/link/protocols/link_dp_dpia_bw.c:208 get_host_router_total_dp_tunnel_bw() error: buffer overflow 'dc->links' 12 <= 12
Fixes: 59f1622a5f ("drm/amd/display: Add dpia display mode validation logic")
Cc: PeiChen Huang <peichen.huang@amd.com>
Cc: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Cc: Meenakshikumar Somasundaram <meenakshikumar.somasundaram@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
On 14us for exit latency time causes underflow for 8K monitor with HDR on.
Increasing the latency to 28us fixes the underflow.
[How]
Increase the latency to 28us. This workaround should be sufficient
before we figure out why SR exit so long.
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Susanto <nicholas.susanto@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Originally, PMFW said min FCLK is 300Mhz, but min DCFCLK can be increased
to 400Mhz because min FCLK is now 600Mhz so FCLK >= 1.5 * DCFCLK hardware
requirement will still be satisfied. Increasing min DCFCLK addresses
underflow issues (underflow occurs when phantom pipe is turned on for some
Sub-Viewport configs).
[how]
Increasing DCFCLK by raising the min_dcfclk_mhz
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sohaib Nadeem <sohaib.nadeem@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The error message buffer overflow 'dc->links' 12 <= 12 suggests that the
code is trying to access an element of the dc->links array that is
beyond its bounds. In C, arrays are zero-indexed, so an array with 12
elements has valid indices from 0 to 11. Trying to access dc->links[12]
would be an attempt to access the 13th element of a 12-element array,
which is a buffer overflow.
To fix this, ensure that the loop does not go beyond the last valid
index when accessing dc->links[i + 1] by subtracting 1 from the loop
condition.
This would ensure that i + 1 is always a valid index in the array.
Fixes the below:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/link/protocols/link_dp_dpia_bw.c:208 get_host_router_total_dp_tunnel_bw() error: buffer overflow 'dc->links' 12 <= 12
Fixes: 59f1622a5f ("drm/amd/display: Add dpia display mode validation logic")
Cc: PeiChen Huang <peichen.huang@amd.com>
Cc: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Cc: Meenakshikumar Somasundaram <meenakshikumar.somasundaram@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
There exists scenarios where the split index for subvp can be
pipe index 0. The assumption in FW is that the split index
won't be 0 but this is incorrect.
[how]
Instead populate non-split cases to be 0xF to differentiate
between split and non-split.
Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
