Andrii Nakryiko 94dccba795 libbpf: mark bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy} as __weak ...

Mark bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy}() kfuncs declared for
bpf_for()/bpf_repeat() macros as __weak to allow users to feature-detect
their presence and guard bpf_for()/bpf_repeat() loops accordingly for
backwards compatibility with old kernels.

Now that libbpf supports kfunc calls poisoning and better reporting of
unresolved (but called) kfuncs, declaring number iterator kfuncs in
bpf_helpers.h won't degrade user experience and won't cause unnecessary
kernel feature dependencies.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

2023-04-18 12:45:11 -07:00

14 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw